Shogunate Empire Vs. Polynesian Expansion

946 Words2 Pages

I’m convinced that the Shogunate Empire is enormously more advanced than the Polynesian Expansion. They are more advanced in weaponry as they have superior weapons, also in armies or war tactics as they can build bigger and stronger armies and attack and flank their opponents. Lastly they are more advanced in building or architecture as they built more impressive buildings that had great defences to protect their castles or temples.

To begin, the Shogunate’s were vastly superior in weaponry as they had guns, metal swords, bows and metal tipped spears. This meant that the shogunate warriors could attack from long range or fight close up with devastating results. The shogunate’s warriors were Japan's lightning-fast dealer of death with their …show more content…

This compared to the puny Polynesian armies which mostly consisted of twenty to thirty warriors from distinct tribes on the islands. Regardless, these small armies could never put up such a fight like the Shogunate’s did and also win. Still the Polynesian army would of been finished as quick as a fire spreading through a dried out forest. The Shogunate armies consisted of about 5,000 to 10,000 footman and cavalry, which let the Shogunate’s attack from different angles and fight in different terrains which helped let them win their wars. Also, the Polynesian’s had minimal soldiers with all only being foot soldiers so they couldn’t attack from different angles. Fighting on some terrain was extremely difficult for them. This was because they couldn’t move fast towards the attackers as they had no cavalry to ride into battle with, so they didn't have the first strike or attack. So they couldn't control the battle and dictate the moves made by the enemies, which put them on the back foot and against the odds to win. In the end, the shogunate’s could build tremendously larger armies than the Polynesian’s this helped them win wars and fight off enemies. All in all, if the Polynesian’s had to fight in a war against the Shogunate’s they would of lost and their countries …show more content…

Creating buildings to a tremendously higher standard than the Polynesian expansion were. Intelligent people know that the Shogunate’s have built impressive buildings since the Shogunate period. The Shogunate’s built breathtaking temples, castles, halls and houses. These buildings were made primarily made out of wood and stones. Japanese castles were built in a variety of environments, but all were constructed within variations of well-defined architecture. Japanese castles were almost always built on top of a hill or mound, and often an artificial mound would be created for this purpose. This not only aided in the defence of the castle, but also allowed it a great view over the surrounding land, and made the castle look more impressive and intimidating to its attackers. Mountain castles were the most common, and provided the best natural defences for the castle. But a number of measures were also invented to keep attackers off the walls and to stop them from climbing the castle. This included pots of hot sand poured onto attackers climbing the wall, guns built onto the walls to shoot down the attackers and arrow slits from which defenders could fire at attackers while still enjoying cover. The Polynesians never used man made materials, using only materials that were naturally found. These materials were a range of leaves, wood and plants. But all these materials are highly flammable,

More about Shogunate Empire Vs. Polynesian Expansion

Open Document