Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead, A Satirical Piece That Parodies Hamle

917 Words2 Pages

The purpose of satire is to point out human flaws in a humorous way in order to instruct and possibly change humanity. A parody is a literary or artistic work that imitates the characteristic styles of an author or a work for comic affect or ridicule. Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead is a satirical piece of work that parodies Hamlet, especially in terms of death, a common theme in both. These two plays take different views on death portrayed by the protagonists of each: either Hamlet or Rosencrantz & Guildenstern.
Hamlet is a tragedy with comedy elements in it. It is about a prince who seeks revenge for his father’s assassination, but in the end, he dies. Throughout the entire play, Hamlet is in constant conflict within his mind. He doesn’t know what to believe or how to act. He ponders whether or not he should kill himself. He plots the best way to get his revenge. Hamlet revolves around death. Hamlet takes a serious attitude towards death. In Hamlet, there is some black humor about death. For example, it is used in the Yorick scene, and it is implied that Polarius is “not where he eats but where he is eaten.” Hamlet uses black humor to lighten the mood about death. It is a terrible topic for him and one that makes him sad, so joking about it makes it easier to accept. Hamlet has free will, so he feels like he has some control over his death and that of others. He almost chose to take his own life when he was contemplating suicide. He chose to take his uncle-father Claudius’s life after his father’s ghost told him Claudius was his murderer. Hamlet holds death to certain standards; he sees it as a serious matter. Because of this, he takes his revenge seriously, plotting when the best moment is to kill Cl...

... middle of paper ...

.... Hamlet works hard to bring Claudius to his end. He has motivation and takes control of his own fate. On the other hand, Rosencrantz & Guildenstern take a carefree attitude towards death. They believe fate will accomplish what it wants, so there is no point trying to change it. They accept death and do not fuss about it. After all, in a way they are already dead so dying physically isn’t a big deal. Both plays make the audience think about what they believe about death and how they are living their lives. It is likely that everyone has their own different take on death after reading or viewing these plays. That is what these playwrights wanted. The plays make us look at our lives and how we are living them. Are we happy with it? Will we take hold of our lives and be productive members of society? Or will we waste away our lives and be mere existences?

Open Document