Shooting An Elephant Essay

The early years of the 18th century Britain like to be an Imperial present in many countries, they would send troops to capture an area they believed needed their assistance to govern themselves. The natives in the area never tried to revolt because they weren't equip well enough, but they would never accept the intruders causing conflict between one another. Orwell the writer of “Shooting an Elephant” explains the conflict between the Burmese, they would speak under their breath when the officers were just far enough away causing a need for approval by these people. A sort of peer pressure lead to the shooting of an elephant, the people wanted it dead while the man believed the troubles were over. The authority over the native by the Imperialist was a myth, they never had any authority. Should one do what is right for their morals rather than what might be right for others. “Shooting an Elephant” by Orwell shows how peer pressure can lead us to expend our morals, how their authority was a joke to the natives, and how

The Burmese never accepted the white British men, these people always talked behind the backs of the British. They don’t accept the imperialistic ways of life that they are under, the natives don’t accept Orwell so he looks at what the British are doing and notice that a intrusion. Orwell chances the way he looks at life by a need to be accepted by these people, in the story “Shooting an Elephant” by Orwell it explains the disrespect seen by the natives. When he is called to investigate the elephant after the death of a man, he then decides he needs a rifle to kill this animal. In the end he realizes that it’s not really that he wanted to kill the elephant, just he didn’t want to look foolish in front of the Natives. As humans we crave the acceptance of all people no matter if we care for them or