Roger And Me Analysis

785 Words2 Pages

Roger and Me
In the documentary film Roger and Me, writer/director Michael Moore takes us on a trip around Flint, Michigan, in the late 80’s, after the closing of most of the General Motors manufacturing plants in the area. The film spends a lot of time following Moore in his attempts to get a meeting with Roger Smith the then chairman of GM, as well as showing the plight of the city of Flint during and after the closings. We will identify some moral issues, real or perceived, that this film raises and look at them through a Utilitarian lens. Additionally, Moore uses this media to show the people of Flint being put out of their houses…he does not give any details of a direct correlation between the plant closings and the several evictions shown …show more content…

Smith is portrayed as an aloof man who has no desire to meet with the no-name Michael Moore. This is rather obviously unfair as it is unlikely anyone just showing up at the GM headquarters is going to get an audience. Moore never says that he attempted to get a meeting with Smith through proper channels and was ignored or told to go away. Moore’s actions on this particular point appear unprofessional and desperate, really only done to get people worked up about the corporate greed going on at GM. If somehow making Smith look bad would bring back jobs or stop the plant closing, a utilitarian would be all for it as the greater good would be severed with no layoffs. Unfortunately, utilitarianism doesn’t work here Moore might feel better about “punking” Smith this film did nothing to improve the situation in …show more content…

Moore, the people of Flint, and many others saw the plant closings and layoffs as a moral and ethical lapse in judgement by the chairman of GM, Smith. Smith had closed plants in Flint and opened others in Mexico, the film does not specify the timetable but implies that the closing and openings coincided. Smith is portrayed as an uncaring high powered executive who doesn’t care about the worker. Moore does not give enough details and facts to draw any type of serious conclusion about morality in his telling of the Flint plight. There is an aspect of Utilitarianism that would say Roger Smith was a great executive and person. It is difficult to find a true number of employees working for GM in the mid to late eighties; however, in 2015 GM has almost 250,000 employees. Without hard data it is possible to surmise that in the 80’s GM had a larger market share and therefore likely more people working for them. If it is true that GM had even more people working for them then, would the loss of 20,000 – 30,000 jobs to save the entire company be an excellent Utilitarian outcome. A Utilitarian could look at the choices and see that the only unhappy people are the people of Flint and the represent the minority in this situation. The rest of GM, some 200,000+ people are happy because they will still have jobs; in addition, the GM employees at the new

Open Document