Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rebellions in us history
American struggles in american revolution
Shays’ rebellion was an example of
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rebellions in us history
Shays Rebellion What do you think that every revolution should should have a anarchy and chaos. Abigail Adam wrote a short letter going to the king about how ignorant and reckless criminal the farmers are. Although the farmers had many reasons there heroes but nevertheless they are villains. Because of the reckless mistakes and the money the waste they are like a mob.They are like a anarchy. In doc B Adams wife said ‘’The men are ignorant and are restless criminals without morals or consequences’’ it was so chaos that they had to shut many courts down cuse of the big groups of crazy protesters.that mean that they really don't care if they get in trouble because they're breaking the law. What it is that they the farmers think buy doing bad
The whiskey Rebellion Witten by Thomas P. Slaughter talks bout a rebellion that setup a precedent in American history. It gives us the opportunity to really comprehend this rebellion that thanks to fast action from the Federal government didn’t escalate to a more serious problem like civil war. The book the Whiskey Rebellion frontier of the epilogue to the American Revolution captures the importance and drama of the rebellion. The book is divided into three sections context, chronology and sequence. In the first section Slaughter explain the reason why the taxes was needed in the first place. According to Anthony Brandt in his article of American history name “Rye Whiskey, RYE Whiskey” Alexander Hamilton, secretary of the
1) Shays' Rebellion, the post-Revolutionary clash between New England farmers and merchants that tested the precarious institutions of the new republic, threatened to plunge the "disunited states" into a civil war. The rebellion arose in Massachusetts in 1786, spread to other states, and culminated in an abortive attack on a federal arsenal.
Even with these faults, this society appreciates the hard work of farming compared to the easy way of living today. One point of Berry’s argument is that he believes that the land is falling more and more into the hands of speculators and professional people from the cities, who, in spite of all the scientific agricultural miracles, still have more money than farmers. Big technology and large economies have caused more abandonment of land in the country than ever before. Many of the great farmers are clearly becoming different because they lack manpower and money to maintain properly. The number of part-time farmers and ex-farmers increases every year due to the problems with money and resources.
In the book Whiskey Rebellion: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and the Frontier Rebels Who Challenged America’s Newfound Sovereignty by William Hogeland. The author doesn’t just talk about what started the Whiskey Rebellion and what happened during this period. But he wanted to show you the underlining of this Rebellion as it was one of the major parts of the founding period. Also that there are lot of characters that we don’t learn about, he realizes that people don’t really know about the Whiskey Rebellion. That is wasn’t just a couple of “blackened faced, dress wearing” (Hogeland 20) people. He wanted the general people to understand what the Whiskey Rebellion really was the establishment of federal authority.
The farm, in many ways, was very prosperous when the revolution began. The animals were given an education, “the reading and writing classes were however a great success,” which made them feel equal to the humans because they were now learning in the same way the humans did. The farm was becoming more prosperous in that, “ everyone worked according to their own capacity,” which made the farm a happier place to work in, and the more work was done, the better. This hard work paid off because, “ the harvest was an even bigger success than they had hoped, ‘ which motivate and encouraged the animals. The animals also did very well in working together in building the windmill which even though it fell down, they carried on rebuilding stronger and bigger ones.
I believe in the actions of members of Shays’s Rebellion because they were losing their land. I believe in their actions because if the government stole my land and my money I would revolt as well. I also believe that the government didn’t care about the farmers at all. I know this because they passed 2 acts. One act was the Militia act which stated “If anybody in the militia was to rebel against congress they could be killed.” The other act they passed was the riot act in 1786 which stated, “If 12 or more people rebelled they could be imprisoned, killed, or pay debts.” They had disadvantages as well. One disadvantage was that the farmers had barely any weapons, but the militia did. The militia also stopped Shays’s Rebellion on Governor Bowdoin’s
One cannot think of the tenants of these farms without feeling some sort of pity or sympathy, because they had no concept of banks or land ownership. To them, land was theirs if they lived, struggled, and eventually died on it; not just because of a flimsy sheet of paper in hand. "My pa come here fifty years ago. An' I ain't a-goin'."(60), was the sentiment expressed by Muley Graves and felt by many Oklahomans when first ordered off their farms. Some reacted quite violently, threatening to shoot anyone who came onto their land with a tractor to tear down their house, but when the tractor came and one of their friends drove it, they laid down their guns in submission. "Who gave you orders? I'll go after him. He's the one to kill."(49), said one disgruntled farmer. "You're wrong. He got his orders from the bank." the driver replied. The farmer also found out that the bank got their orders from the East and wondered in exasperation, "But where does it stop? Who can we shoot?"(49) Basically, the tenants were cut off from their livelihood and without hope since they weren't even sure whom they could kill or what person to talk to in order to keep the land.
Before the reform, some estates slaughtered animals and distributed the meat among their laborers, some held fairs and brought marimbas and dance groups and provided them with a plantation house. These gifts were no longer provided for the peasants and now laborers had to learn how to be independent and deal with the outside world by themselves. This turned out to be a problem, as peasants were always dependent on their patrón and had no education or training navigating the world outside of the farm. This led to desperation and caused the peasants to turn to violence and illegal measures. Peasants began to struggle for the same land and often fought over this. They began invading lands without the government’s permission because the paperwork for the redistribution of land was too slow and they were in a miserable situation. Landholders saw these conditions as a path to pressure the government and the president to withdraw his bill and leave the agricultural situation how it previously was.
Rice does a stupendous job of briefly and easily reinterpreting and breaking down a time of revolution, rebellion, and transformation within colonial America. Though short and sweeping, his intriguing work should not go unnoticed for he recreates a crucial event in history into something much more exciting than ever before for his audience. Rice ties this rebellion to other revolutions that would follow such as the Glorious Revolution in Maryland arguing that there is a link between this revolt in 1676 and the many others than would eventually follow. Rice’s narrative is one that is extremely unique. His ability to affectively grasp his readers attention on subjects of history such as Bacon’s Rebellion, that have been previously over looked due to their blandness, is truly remarkable. Despite his inability to give an in-depth analysis on each event that occurred, making the subject interesting and reasonable to read and understand is more important for the success of the narrative. Though some claims within the book could probably use further elaboration for his audience, James D. Rice’s Tales from a Revolution is a well-written book that is able to convey in a concise manner, accurate information regarding an extremely important event in history for a wide array of audiences using what can be considered a new-age style of
Farmers everywhere in the United States during the late nineteenth century had valid reasons to complaint against the economy because the farmers were constantly being taken advantage of by the railroad companies and banks. All farmers faced similar problems and for one thing, farmers were starting to become a minority within the American society. In the late nineteenth century, industrialization was in the spotlight creating big businesses and capitals. The success of industrialization put agriculture and farmers on the down low, allowing the corporations to overtake the farmers. Since the government itself; such as the Republican Party was also pro-business during this time, they could have cared less about the farmers.
...struggling to earn any income at all and sometimes do not even get the opportunity to eat. Another issue that Raj Patel did not touch on is the lack of care consumers have for the farmers. It seems that consumers care about farmers about as much as the corporations do, which, in my opinion, is not a lot. When consumers only care about low prices and large corporations only care about making a profit, the farmers are left out to dry. Many consumers believe “food should be available at a bargain price, a belief that relies on labor exploitation and environmental exhaustion at multiple points along the commodity chain.” (Wright, 95) Corporations as well as consumers generally tend to be selfish and I think Raj Patel is afraid to mention this. If only these people cared a little bit more about each other I believe the hourglass of the food system will begin to even out.
The tractors hired by the bank literally tear down the bond between man and the land. Due to the eviction, the farmers are forced to move to California, where work is supposedly in demand. As each family takes off for California, it no longer feels a connection to the lands through which it is traveling. Once it reaches California, it feels no connection to its land. For the first time, it is forced to be dependent on somebody else's generosity in distributing jobs, and most importantly, somebody else's land. Thus, in California, the relationship between man and land is not as strong as it was in Arkansas and Oklahoma. The change in this relationship is due in part to the mercilessness of the bank, and in the end, man loses because its connection to the only significant thing it has ever owned is gone. Once the families travel to California, each family member's soul stays back in Oklahoma, making it difficult to adjust to working on lands that have not been cultivated by their own family for generations.
...nnected to nature and have the responsibility of providing the world food, clothing, and a great deal of other things as well. Through it all farmers are a tight-knit group of men and women who have a mutual respect of nature and each other regardless of what type of farming they choose.
As farmers and small farming communities become more and more distanced from the land and one another, a greater dissatisfaction results in the farmer's perception of his/her life. In Kent Meyers' novel, "The River Warren," Two-Speed Crandall becomes a victim of this trend. To understand why this dissatisfaction is becoming more prevalent, we must look at the decline of more traditional methods of farming in favor of contemporary agriculture. Also, we must explore the disintegration of community in the lives of rural farmers. These two factors are inevitably correlated; a transition to industrial, corporate farming leads to the farmer feeling less a part of a farming community.
As agriculture has become more intensive, farmers have become capable of producing higher yields using less labour and less land. Growth of the agriculture has not, however, been an unmixed blessing. It, like every other thing, has its pros and cons. Topsoil depletion, groundwater contamination, the decline of family farms, continued neglect of the living and working conditions for farm labourers, increasing costs of production, and the disintegration of economic and social conditions in rural communities. These are the cons of the new improved agriculture.