Romeo and Juliet Movie Adaptation Comparison
Shakespeare is a literary genius that wrote nearly 38 plays throughout his lifetime. All of these plays are critically acclaimed and are the basis for many different works of art found throughout the years. It is amazing to see how long the legacy of his works have lasted and what has been produced with those works in mind. Shakespeare wrote plays and plays were meant to be acted. The start of the late 1800’s brought about the creation of the cinema. What better way to portray Shakespeare plays then movies? The beauty of the cinema is that the director can make any changes where he/she deems necessary. This may include tweaking the set or costumes or may even include changing the plot or the entire
…show more content…
The set and feel of the play were not much different than what Shakespeare originally intended them to be. For example, Shakespeare wrote in Romeo and Juliet that the play takes place in Verona, Italy. This is true for the Zefferelli play. He uses the same set style as the one intended to be used by Shakespeare. In the prologue of the play written by Shakespeare, it clearly states, “In fair Verona, where we lay our scene,” (Prologue.9). Zefferelli accomplishes his task of portraying the original play perfectly. It is shown in the very first scene of the movie that the movie takes place in Verona, Italy. The set is a dry, arid town square with people bustling about around the small shops. This is very much similar to the look and feel of a 14 or 15 century Italian town square. It is presumed that the play was meant to be set near the 14 or 15th centuries so that set in the movie makes quite a bit of sense. The Zefferelli movie was directed in Rome which is also an Italian town. In the Luhrmann adaptation, we fail to see this similarity. He decides to modernize the play making it seem like it takes place in the late 1900’s or early 2000’s. He adds in a California setting with a 21st century feel. With the addition of cars, guns, helicopters and other inventions not known at the time, the movie is very modern compared to the Zefferelli version. This is not what
Act One of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare The play Romeo and Juliet is set in "fair Verona" in Italy. Shakespeare based his play on a poem by Brooke and brought it to the theatres in 1595. Although the play is set in Italy many things mentioned could be found in Elizabethan England, for example the Capulet's party. This suggests to me that Shakespeare had little knowledge of Italian life and culture.
A Comparison of the Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet I have been studying the prologue to 'Romeo and Juliet' written by the magnificent playwright, William Shakespeare sometime between 1594 and 1596. Still globally acknowledged, it has been restyled by many directors for both stage and screen. Shakespeare starts his play with a prologue: an introduction to a play or other piece of writing. The prologue sets the tone of the theatrical production; it outlines
One of the most celebrated plays in history, “Romeo and Juliet”, was written by William Shakespeare in the late 16th century. It is a story about two lovers that have to meet in secret because of an ongoing family feud. Tragically, because of their forbidden love Romeo and Juliet take their lives so they can be together. In 1997, a movie was adapted from the play “Romeo and Juliet”, directed by Baz Lurhmann. However, as alike as the movie and the play are, they are also relatively different.
Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book & nbsp; Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet was written. centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo. and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a better presentation of the. & nbsp; One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet is very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4).
The pace in which the The film goes very fast and it changes from one location to the next in a sequence of images, which occurs a lot during this recent film. In Franco Zeffirelli’s adaptation of the film, there are very similar. settings as they are both set in Verona but they have a different timescale and time period in which the film was produced. In the beginning of Act two Scene ii (the balcony scene), Romeo.... ...
The key moments I have noticed were the repetition of the crowd scenes and the camera focused on what is happening at the time in the town. The way the film invites us in a particular way captures the audience into the characters worlds and how they live from their own judgments. “Lies in being able to observe reality, not to extract fictions from it”. I examined that I was able to extract observational shots straight away and was able to observe reality quickly. Long takes which indicates the deep focus which suggests the realism in the film. The film shows the uncaring system is the reality of Italy, but they do not want this to be exploited. The desperate need for he...
Cartmell, Deborah. “Franco Zeffirelli and Shakespeare.” The Cambridge Campanion to Shakespeare on Film. Ed. Russell Jackson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 212-221. Print.
In the past, Shakespeare was the backbone of the Elizabethan era, captivating his audiences’ hearts with his tissue-box-grabbing performance, and Luhrmann has made him proud with his heartfelt adaptation that keeps modern audiences entertained.
One of the greatest questions addressed in both Romeo and Juliet and Shakespeare in Love is the question "does love conquer all?" Should one follow his heart or should one conform to society's view as to what is proper? In the movie, love does in fact conquer all, but, in the play, it does not. In the play Romeo and Juliet decide to follow their hearts and they do not conform to society's wishes. Romeo and Juliet end up dead and the feud between the Montagues and Capulets is over. In the case of Shakespeare in Love, Will loses Viola but his love for her lives on as seen in his later writings. So, one could argue that in some instances love does indeed conquer all and, in other cases, it does not. Following the path of true love can be a tragic one as seen in Romeo and Juliet. As for Shakespeare in Love, both characters meet society's wishes and therefore return to their normal lives never being quite the same.
Lurhmann sets the film in a fictitious border city between the United States and Mexico. The city is called ‘Verona’ so it maintains its original name from the play. It is extremely built-up and urban just like New York or London so that a modern audience can relate to the film and understand where the film is set. In other modern films, a big urban city is usually the setting where there are big gang rivalries and Lurhmann makes this clear by showing that the Montague’s and Capulet’s are the big two families in the city and they are not to be reckoned with.
Zeffirelli sets his film in a spectacular location, a castle on an outcropping of the coast in northern Scotland, on top of a rock nearly surrounded by the sea (Hinson). The castle has a great look to it, both inside and outside. There was rain and mist, and the characters
Romeo and Juliet, a story of a tragic romance between two young lovers. And within the story you find that it is different from the book to the movie. While reading the book you notice some differences between it and the movie. While watching the movie you see one difference and it is that instead of swords like the book they have guns and they called them swords. They did this as a result of the movie is in a more modern time than the book. Another difference is when Mercutio is making Romeo go to the party. In the book he talks him into going to the party. In the movie Mercutio made him take a tablet or pill of some kind to make him go. Still the same as the other difference, still in a more modern era.
The different sets used by both directors are another way of showing how different each version is. Zefirelli set his version in Italy, and based it in the 16th centu...
Between Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet, and Carlo Carlei’s version of Romeo and Juliet, Carlo Carlei’s version takes the cake. First of all the film by Baz Luhrmann was very distant to the setting in which William Shakespeare had written it, because they use guns instead of swords. Secondly, The set that was used for Baz Luhrmann’s version was not in Italy at all, instead it was filmed in mexico, and the U.S. Lastly, the actor that Carlo chose to play benvolio was way better than the actor in Baz’s version, because he didn’t look like a high school bully. What do you think of when you hear Romeo and Juliet, you think of old tragedy with swordplay, and heartbreak, right?
The movie version of Romeo and Juliet stars two popular young actors, Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes. In some ways it is very much like the original, but at the same time very different.