The following is a gathering of reports provided by the Lifeline University Chemistry and Biology faculty. Those who were directly involved and or witnessed the events have been questioned about what took place, why, where, when, and how. Each account has been documented and stored for investigative purposes only, there will be no public access to the information in this document provided by Blue’sClues Inc. All findings are to be reported strictly to Dr. James Doe, Vice President for Institutional Safety and Awareness of Lifeline University. Reports from faculty have stated that there have been 10 incidents. These incidents span from 2011 to 2015 with a sum of $18,576 in damage. Faculty has stated that these incidents …show more content…
has gathered and organized to visually project the frequency and type of incidents that has occurred in the past 5 years dating from 2011 to 2015. Hazardous waste spills appear to have happened more often from 2011 to 2012 and have been reported 4 times within 2 years. From 2012 to 2013 there have been 2 hazardous waste spills and 1 theft. Reports have shown that there has been 2 hazardous waste spills with fire damage from 2013 to 2014. Lastly, from 2014 to 2015 there has been 1 theft. Lifeline University records show that the last inspection of the Occupational Safety & Health Awareness (OSHA) department was in September 2014. There has been a noticeable change in incidents that have been reported from 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 compared to 2011- 2012 and 2012-2013. The number and type of incidents have decreased starting from 2013 and ending in 2015. Lifeline University records have also stated that the last training session faculty received on safety awareness was in the academic year 2012, this may be linked to the number of incidents ranging from 2011 to 2013. The chart above depicts the estimated damage costs, the sum of all of these costs is
CQ Researcher published the article. They are an authority with where they stand in the world; meaning they are very informational and helpful. It is scholarly reviewed. By comparing it to my other sources, this source has more information and helps a lot more than the rest of my sources. The article is objective and informational. The goal of this article is to inform people on the statistics and how we can help lower the numbers.
Despite their methodological differences, GSS data and those of the UCR have shown similar trends over the decade between 2004 and 2014. “For example, the GSS shows a 28 percent decline in the rate of violent victimization and a 42% decline in the rate of household victimization. In comparison, the UCR stated a 26 percent decrease in the rate of violent crimes and a 40% decrease in the rate of crime against property” (Perrault, 2015, p.7). In general, victimization rates in both surveys tend to be lower in the eastern and higher in the western part of Canada. “Less than one in three (31 percent) criminal incidents were reported to the police in 2014. This proportion was slightly lower than that recorded ten years earlier (34 percent)” (Perrault, 2015, p.27). Many incidents are not reported, because people feel that the police cannot help with the situation, or they may feel embarrassed. The crime rates appear to be higher for minor incidents, such as property or household crimes in comparison to serious violent crimes in both surveys over the years of
...ebruary). Bureau of Justice Statistic. Homicide trends in the United States, 1980-2008. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2221.
Use of Force Reporting face page sent to OPD notification list on 26 Jun 16
...e are now regulations in place dealing with casings and other equipment (Regulations). If there were more regulations like this, there might be less breaks and les contamination. There might also be less spills or related accidents if there were more regulations on the disposing of these dangerous chemicals. How the chemicals are being disposed of should be monitored (Howells).
In this time-series design, history is a main concern because there might be events that affect intimate partner homicide rates other than the handgun restriction laws. For example, states without a handgun restriction law may be affected by the federal laws. Within states, there might be several laws for other types of crime. Changes in articles and laws are also history threats. On the other hand, threats to external validity are less likely in this study, but it should be confirmed that the data used in analyses are accurate. Again, missing data imputation seems critical to maximize the external validity of the data.
Cohen, L. E. & Felson, M. (1979). “Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach,” American Sociological Review 44:588-608.
16 Oct. 2013. While this is a blog post, it is from a very professional site that specializes in
67. Politicians, responding to the nations fear of crime, have attempted to outdo each other in being “tougher of crime”. This attention toward our nations fear of crime has resulted in the addition of police officers, the building of more prisons, extending the death penalty to cover sixty federal offenses, and mandating longer sentences. The homicide rate in the United States was more than twice the homicide rate in Canada and many times that in other countries. However, the victimization rates for assault and robbery were lower for Americans than for Canadians, Australians, and Spaniards. Outbreaks of violence have occurred throughout history starting with the post-Civil War era. This was eventually followed by organized crime and an increase in the murder rate throughout the 1930’s. During the 1950’s crime rates decreased only to increase once again in the 1980’s. Today crime rates are down whether Americans choose to accept this or not. Murder rates are well below the record setting 1930’s and violent crime has decreased 33 % since 1993.
Why the decline in crime in the 1990s? Many plausible explanations have been reported (and given short shrift by the authors), including higher conviction rates and longer prison terms which are keeping repeat offenders off the streets, more police and better policing strategies, decline in the crack cocaine trade and higher expenditures in victim precautions like security guards, alarms, car theft devices, etc.
Production and distribution continued despite recognizing that a serious fire hazard existed when the Pinto suffered a collision
National Center for Victims of Crime. (2001). Primary crime prevention. Retrieved December 2, 2013, from http://www.safetycops.com/crime_prevention.htm
is truly not the case, these are legitimate places of business, ran n accordance to all health
The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes cover rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes cover burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. The data from the NCVS survey are particularly useful for calculating crime rates, both aggregated and disaggregated, and for determining changes in crime rates from year to year.