Separation Of Powers Essay

459 Words1 Page

When the United States Constitution was first established, the framers had in mind a government that would allow for itself to be put in check by the people and itself. They could no longer stand for tyranny, which is why they established a system in which there could be separate parts of the government making laws, interpreting, and enforcing them. These Separation of Powers, first thought of in the 51st Federalist Paper, written by James Madison, are known as our three branches of government; the legislative, judicial, and executive branches. However, the main issue with validating the Constitution was that the Anti-Federalists were afraid of a central government controlling the power in the nation. The Bill of Rights was then enacted as …show more content…

They of course did not want just one person to rule or even small groups of people to have power, but also a large portion of the population. If a huge portion of the population could come together, then this would be just as detrimental to society as if just one person was in charge. The Founders also did not want a strong government, which is why the separation of powers was put into place. With the Constitution, the Founders were able to tackle both issues of tyranny of government and tyranny by the majority. Checks and balances solved the problem of tyranny by government, while only allowing citizens to vote on certain parts of the government settled the issue of tyranny by the majority of the people. The rights against tyranny were put in place because of how colonials were treated by the British homeland leading up to the American Revolution. The revolution occurred because colonists did not want to be taxed unfairly as well as being restricted on trade. All the colonists really wanted to do was to protect their rights as British

Open Document