Shakespeare Conspiracy Theory

634 Words2 Pages

It is often a subject of debate amongst literary scholars and to this day it is a great mystery to the world. This question has many possible answers. Among the most likely are Edward de Vere, Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, and, of course, William Shakespeare. There are a few other mentioned possibilities, but there is so little evidence for them that they do not appear worthy of mention. Each of the proposed authors have different traits and their own pieces of evidence suggesting that they are the true authors of Shakespeare, but only one theory can be true, or can they? Is it possible that there is more than one author of Shakespeare's work? These lead to the biggest question, however. Who really wrote the famous works of Shakespeare?

According to Jumana Farouky of Time Magazine, the Shakespeare authorship question is nothing …show more content…

With the question being examined by so many literary scholars, information has come to light which points to people other than William Shakespeare as being the author. One of these people offered up as the supposedly true author of Shakespeare is a man by the name of Christopher Marlowe. However, Marlowe was claimed to have died before many of Shakespeare's works were written, so the question becomes, how could he have written Shakespeare? One claim is that Marlowe faked his death, which is theoretically possible. There are aspects of Marlowe's life that seem to indicate that he most definitely had the ability to fake his own death. First of all, the 3 witnesses to his death were all professional liars. According to The Shakespearean Authorship Trust, two of the witnesses were con men and two worked as spies like Marlowe (one being both a spy and a conman). This indicates that he could easily have faked his own death and had his so called witnesses claim he was dead. Suspicion is also

Open Document