Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Turning off the school-to-prison pipeline harry wilson
Student safety in school
Turning off the school-to-prison pipeline harry wilson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Education is said to be one of the most important things in life. We are told to go to school every day so that we can better ourselves and to learn something new. That is no longer the case. Education is not the topic of concern or interest anymore, now interest is being turned towards prison and funding them. The criminal justice system connects prisons to schools through a system called the school to prison pipeline. According to the American Civil liberties Union (ACLU), the school-to-prison pipeline refers to “the policies and practices that push our nation’s school children, especially our most at- risk children, out of class rooms and into the juvenile and criminal justice systems.” The school-to prison pipeline focuses more on putting …show more content…
Public schools have overcrowded classrooms, unqualified teachers, and insufficient funding for extra things. These extras include special education teachers and services, and even textbooks. The inadequate resources help increase dropout rates and disengagements. Zero tolerance policies are also a cause for the flow of children through the pipeline. Schools have embraced zero-tolerance policies that automatically impose severe punishment regardless of circumstances (ACLU). The zero-tolerance policies were adopted due to the 1999 Columbine High School shooting. Zero-tolerance policies have resulted in increased expulsion and suspension rates. Children are being punished harshly for disruptive behavior, bringing in nail clippers to school, or even being in the hallways during class hours. Schools with little resources rely heavily on police in the schools to enforce discipline rather than teachers, principals, counselors and administrators (ACLU). Due to police monitoring the hallways and schools children are more likely to have a school-based arrest. These arrests are usually for non-violent offenses. These school-based arrests are one of the quickest routes through the pipeline and into the criminal justice …show more content…
The No Child Left Behind act was implemented in 2002. According to the National Education Budget Project, NCLB requires states to test students annually and requires states, school districts and schools to ensure that all students are proficient at grade level. The state defines what grade-level performance is and are accountable to make sure the students achieve it. The Advancement Project article “No Child Left Behind Catalyzes” states, “No Child Left Behind’s ‘get tough’ approach to accountability has led to more students being left behind, thus further feeding the dropout crisis and the School-to-Prison Pipeline”. NCLB has made schools less effective and worsened the environment. It has led to a decrease in graduation rates, and slower rates of academic improvement and of closing racial achievement gaps. The NCLB has helped contribute to the encouragement of zero-tolerance policies, record high suspension and expulsion rates, and sharp rises of school based arrests and referral of students to law
In today’s society mainly anyone growing up in poverty stricken communities, single parent homes, domestic violence or infested and drug infested areas are at risk to being abducted by the school to prison pipeline. The school to prison pipeline is a system designed for at risk teens that do not do well in school. The effect is them being thrown in jail. Economically the black and the Latino community constantly after generation and generation are getting dealt the same hand because each child in the new generation is growing up in a broken home and are falling victim to the same problems that the generation before them have faced. By compiling annual reports on the total number of disciplinary
For my second article review I decided to do mine over the article Harry Wilson titled Turning off the School-to-Prison Pipeline. The main theme that this particular article deals with is how our school systems have become a direct pipeline for kids to end up in prison and the way to break this pipeline is through our schools changing certain policies they operate by. The main topic of this article that the author talks about frequently that contributes to the “pipeline” is the zero tolerance rule that school systems follow. The author speaks frequently about how the zero tolerance policy is a key factor to the school-to-prison pipeline being eliminated. Throughout the entire duration of the article the reader can expect to be confronted with
If you did not know, the zero tolerance policy is when students break school behavior rules and strict regulations created by the district or school and get severe consequences for it. Carla Amurao, the author of the article, “Fact Sheet: How Bad Is the School-to-Prison Pipeline?”, stated that “statistics reflect that these policies disproportionately target students of color”. Students of color are being affected so badly by this policy, that statistics show black students are 3 times more likely to get expelled than white students. Since these students are being expelled or arrested for breaking zero tolerance policy rules, they are missing valuable information in classes due to court hearings. But, some people argue that the zero tolerance policy is unfair to all students, making the education system equal for all to succeed. For example, a “2007 study by the Advancement Project and the Power U Center for Social Change says that for every 100 students who were suspended, 15 were Black, 7.9 were American Indian, 6.8 were Latino and 4.8 were white”. As you can see, the zero tolerance policy affects all races, making them miss their education because of certain consequences. Because the mindset of these people is that, if the zero-tolerance policy does not affect just one race or group of people, then the education system
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.
The school to prison pipeline, is a term used to describe the alarmingly increasing number of students having contact with the juvenile criminal court systems, because of the implemented zero tolerance policies
The policy “No Child Left Behind (NCLB)” is a policy where Federal legislation has mandated that children be tested, and where there is compliance with standards. Simply means, that all children must meet standards. The standards are defined by the states, and all children will be subject to testing, starting from as early as third grade. The students will be tested annually, in order to ensure that they are getting the type of education that they are entitled to, as determined by their performance on standardized tests.
...a clear definition for what the school-to-prison pipeline is and why it continues to exist. I see the issues that have proceeded because of this policy. The research gives me an advantage of providing the unconstitutional wrongdoings. This is not an issue just morally wrong, it is unjust. Literature provides me with information on why courts are not taking action as well as possible solutions to endure without depending on legislators to take actions. The school-to-prison pipeline has a direct target and the literature also contributes information on who that target group is and why they are so easily targeted.
Lawmakers and school officials have been wearisome in the efforts of finding a policy that works to make our schools a safer place for students and administrators. Schools, both public and private, are an environment for learning and pleasant experiences that a child or adolescent will remember for the rest of their lives. Although, experiences like the Columbine High school massacres are not what an individual would want to remember and is one of the most significant enforcer when it comes to all austere policies. Zero tolerance was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan’s
The school to prison pipeline is a phenomenon that refers to the practices and policies that have pushed school children, especially the most at-risk children, out of classrooms and into the juvenile justice system. This disturbing occurrence indicates the prioritization of incarceration over the education of children. Most alarmingly, many of the children being targeted have learning disabilities or histories of poverty, abuse or neglect. Instead of being targeted, these children would much rather benefit from additional counseling and educational services. Moreover, the knowledge acquired in this course will be incorporated in this paper and used to explain the points made. In this term paper, what will be discussed is the expansion of the zero tolerance policy, the different views on the policy, who is mostly targeted, the effects on the juveniles and any alternative solutions that could diminish this dismaying occurrence for becoming a larger problem.
The school-to-prison pipeline is the idea that schools funnel students into the prison system. This theory is narrow-minded and ignores how the government benefits from the surveillance of African Americans. With the imagery of a pipe, this complex issue is reduced to the single-minded idea that schools force people of color, most notably African Americans, and does not discuss the evolution of the larger society. The way society has evolved to discriminate against African Americans at the institutional level is a key factor in the increased incarceration rates. The school-to-prison pipeline is an outdated and prejudiced model that does not fully explain the situation many African Americans face.
Gabbard’s (2013) application of zero tolerance policies goes hand in hand with this phenomenon known as the school-to-prison pipeline (STPP). Archer (2009:868) defines the STPP as “the collection of education and public safety policies and practices that push our nation’s schoolchildren out of the classroom and into the streets, the juvenile justice system, or the criminal justice system.” When Fowler (2011:16) studied the STPP, they concluded that “...the single greatest predictor of future involvement in the juvenile system is a history of disciplinary referrals at school.” Because of its huge predictor of criminality, this is a serious issue that must be analyzed to prevent a catastrophic and vicious cycle that forces society’s children out of school, int...
Tulman, J. B. (2008). Time to Reverse the School-to-Prison Pipeline. (Cover story). Policy & Practice (19426828), 66(1), 22-27.
Khadaroo, Teicher. A. “School suspensions: Does racial bias feed the school-to-prison pipeline?” The Christian Science Monitor. March 31, 2013. Web.
It is forcing these kids and adolescents to get involved in crime, have behavior issues in school, causing trouble in the community because there is no outlet for these kids or adolescents to talk and being shown some compassion. Single parents are choosing between labors and being an effective parent in their children lives. The school prison pipeline is one of the policies that have negative outcomes and does not solve the problem instead it is basically pushing away the
A controversial issue in the criminal justice field is whether or not educational programs should be offered to inmates in jail while they are incarcerated. While some might argue that taxpayers should not be forced to fund these types of programs, others agree that it is extremely beneficial to not only the inmates but also the taxpayers. Not only are the inmates the people in society who need education the most, but studies have shown a significant decrease in the recidivism rate of inmates who participated in educational programs while incarcerated. Jails and prisons should increase educational programs to inmates because inmates need education more than ever, it is more financially efficient to provide educational programs and it significantly reduces the recidivism rate.