Romeo and Juliet and Pyramus and Thisbe’s stories are extremely similar yet they obtain their fair share of differences. Throughout the stories they’re both battling separation from the one they truly love. These star crossed lovers jeopardize their lives for love. However, they both faced different obstacles, such as how they were separated from each other. Also they both had very distinct ways of speaking. Therefore, both of these stories are very comparable yet distinctive in their own way. Romeo and Juliet were tremendously in love with each other as were Pyramus and Thisbe. Both sets of lovers families did not grant approval of their relationship and forced separation upon them. Juliet said, “My only love sprung from my only hate! Too …show more content…
Romeo believed Juliet was dead and Pyramus believed Thisbe was dead. Because of this, Romeo and Pyramus took their lives so they could be with their one true love forever. Then, when Juliet and Thisbe realize that Romeo and Pyramus have deceased, they too committed the tragic act of suicide. If the two boys would’ve just waited a little to think about their decisions they would have realized their girlfriends were both alive. Maybe if Juliet and Thisbe had family to turn to they wouldn't have made such devastating …show more content…
Most of the characters in Romeo and Juliet spoke using very old English terms. Such as, “O, break, my heart! Poor bankrout, break at once! To prison, eyes; ne’er look on liberty! Vile earth, to earth resign; end motion here, And thou and Romeo press one heavy bier!”, (Shakespeare, 432). Pyramus and Thisbe on the other hand used more modern English. “The hateful wall that separated them had become their means of reaching each other.”, (Ovid, 488). Pyramus and Thisbe was easier to comprehend and relate to because they use many more terms that we are familiar with today while Romeo and Juliet's way of speaking was very contrasting compared to how we speak today. Most of the terms they used we've never heard of, let alone use in our everyday
Romeo and Juliet are madly in love with each other and will go to any lengths to be together.
Three strongly recognised language techniques are used to highlight romance between the two main characters in William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. The most overwhelming techniques comprised of the poetic text have long been acknowledged as metaphors, personification and symbols. These techniques focus on the devotion and love shared between the romantic ‘Star-crossed Lovers’ throughout the dramatic tragedy.
Baz Luhman and a More Accessible Romeo and Juliet to a Modern Teenage Audience Romeo and Juliet was written during the fifteenth century and the language and style is Elizabethan. Today the language is seen as incomprehensible to a young audience. This can cause many problems. because Shakespearean texts are compulsory for students to study during their education period. Usual responses to Romeo and Juliet are very negative as teenagers find the story inaccessible.
The Language of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. Gibson says that Shakespeare "brilliantly transformed whatever he worked on", through his use of language. Shakespeare was fascinated by language. Throughout the play Romeo and Juliet uses words and tools to do his work and conjure images of every different emotion.
In both of the stories, each of the characters fell in love with each other. Romeo fell in love with Juliet and Pyramus fell in love with Thisbe. This was one of the choices they decided to make, in Romeo and Juliet. They met at a dance and once they had figured out they were each other's enemies they decided to rush marriage, which in a fact is rushing love. “Juliet: If that thy bent of love be honorable, Thy purpose marriage, send me word tomorrow… (Shakespeare 407).” Romeo and Juliet are rushing into love, they are young and it is not destiny upon them it was a choice that could have been made. In Pyramus and Thisbe, their love was a main choice that they decided to make.”Growing up thus side by side they learned to love each other, they longed to marry, but their parents forbade”( Hamilton,488). The two lived next to each other and were forbidden to fall in love with
Shakespeare, William. Romeo and Juliet. Language of Literature. Ed. Arthur N. Applebee. Evanston: McDougal Littell, 2002. Print.
The. “Romeo and Juliet.” Literature and Language. Illinois: McDougal, Littell and Company, 1992. 722-842
Works Cited:.. Shakespeare, William. The. Romeo and Juliet. Eds. Maynard Mack and Robert Bayton.
Romeo and Juliet, written by William Shakespeare, is a tragic love story about two young lovers who are forced to be estranged as a result of their feuding families. The play is about their struggle to contravene fate and create a future together. As such, it was only a matter of time before Hollywood would try and emulate Shakespeare’s masterpiece. This had been done before in many films. Prominent among them were, Franco Zeffirelli’s 1968 “Romeo and Juliet” and Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 “William Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet.” Both films stay true to the themes of Shakespeare’s original play. However, the modernised Luhrmann film not only maintains the essence of Shakespeare’s writings, Luhrmann makes it relevant to a teenage audience. This is done through the renewal of props and costumes, the reconstruction of the prologue and the upgrading of the setting, whilst preserving the original Shakespearean language. Out of the two, it is Luhrmann who targets Romeo & Juliet to a younger audience to a much larger extent than Zeffirelli.
Both of them had unlike personalities and diverse attitudes toward life. Chiefly, the natures of these two men were undeniably different. For example, Romeo was fickle. At the beginning of the play, he had been depressed and in despair because his love - Rosaline was willing to be a celibate forever instead of accepting him. However, he had fallen in love with Juliet at the first sight and forgot about Rosaline immediately as he clarified, “ I have forgot that name, and that name’s woe.”
‘The difference between Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo & Juliet (1968) and Baz Luhrmann’s version of Romeo & Juliet (1996) is simply a modernisation created by Luhrmann to attract a teenage audience.’
Maddie Johnson Compare and contrast English 1 5/15/18 Today i will be talking about Romeo and Juliet and unrequited love and romantic love is the same but have differences. Some people know Romeo and Juliet as a tragic but love story. Let me just catch you on a couple of things. Romeo likes Rosaline but she doesnt share the same feeling for Romeo. Paris loves Juliet, thinks that he is going to marry her.
“Romeo and Juliet” is so much like “Pyramus and Thisbe” it is excruciatingly obvious. These timeless tales tell the story of true love, and also the loss of death. “Romeo and Juliet” can compare to “Pyramus and Thisbe” for three reasons; the lovers come from disagreeing families, the tales are both tragedy, and they are based on misconception and ill-timing. Although these stories are painful, they are also true to human nature, and that is why they are so similar.
Writing 4/14 The characters in Romeo and Juliet compare and contrast in many way. Even when they don’t conflict with one another, they always have some sort of relation. The similarities are more difficult to find than the dissimilarities .
Two of Shakespeare’s most famous works, Antony and Cleopatra and Romeo and Juliet, have much in common. Both center around the romantic relationship between two people who have many reasons why they shouldn’t be together. Romeo and Juliet is focused on the love of two children of feuding families, the Montagues and the Capulets. Similarly, Cleopatra is queen of Egypt and Antony is one of the triumvirs of the Roman Empire. Both are expected to handle their duties but disregard this in order to be together. Both couples meet an early demise due to their inability to live without the other. Both couples also have an underlying awareness that their relationship is doomed to fail. Antony and Cleopatra are somewhat more...