Comparing The Sennacherib Prism And The Book Of Kings

587 Words2 Pages

The Sennacherib Prism and The Book of Kings present such contrasting versions of the siege because they are told from different viewpoints with different goals. Sennacherib wants to show how much military power he has and how easy it was to conquer the Hebrews. He wants to show how he humiliated their king and became rich from their tributes. “I made Hezekiah a prisoner in Jerusalem, his royal residence, like a bird in a cage,” (The Sennacherib Prism). The Hebrew’s perspective from The Book of Kings says that they asked for a tribute to pay. It doesn’t put very much emphasis on being conquered or the battle itself like The Sennacherib Prism does. It goes on to say that once they had paid the tribute the Lord came down and killed 185,000 soldiers and forcing Sennacherib to retreat. The Sennacherib Prism has no mention of this devastating defeat at all. Sennacherib wants to portray himself as an undefeatable conqueror so he leaves out mention of the defeat included in The Book of Kings. He gives examples of his power by taking 300 talents of silver and 30 …show more content…

They are both very biased towards their side and give completely different stories. The reality of what happened was probably a combination of the two, but excluding the unbelievable parts. The author of The Sennacherib Prism wanted to glorify Sennacherib’s conquests and demonstrate the power of their nation. “”I surrounded and conquered 46 of his strongly fortified cities and countless small towns using siege ramps, battering rams, and relentless attacks of foot soldiers, using mines, as well as trenches,” (The Sennacherib Prism). He omits the defeat of their army and the freeing of the Hebrews included in The Book of Kings. The Book of Kings says that God killed 185,000 of Sennacherib’s men, something that probably did not occur. However, Sennacherib was probably defeated and forced to retreat by something

Open Document