Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Climate change in australia essay
Climate change in australia essay
Climate change in australia essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Climate change in australia essay
Securitization and Human Society in Australia: Climate Change
Versus Undocumented Migration
Introduction
States exist to protect their citizens from all security threats. To insure security, states have devised various machineries that facilitate response to insecurity with urgency. Australia is no different. The state has the constitutional mandate to secure its people. Australians have legitimate expectation that their government will protect them from any actor that threatens their survival. Yet, the government cannot fully address these security threats if it cannot identify them, prioritize, and act concertedly on them. The most common discourse amongst security analyst is what, between undocumented migration and climate change, poses the greatest security threat to Australian in the 21st century. This paper will delve into this debate and demonstrates that the two concepts are not mutually exclusive. Rather, their interplay has an exacerbating effect on security threat. To do this effectively, the paper will employ securitization theory as the analytical lens.
Theoretical Perspectives: Securitization
Securitization theory, an international relations theory, encompasses Copenhagen and Aberystwyth schools of thought. It conceptualizes security as an act of survival. For something to fall within the confines of security, it must be detrimental to existence of another object. The theory is essentially problem solving. It visualizes security threat as interplay of various aspects, political, social, economic, and environmental. When the state and other international players ensure that these aspects are functional, security threats diminish. Politics, regional and international, must exorcise security issues from politics an...
... middle of paper ...
...r migration and law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Freilich, J. D., and Guerette, R. T., Migration, culture conflict, crime, and terrorism, Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2006.
Guild, E., Security and Migration in the 21st Century, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.
Huysmans, J.,The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, London: Routledge, 2006.
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Australia-New Zealand & Southeast Asia relations: An agenda for closer cooperation, Singapore: ISEAS, 2004.
McAdam, J., Climate Change, Forced Migration, and International Law, Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2012.
Scheffran, J., Climate change, human security and violent conflict: Challenges for societal stability, Berlin: Springer, 2012.
Zahar, A., Peel, J., and Godden, L., Australian climate law in global context, Cambridge, England: Port Melbourne, 2012.
Bucerius, Sandra and Tonry, Michael. The Oxford Handbook of Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.
The article by Rob Guerette is a case study involving the widely-reported increase of immigration into the United States. It tackles migration issues as well as related issues such as border security , security initiatives by individuals.. The article also provides in-depth research about the impact of illegal immigration into the United States including migrant deaths, deaths of non-migrants at the border, border security and the challenges faced by United States border patrol officers. The main purpose of the article was to provide an explanation as to whether the Border Patrol has any effect in saving the lives of people attempting to enter into the United States (Guerette, 2007).
It was the event that strengthened both constituents and politicians’ perception of outsiders as threats. Additionally, the media played into the exagerration. Both articles showed that public opinion changed to reflect this fear of immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers in both countries. For example, two-thirds of Canadians and three-quarters of Australians supported the idea of stronger control of borders to deter terrorists from entering (Adelman 15; Hugo 37). Thomas Faist argues that this inclination to tighten up borders due to the perception of threat of migrants is “inconclusive” (Faist 10). This excuse is used to circumvent the “stereotypes about cultural fears and clashes” (Faist 8) citizens have of outsiders. Although the policies of both states were critizied by people, including lawyers and organizations, it is key to note that enough people supported and even elected representatives that introduced and ratified such
3. E. B. Skolnikoff, Same Science, Differing Policies: The Saga of Global Climate Change, Cambridge, Mass., 1997
Wenger, A & Mauer, V. 'The Radicalization of Diasporas and Terrorism'. ZUR SICHERHEITSPOLITIK. NO 80. Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich. 2009. Retrieved 7 April 2011 < www.css.ethz.ch/publications>
Long, Robert Emmet.Immigration. Dublin: H. W. Wilson, 1996. Purcell, L. Edward. Immigration. Phoenix: Oryx, 1995.
Gilbert, P. (1994). Terrorism, security, and nationality an introductory study in applied political philosophy. London: Routledge.
Vaughan, Jessica M. “Aliens Who Overstay Their Visas Are a Serious Security Threat.” Opposing Viewpoints: Immigration. Eds. David M. Haugen, Susan Musser and Kacy Lovelace. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2009. 182-193. Print.
Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security. Cambridge: President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995. 71-81. Print.
The purpose of this paper is that to highlight what I see as racist, unjust and inhumane elements in Britain’s immigration system and the culture of secrecy surrounds it. The permanent residents (who has indefinite leave to remain), central to this discussion not the illegal immigrants and bogus asylum seekers. Also immigration’s treatments of people coming over to Britain for a range of other reasons and with papers and visas they expect to be accepted have been highlighted.
There is no longer any question that our world climate has changed (King, 2004). Over the last 100 years, "temperatures have risen by about 0.6 degrees Celsius and global sea level has risen by about 20cm" (K...
Dale Jamieson, philosopher and author of the book, Reason in a Dark Time, argues that we have sold our souls to the climate change devil and will be stuck with this problem for eternity. However, just because we are stuck with climate change, Jamieson argues, we should not give up on trying to slow down its effects. In addition to Jamieson, the Federal Republic of Germany also believes that we are stuck with climate change and have developed their own solutions to help mitigate the effects. Throughout this paper, I will present a descriptive and normative analysis to help address the environmental justice claims that both entities are making. While Jamieson addresses many reasons why we are stuck with climate change, his strongest argument is found in the fact that we as humans are not evolutionarily designed to process issues that occur on such a long time scale.
The topic for discussion in this work is enshrined in U.S. Coast Guard mission challenges. The topic for research is “Enforcement Seams Caused by Differing Laws, Policies & Procedures in relation to Immigration” (U.S. Coast Guard Office of Law Enforcement. 2011, p. 6). According to Bush (2003), the security situation in the world is challenged by ever increasing global terrorism. Introduction of counterfeit products, the need for reinforcement of anti-dumping policies, drug and human trafficking remains a real threat in U.S. (U.S. Customs and Border Protection [CBP]. 2013). Sometimes, balancing between ethics and regional safety remains an elusive aspect (Bush, 2003). Ethical...
Illegal immigration is getting into a foreign country without the required authentication or living beyond the period speculated within the authentication document. The world as a whole is facing a challenge on how to handle the cases of immigration. The latest development in immigration cases is what is currently happening in the Mediterranean Sea where Africans are migrating into Europe illegally. This paper will, however, not look into the case in Europe but rather what is happening in America at the moment. The paper will analyze immigration in America, why people immigrate to America and how the challenge can be mitigated without causing a lot of harm to the society. This paper will, therefore, take a keen interest what is happening on the America-Mexico border.
Some may consider migrants as, “foreign-born, foreign nationals, or people who have moved to the UK for a year or more.” (Anderson) However, as anyone who visits London will quickly learn, it is not easy to walk down the street and identify who is an immigrant and who is not. It could be that the Indian worker in the local pound shop moved to London when he or she was only a few months old, or just as easily, it could be that he or she only moved here a few months ago. The issue of immigrant discrimination raises the issues of defining who immigrants are, what their worth to society is, and what we should do about immigration. The line between who society considers, or should consider, an immigrant and who is not must be adapted to incite any sort of real change. Changing language in legal documents regarding immigration can only do so much, but when it comes to a Pakistani with dark skin and a foreign-sounding name applying for a job at a local British law firm in competition with white skinned Joe Bloggs from Battersea, there continues to be