Russian Winter Dbq

1427 Words3 Pages

Whenever we talk about World War II, we would almost always account the Allies’ victory to the Soviets, the turning point being the Battle of Stalingrad and Battle of Kursk. The Internet and social media would instinctively compare the Germans’ failure to conquer the Soviet Union in 1941 to Napoleon’s failure to conquer the Russian Empire in 1812, with many memes mocking both rulers of their own countries. The most obvious thing about every of such memes is how they underestimated the drastically cold Russian Winter, and hence became the turning point for both demises. However, is the Russian Winter really the main reason for Hitler’s failure to conquer the USSR? After all, plain weather patterns cannot explain the loss of a powerful nation, …show more content…

A lot of evidence does seem to prove this. Source A shows the fact about the winter of Russia, in which claiming that 1941 and 1942 were the coldest winters in the entire 20th century. Source B shows that in December 1941, during the Battle of Moscow, temperatures reached -37oC, with recounts of soldiers having their fingers being completely frozen or fingers freezing at the triggers if they weren’t wearing a glove. This shows how the extreme coldness of the winters in 1941 and 1942 and greatly affected the performance of the soldiers of the Wehrmacht, not only causing them deep pain due to frostbite, which even caused their fingers to be frozen or break off, but also caused soldiers to use fuels which was supposed to be used for the vehicles and tanks to warm themselves up. The Battle of Stalingrad and Battle of Moscow, battles that happened during the winter, had relatively more deaths than previous battles, such as the Battle of Kiev and Battle of Minsk. Source C shows the total deaths in each battle other than Minsk. The battle of Stalingrad had about 1.1 million axis casualties, the battle of Moscow had about 180,000 to 400,000 deaths while the Battle of Kiev only had 128,000 deaths. Moreover, these ‘winter battles’ also took a longer time to finish compared to the Battle of Minsk while only last 2 weeks and Kiev lasted 1 month whereas the Battle of Moscow took 3 months …show more content…

After the successes of the Fall of France in 1940, Hitler decided to promote himself as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the German Army, controlling every operation. This was a huge mistake considering Hitler’s short military campaign in the First World War. After all, he was only a corporal after 4 years in the Great War, in fact he was only a dispatch runner, meaning his role was to send message from fronts to fronts. Hence, meaning that he has very little combat experience let alone commanding an entire army. However, he felt he was superior to the other generals, such as Guderian and Manstein, despite them actually carrying higher ranks than him from the First World War, and it was their plans and strategies that brought about the success of blitzkrieg in Poland and the Low Countries. This resulted in many military blunders committed which had resulted in deadly consequences. One of these, is the invasion of Stalingrad. Stalingrad had little military purpose, most believed Hitler only wanted to conquer the city for the sake of conquering a city with the name of the Soviet leader. And the result was deadly due to splitting of forces, which resulted in the turning point of the war. Not only that, Hitler’s defeatism attitude, not allowing soldiers to retreat and to fight to the last man, resulted in many unnecessary deaths. This is the main reason for the destruction of the 6th army, the army that

Open Document