Rorschach As A Tragic Hero

977 Words2 Pages

Even though there are superheroes existent in the Watchmen universe, a majority are human and thus exhibit routine human characteristics. They frequently “ponder what sort of person would put on fancy dress and punch muggers every evening,” but when they do themselves, their flaws shine though the costume, causing them to commit questionable actions (Barber). They are not perfect heroes, exposed by the fact that Moore created them as shadows of well-known superheroes like Batman, Superman, and Iron Man (Barber). Furthermore, there are no clear protagonists or antagonists because each character battles their own morality, adding to the human factor of the novel (Wu). Hence, humanity’s worth can be distinguished through an analysis of the morals …show more content…

Compared to the caped crusader, Rorschach poses a violent set of morals that separates him from his colleagues; he sees the world as a blank slate that renders him to believe that there is no set inherent standard of morals, but rather the ones that people impose upon themselves (Wu). His morals align with his troublesome past of being tormented by his mother, who was a prostitute, and by children that teased him, which leads him to see the world in a black and white fashion, as his face mask displays. The history behind the mask also aligns with his morals; as revealed through his psychological evaluation by Dr. Malcolm Long, it was originally a dress for a woman named Kitty Genovese, but she was raped and murdered (Moore and Gibbons Ch. VI, 10). Long questions Rorschach on whether “what happened to Kitty Genovese [is] really proof that the whole of mankind is rotten” and further evaluates that Rorschach has been “conditioned with a negative world view [because] [t]here are good people too…” (Moore and Gibbons, Ch. VI, 11). This deduction additionally exposes Kovacs’ black and white viewpoint because he concludes that “life is inherently meaningless” (Wu). Thus, there are no good people in the world, but rather those like Long who are selfish and want to “get [their] name in the journals” (Moore and Gibbons, Ch. VI, 11). In this way, Rorschach’s point of view supports the idea …show more content…

In the novel, he is introduced as the smartest man alive, much like Iron Man in the Marvel Universe (Barber). His morals lie on the basis of long-term goals rather than short-term, which explains his ease with decimating half of the population of New York in order to supposedly save humanity (Wu). Ozymandias claims that he has “struggled across the back of murdered innocents to save humanity…but someone had to take the weight of that awful, necessary crime,” that someone being himself (Moore and Gibbons, Ch. XII, 27). He feels that for mankind to advance, there must be a significant cost that resets the cycle of humanity, essentially allowing him to create a kingdom in homage to his namesakes: Alexander the Great and Ramses II. In this twisted mindset, he argues that humanity is worth saving, but his justifications are selfish; the only reason he makes such an effort is because he wants to feel that his existence in the world is valuable (Wu). After he drops the bomb on New York he asks Doctor Manhattan “I did the right thing, didn’t I?” (Moore and Gibbons, Ch. XII, 27), suggesting that he cannot justify his actions, but rather is content with the idea that he has made a difference (Wu). In this way, Veidt examples humanity’s self-indulgence; although we do not employ such drastic efforts to save ourselves, the exertions are done in vain. Therefore,

More about Rorschach As A Tragic Hero

Open Document