Shakespeare Not Of Age But For All Mankind Summary

452 Words1 Page

The Elizabeithan era was much diffrent from the 21st centery. Some of the differences are: they didn't have fancy lights or sound producers, that people were a lot more open minded about having new words used, , . The first way that Shakespeare's world was diffreent than the modern world is that they didn't have fancy lights or sound producers. They just had to speak up and hope for good weather. The article titled" Shakespeare: Not of Age, But for All Mankind" by Douglas A. Burger says," There are no artifical lights, no conventional sets, no fancy rigging." By this he means that there were no specail effects that we are used to. This is unlike the modern world, in which we have artifical lights, small microphones so …show more content…

They didn't have cell phones or socail media to keep them entertained. In fact, the article titiled "Shakespeare: Not of an Age , but for All Mankind" by Douglas A. Burger says," That hard- headed capitalists and officals would be willing, even egar, to invest in the project shows that Shakespeare is a good buisness." This shows that they made a lot of money off of plays because that was the entertainment they got, and obviously enjoyed. A final difference between Shakespeare's world and modern times is you had to present your new play in front of the Queen before you could put it on. IN the essay " Actors in Shakesperare's Day", Stephanie Chidester writes, "If players were to legally retained by novlemen, they had to prove they could act, and one means of demonstraiting their ligitimacy was playing at court for Queen Elizabeth." This illustrates a significant difference because in the modern world if you want to put on a play, you get all the equipment, you don't have to get the Queen's permission. This shows how our world and Shakespare's world is

Open Document