Section 42 Essay

757 Words2 Pages

A change in section 42(1)(b) to reflect this change in the substantive law would now seem to be necessary; however, it is not clear how much difference such a change would make. The difficulty with section 1(2) is that it could empty the reasonableness test of most of its content (Temkin and Ashworth, 2004). Much will now depend on how the phrase “all the circumstances” is interpreted. It might be thought to be an invitation to the jury to scrutinise C’s behaviour to determine whether there was anything about it which could have induced a reasonable belief in consent. Is C’s sexual history to be taken to be a relevant part of the circumstances? In answer to a question raised in Committee, the Minister agreed that the section “should focus the …show more content…

Under section 42(1)(a), “relevant issue in the case” means any issue falling to be proved by the prosecution or defence in the trial of the accused”. This phrase is potentially capable of a broad construction. Thus, if C’s motivation became an issue in the case, it would, arguably, be possible to question her about previous sexual behaviour if this were relevant to it. It remains to be seen whether the courts will accept such an argument. Lord Hope in R v A considered that section 41(3)(a) was a gateway to admitting evidence of motive to lie38 but this was not the view taken in R v Mokrecovas.39 In R v Floyd Charles Darnell40, defence counsel, relying on Lord Hope’s remarks, suggested that a very wide interpretation should be given to section 42(1)(a). The Court of Appeal did not consider it necessary to explore the matter in this case but commented that if evidence could be admitted under section 42(1)(a) as indicative of a motive to lie, it was not clear how this could be reconciled with section 41(4), which forbids evidence the purpose or main purpose of which is to impugn C’s credibility. In R v Martin (Durwayne)41, the Court of Appeal found a way of circumventing this problem. D, who was charged with indecent assault, denied any contact with C on the occasion in question, claiming he

Open Document