Robert Welch Case Analysis

1082 Words3 Pages

1. What values drive the author to his conclusions?

Throughout this book, author Robert Welch demonstrates values of compassion, caution, and knowledge. These values interweave in Welch’s explanations of how the healthcare system of this country has so much money invested in it, and yet, manage patients receive so little care. This country has a healthcare system that is currently operating out of a broken model that does not place value on individual health, but on profit incentive.
Values of caution and knowledge coincide in driving Welch to his conclusion of overdiagnosis due to society’s enthusiasm for everything medical. Welch concludes early on that the benefit of sticking to tried and true forms of healthcare overrides the belief that …show more content…

Welch’s instructions were to be followed, the state of medical care in the United States would reflect exactly what his titles states: less medicine, more health. Welch explains that currently, the central problem with the medical care system in this country is that too much money is being invested on health care that does not reimburse an equal measure of health. Medical care holds too little value, with too much money currently being invested in a healthcare system that over-diagnoses patients, and does not prioritize overall health and wellbeing. This needs to change. As Welch explains with the story of two CT scanners in the Boulder community—this was a situation that would allow for more CT scans to be performed, and more being money to be spent on these scans. This example demonstrates that if Dr. Welchs’ instructions of improving health and lessening the medicalization of health were followed, there would be a balance between wasteful and harmful …show more content…

As the author highlighted in this book, the quickest way to be diagnosed for prostate cancer is to be screened for it; the same notion applies for many other diseases and illness. With the advent of the technological age, doctors are now able to see more than they did before, and therefore, are more quick to diagnose illnesses and cancers early. As Welch explains, the problem with that is that not all illness or cancers will kill you; some cancers will stick around, but never cause any harm. So, this leads to screening for cancers that were never going to kill a patient, that end up being detected early on and dealt with, thus giving credit to early screening as a success story. As Welch explains, most illnesses and injuries that undertake a natural course of events, without medical intervention, usually heal on their own. This is problematic because it creates this idea that medical intervention is helpful and necessary, when that is not always the case. In general, as a society, the benefits of medical care have been over-exaggerated, while the harms of medical care have been largely ignored. If Welchs’ instructions were followed, a closer examination of the effect of screenings and tests would be the new medical

Open Document