Salville Pros And Cons

2101 Words5 Pages

Drive-Ins started to develop even more and began to make their own systems, techniques, and policies, Sal-Val being one of the first extremely prosperous ones. The Sal-Val was opened on June 10th, 1938 just outside of Burbank, California and was owned by the California Drive-In Theatres Corporation. Six hundred eighteen cars in nine rows was the capacity of the ten-acre lot, which cost $54,563 to build. The screen area was made out of metal-lath-and-plaster covered with lightweight canvas bedded in white lead and painted a flat white. Between each ramp was a distance of forty feet and the projector was one hundred eighty six feet away from the screen. Like other later ozoners, the projection booth was two to three feet underground to minimize …show more content…

The first ozoner to be charged because of noise disturbance was at Guy Douthwaite’s ozoner, which could be heard one mile away. This violated an ordinance made in the drive-in’s city, Los Angeles, which made it a misdemeanor to have a stadium that sound could be heard fifty or more feet away. Douthwaite argued to the Supreme Court that this was discriminating drive-ins but the court did not agree, and they sent him to municipal court for trial. On June 4th, 1935, Douthwaite was going to have the choice of a fine of $250 or going to jail for ninety days but the case was suspended as long as it didn’t reoccur. A separate case in Detroit was filed and dropped once a reporter went to the drive-in to see how bad the sound was and he said that you could barely hear anything at fifty feet away from the ozoner. Another significant lawsuit which was in Pennsylvania with complaints about noise from the Bethal Township. Residents said that you witnessed the nerve-destroying noise from one mile away and they couldn’t sleep until the films were over at one in the morning. The defense pleaded that the drive-in was just like open dance floors and that they spent $30,000 on constructing the theatre. Spending half a million dollars on their homes was the plaintiffs’ argument. These cases were only three out of the one hundred drive-ins that went to court in 1940 for restraining orders. To …show more content…

To block patents, the indoors held secret meetings and tried to persuade the citizens that they were paying extra taxes just to pay for the police at the drive-ins. David Flexer was furious once he found out that the indoors undertook these actions to eliminate the ozoners. Flexer said that the independents tried to bring down competition, told film distributors not to sell to him, told state officials to stop projects and to bring up health issues. Three years later, in Twin City, the independents owned four drive-ins, that showed low, cheap, runs, to not take away audience from the indoors. This also contributed to the fact that film distributors favored indoors, rather than ozoners, because they bought higher, more expensive, runs

Open Document