Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lord of the flies analytical essay
Lord of the flies critical analysis
Lord of the flies critical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lord of the flies analytical essay
Freedom is a critical part of any society - without freedom citizens tend to become unhappy and no longer want to associate with their government. However the same goes for order; no order means anarchy and anarchy means that the people will want to disassociate with the community. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of boys crash land on an uninhabited island in the Pacific in the midst of war and must establish a functioning society based on what little they know about government from civilized life. A new society as had to be formed during the French Revolution, also by people with limited political experience. They based their new government off of Enlightenment ideas that would ensure them their natural rights: life, liberty, …show more content…
Maximilien Robespierre, the leader of the infamous French National Convention, believed that all inhabitants of a society should be free from monarchy, but his call for reform quickly became a reign of terror and 40,000 people were executed by the guillotine, a machine that chopped off people’s heads painlessly and instantaneously. There was very little order in Robespierre’s National Convention, and Robespierre was not a very strong government official, which meant that there was no one to keep people from wreaking havoc and any common sense that anyone had was lost amidst the chaos. This is also seen in Lord of the Flies when Jack and Ralph are arguing about which way of leadership is superior - Jack’s autocratic totalitarian way or Ralph’s direct democracy. The argument gets out of control and a giant boulder is released, hitting Piggy, one of the last boys remaining in Ralph’s group and causes the, “conch [to] explode into a thousand fragments and [cease] to exist [and] Piggy [...] [to travel] through the air [...] [fall] forty feet and [land] on his back” (181). Jack’s tribe varies so much from Ralph’s - Ralph being so focused on rescue and survival while Jack’s group of savages live a much more indulgent and free life. Their argument about Jack’s poor choices regarding his lack of order in the way that he leads causes the conch, a symbol of democracy and order, to be reduced to nothing more than “a thousand fragments”, representing the end of order and the prevalence of total freedom on the island. Jack’s overly free society clashing with Ralph’s orderly society also leads to the death of Piggy, the only reasonable child on the island, which shows that with the remarkable amount of freedom that Jack allows comes the loss of reason and the beginning of suffering. Robespierre and Jack are similar in that they both lead radical new civilizations and both allow for
The Lord of the Flies is a gruesome story about young boys stranded on an island, who underwent a transformation from polite British choir boys to savage hooligans. One of the main difficulties the boys face during their adventures upon the island, is their method of government, they either follow the path of Ralph, the democratic leader whose main focus is to escape the despairing island; or Jack a power-hungry monarchical leader who won't ever take no for an answer. The two boys are constantly bickering and arguing over who deserves the leader-position. We all understand Ralph wants to be leader so that he can ensure that the boys will return back home, but in Jack's case, it is a constant mystery to us about why he wants power over the other children. But we do get much small hints from the author, William Golding, that Jack's biggest fear among the other children on the island is public humiliation. This becomes more and more evident the farther on into the book, and his fear seems to be what persuades him to reach for a powerful position.
Maximilien Robespierre declared at the trial of King Louis XVI. “The King must die so that the nation can live.” Robespierre advocated the kings demise and with it the ways of the Ancien Régime. However, in an ironic twist of fate his words also foreshadowed his own rise and fall as the leader of the French Revolution. Known as “The Incorruptible”, or alternately “Dictateur Sanguinaire” Robespierre is a monumental figure of the French Revolution, but which was he? Was he the incorruptible revolutionist fighting to overthrow the Ancien Regime or a raging radical that implemented his own absolute tendencies under the cover of the revolution? When dissecting the dichotomy of Robespierre’s life and actions during the French Revolution and comparing it to the seven main characteristics of Absolutism it can be seen that Robespierre held many absolutist tendencies.
In Lord of the Flies, there is a theme that runs throughout the book that relates to a historical instance that changed society. Throughout the book there is a power struggle between Jack and his hunters and Ralph, the Littluns and Piggy. Jack represents a dictatorship and Ralph and the others want a democracy where everyone’s opinion and vote matters. This correlates with the civil war times, when the North wanted freedoms and equality for all people and the south wanted to dictate how others lived. Jack represents the oppressive southern states that wanted to rule over the black Americans. Ralph represents the northern states that wanted a democracy where everyone’s ideas mattered.
Initially popularized during the French Revolution, the term “terrorism,” at its inception, was a distinctly positive word; from the rubble of the first revolts in 1789, stemmed the regime de la terreur, an instrument of governance meant to further propel the success of the revolutionaries through the intimidation of those loyal to the dictatorial regime which governed France for much of the eighteenth century (Hoffman 3). Ironically, given the modern interpretation of terrorism, the revolutionaries who would ultimately constitute the regime de la terreur were advocating for virtue and democracy––in fact, one of the figureheads of the revolutionary movement Maximilien Robespierre was renowned for having said: “virtue, without which terror is
The French revolution was a significantly dangerous time period because of the chaos and conflict that took place in the streets France, resulting in the mass slaughter of thousands of innocent people. Within the revolution, there were many characters who took part in resolving the conflicts that had arisen. One thing that sparked the revolution was the shortage of food caused by a drought which lead to the bread prices going up since most were too poor to afford food at the new price people started revolting against their government in hopes to be heard and treated fairly while many were still dying of hunger. Within the revolution, there were figures such as George Danton, Jean Bailly and Reine Audu who contributed in the development and
Societies were constructed by both parties. With no authoritative figures to control what is decided, it enabled them to create whatever laws to their liking. The characters become more savage-like every day as the upkeep of their laws starts to become more lenient. As the intelligent Newt explained, “‘That’s one of the reasons we run this place all nice and busylike. You get lazy, you get sad. Start givin’ up. Plain and simple” (Dashner 77). Explaining that a societal type of order had to be established in order to keep their spirits up, the quote retaliates that believing what they have contributed to their small society will grant them into finding a way out soon. However, even this type or societal order came crashing down when... After Piggy was killed, tragically and the conch shattered, Jack had tried to kill Ralph. Consequently, after running away from Jack’s chaotic takeover, Ralph, “. . . argued unconvincingly that they would let him alone, perhaps even make an outlaw of him”, but then becoming aware (to his own knowledge) that, “These painted savages would go further and further” (Golding 184). Ralph realizes that Jack and the rest of the boys have become barbaric. Without the conch’s overwhelming reigns holding the boys back from becoming savage, all order is forgotten. With prior knowledge that the conch was what held the boys together, it can be seen that once it was destroyed, humanity was lost. Proving that once order is lost, humanity is then
When the King of England began to infringe on the colonists’ liberties, leaders inspired by the enlightenment grouped together to defend the rights of the American colonies. As Thomas Jefferson writes in the Declaration of Independence, “History of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these States” (Jefferson 778). The citizens of France, inspired by the enlightenment, desired a government run by the people. Marquis de Lafayette wrote, “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness” (de Lafayette 783).
Government is different within each country but it's main purposes are for rule and order. Government plays a vital role in Lord of the Flies and it enters into the moral story with the characters of Ralph and Piggy who represent order vs anarchy in the characters of Jack, Roger and the hunters. Using the conch, Ralph calls the young men to request, they build sanctuaries, they have a camp and the salvage fire which is manned by a gathering of young men who protect it. On the other hand, the twisted arm of Rogers almost strikes Henry who plays close to the seashore. “Ralph was vexed to find how little he t...
One of the main themes in William Golding's 1954 novel Lord of the Flies is that without civilization, there is no law and order. The expression of Golding's unorthodox and complex views are embodied in the many varied characters in the novel. One of Golding's unorthodox views is that only one aspect of the modern world keeps people from reverting back to savagery and that is society. Golding shows the extreme situations of what could possibly happen in a society composed of people taken from a structured society then put into a structureless society in the blink of an eye. First there is a need for order until the people on the island realize that there are no rules to dictate their lives and take Daveers into their own hands. Golding is also a master of contrasting characterization. This can be seen in the conflicts between the characters of Jack, the savage; Simon, the savior; and Piggy, the one with all the ideas.
In literature, as in life, people struggle with the principles and beliefs they hold. In the novel, Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, Ralph represents order, civilization, and leadership. On the island, Ralph is conflicted with his principles and beliefs that he has acquired over the years of living in a civilized and humane world and is caught between holding on to them or submitting to the barbarism that seems to have taken over the other boys.
At the beginning of Lord of the Flies, the boys create a democratic government. As the story progresses, the initial democracy on the island is ignored, and a dictatorship rises in its place. This dictatorship fails to keep the boys in order. The author, William Golding, shows that without the institution of a strong government and set of rules people will become impulsive and seek instant gratification. In the absence of order, people tend not to become disciplined of their own accord, but rather dissolve into destructive chaos.
While many may be outraged by Robespierre’s actions, he believed they were justified because the killed enemies of the Revolution by terror with the Republic in mind. In his mind the mass executions were justified, since he had the right reason for doing so and was trying to protect the republic. In this second source, we can see that Robespierre and others, will use any means necessary to protect their beliefs and eliminate any threats to those beliefs. Robespierre put the fear into people that they would be killed if they opposed the Revolution in anyway. One last act of terrorism that I looked at occurred in New York City, on September 11, 2011.
As the story opens, the boys are stranded on the island without any type of authority and must fend for themselves. A meeting is held and the chief, Ralph, is quickly named. A reader at once can notice there is already a power struggle between Jack and Ralph but this is overlooked when Jack says rational and sensible remarks about what should be done. The stability of civilization is still apparent when Jack says, “I agree with Ralph. We’ve got to have rules and obey them. After all, we’re not savages. We’re English, and the English are best at everything. So we’ve got to do the right things,” (Golding 42). The boys are still influenced by the restraints they learned from a controlled society. Joseph Conrad asserts that “there exists a certain ‘darkness of man’s heart’ that is suppressed by the light of civilization” (Introduction to Lord of the Flies 2). “Although Golding suggests the harmony of an ideal society, he does not indicate any faith in its creation” (Kennard 234). The more meetings that are held the more futile they become. “ ’We have lots of assemblies. Everybody enjoys speaking and being together. We decide things. But they don’t get done,’ ” (Golding 79). The boys realize that there are no punishments for what they do and disregard their priorities. “The idea that the absence of the restraints of civilization can lead to a subversion towards savagery” (Introduction to Lord of the Flies 2). The makeshift society that the boys have created is already starting to weaken.
...at having order or freedom alone brings along many conflicts and disagreements within society. Therefore it is believed that neither should be fully implied, hence in order to promote a healthy society, a basic equilibrium between the two should be present.