Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The absurdity of self-deception
Self deception philosophy
Essays on self deception
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Leadership and Self-Deception: Getting out of the Box” by The Arbinger Institute is about the culture of a company, Zagrum, and how the culture has contributed to it’s success. The concept that Zagrum relies on is ridding the company of “people problems” as a result from “being in the box”. The book talks about being in the box and what it means, how you get in the box, and how you get out of the box. The Arbinger Institute’s book describes how Zagrum’s top initiative is to reduce “self-deception” both on an individual and organizational level. This idea of self-deception is the philosophy where one is not aware of a problem. Self-deception is like a disease within a company and the symptoms of this disease are “people problems”. This idea relates to being in the box. When out of the box, people are seen as people, in the box, people are seen as objects. There are 6 steps of getting in the box. Step 1 is not acting in the way you know you should or feel you should for another person, known as self-betrayal. For example, if I know that I should apologize to my boyfriend but I decid...
Bonnici demonstrates that a leader should not be part of the problem, but a solution. In any practical University or Physical therapy center for example, certain issues might emanate and become problems in that particular place. Therefore, a leader should learn how to handle these issues ra...
provides very important approaches to leadership and ways of dealing with dilemmas, negative feedback, and other management issues. Although it has a few minor short comings, the book is well-written and properly structured, making it easy for the target readers to understand its content.
Leadership is defined as the action of guiding an individual or group of people. Effective leaders shape the behavior and thought process of the individuals around them. As a result, the success of an organization is often impacted by the leadership style and approach of its leaders. Even when engaging with multiple people, impactful leaders maintain their own style of leadership but occasionally change their approach based on the motivational needs of each individual. However, regardless of the style, leadership within an organization is designed to drive the performance of their employees and it is done through proficient communication. This guidance influences the culture of an organization, which subsequently, helps to shape its leaders.
The emphasis on leaders being not just executives and managers, and that not all executives and managers are leaders, is extremely vital. Anyone can strive to be a leader in whatever organization in which they are involved. Bennis and Nanus claim that leadership is about character, setting the example for how team members treat one other (and in a corporate setting, their clients as well), being truthful and sustaining organizational trust, and encouraging themselves and others to learn. On one hand, it can be easy to see how many people in leadership positions do no match up to these standards of leadership. On the other, it seems a bit like common sense to be truthful to others and to effectively communicate with people who work together everyday. Leaders is an effective tool for summarizing and inspiring leadership not in that it teaches tough strategies and manipulations, but that when looking at an overview of its content, Bennis and Nanus are essentially teaching human relations and human decency. All in all, this book highlights strategies for us all to be better in our lives and our everyday
Leadership constantly presents challenges to the leader’s abilities. Changes occur in the organization environment, disrupting the equilibrium. The approach a leader uses to handle and manage challenges effectively, greatly determine the success of the organization (Hall and Hord, 2006). In the modern-day organizations, challenges come in the form of people and obstacles that prevent the organization from reaching its goals. Moreover, there are a lot of complexity and unpredictability. New set of skills is required for the organization to stay competitive and achieve the set goals. Hence, the life of a modern-day leader is more demanding than ever (Kouzes and Posner, 2006).
In the book, Leadership and Self-Deception, the author shows us how leadership is affected negatively by something called Self-Deception. Self-Deception is a concept where one blames everyone else for the problems that are going on, where you can only see things from your perspective, you see through these rose-colored glasses that you don’t know are on. In the book they use the example of Ignaz Semmelweis, he was a doctor in the mid-1800s in Austria who couldn’t figure out why so many patients in his ward were dying. He tried everything he could think of to change the situation. He set the standard regulations so that all the wards did everything the same way, still fatality rate in his ward was far higher than any other. Turns out that many of the doctors in his ward were doing research on dead bodies and then coming to examine live patients without washing their hands (hand washing and general hygiene things that we take for granted were not known of at this time). The only difference between his ward and the others was that more doctors partook of the research in his than from the others. Once he realized this he started having the doctors wash their hands before tending to the live patients, instantly the death rate dropped dramatically. The point here is that before Semmelweis finally came to this conclusion he couldn’t figure out what his problem was because of a lack of knowledge. This makes it exceedingly difficult to change, or want to change, it’s called being in the box. You have this problem, but you don’t know it, your trapped in this box where you’re blind to what is really going on around you.
In this paper, we have examined our company of choice, TM Berhad, utilizing each of these four frames as a “spectacle” to determine the leadership approach of its management, and then detailing the more prominent of the frames used.
A person’s title within the organization does not make them a leader. The driving factor which determines if someone is in a leader position is their behavior. This person who is a leader will guide those in the organization by influencing, guiding, giving direction, and opinions (Marquis & Huston, 2012). The culture as well as the climate of an organization begins with the leadership (Azaare & Gross, 2011). Each individual person has their own leadership style. Knowing one’s own leadership style will help them understand themselves and be able to grow as a leader. The purpose of this paper is to look at my own leadership style, including my strengths for leading others. A description of a potential challenge that I foresee due to my leadership style and a plan for my personal leadership development will be discussed.
The case study, ‘Waiting for Clearance’, concentrates on the leadership concept of followership and how it affects followers and leaders within an organization. The company involved in the case study is Alvon Biometrics. The case study and analysis by our virtual team is about the relationship between CEO Tony Bussard, and his COO, Juan Carlos De La Vega. The case study questions concentrate on exploring followership concepts relating to how COO Juan De La Vega’s handling of repairing the follower-leadership relationship that he has with CEO Bussard a year after being hired by the Alvon Biometrics Company. The next several sections of this paper will answer key questions, followed by identifying
Rosen, R. H. (1997). Learning to lead. In F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith & R. Beckhard (Eds.), The Organization of the Future. The Drucker Foundation Future Series (p. 306). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass Inc Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. (4th ed., p. 13). San Francisco: Johan Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Walesh, S. G. (2012). The leader within you: Let it come out!. Leadership & Management in
...l man who enables others to think and do in his way (role model) and his employees work him for unconditional loyalty (e.g. his PA), also, adopt a fair system of rewards and punishments; however, as a leader sometimes he just needs some transformational styles which respect and communicate with followers equally rather than forced them to shut up rudely. As for organizational culture, the article obtains further understanding that some factors attribute to detect cultures existed in an organisation, communication system, for example. As a result, it can be identified that his culture not only can be classified as power but task. Moreover, due to the changeable outside environment, compounded and flexible cultures seems to be a better way for an organisation’s sustainable development. Therefore, leadership is tightly related to organizational culture.
In this paper I will speak of my leadership experiences as well as how my particular leadership style will continue to enhance and shape my role in the culture of the organization which I serve. Over the course of this class we have learned the skillsets (hard vs soft) as well as characteristics traits which make a great leader. Through the assignments, interactions with discussions boards, and group projects I have been able to determine what leadership theory I am best associated with. As discussed in chapter fourteen, the theory which best fits my leadership style is The Path-Goal Leadership Model. According to our textbook Management: A Practical Introduction by Angela Kinicki and Brian Williams, Robert House created and redevised this
Leaders come in all forms, whether they are a boss or a coach of some sort. Leaders are expected to motivate their followers. The failure of the company typically divulges on the non-achievement of the leader and the goals of the followers, (Giessner & Knippenberg, 2008). The theoretical approach of this article is essentially processed on the social identity approach. Social identity focuses primarily on how and what type of credit a leader achieves by their followers when success is a factor and vice versa. Giessner and Knippenberg(2008) argue that most leaders whom are less desirable and trustworthy should not be compared as deeply as those who are more desirable and trustworthy. The theory of “license to fail” is discussed by Giessner and Knippenberg(2008). Generally in an organization, a leaders’ prototypicality determines the amount of support they have in an organization. This is generally determined by how often the follower follows the leaders’ instructions and obeys their
In the twenty first century, leaders are required to build a greater impression in which people believe in strategy, trust in management decisions, and trust in their work. Once people believe in management choice, there will be enthusiasm inside an organisation. Such an environment helps the organisation growing or flourish. A doing well leaders create a surroundings in cooperation inside and outside the organisation. (Subir chowdbhury management, 21c financial times prentice hall (2000)