Romeo And Juliet: Is Violence The Answer?

862 Words2 Pages

Is Violence the Answer? "Nations have frequently won their independence in battle. But in spite of temporary victories, violence never brings permanent peace”(Martin Luther King Jr). Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet talk about two teens who love each other who can’t see one another because their families are in a huge feud so they need to find ways to see each other without getting caught. A lot of the times in the story the characters used violence to solve problems of their own. Violence is never the right answer, and it can’t solve problems.
In Romeo and Juliet, there were many incidents where a character tried to solve a problem with violence and more problems occurred. First of all, when Tybalt kills Mercutio the stage directions state, “Tybalt under Romeo’s arm thrusts Mercutio in, and flies with his followers.” Tybalt uses Violence to solve his problem of hating the …show more content…

If Tybalt would have solved the problem peacefully then he might not have died. Secondly, when Romeo is enraged because Tybalt kills Mercutio Romeo yells, “This shall determine that”(Shakespeare 3.4 134). After this Romeo ends up stabbing and killing Tybalt. Romeo tried to solve violence with more violence, and it didn’t end up working it just caused more problems because after this dreadful event Prince Escalus exiles Romeo from Verona. This is even worse, because in Verona is where Romeo’s love Juliet lives, and they won’t be able to see one another just from this bad action. Lastly, After Romeo kills Paris Romeo thinks, “O, give me thy hand one writ with me in

Open Document