Robert Merton Theory

1183 Words3 Pages

AN EXPLORATION INTO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRAIN THEORY AND ACADEMIC DISHONESTY I. Introduction Society is governed by a set of rules and norms that people follow. Every person has the choice to deviate from these norms, but almost everyone seems to have a subconscious desire to meet societal expectations. Any deviation away from these norms provokes an unwelcoming response from society. Success, wealth, power and other components of the “American Dream” are an aspiration for all in the United States; however our society does not provide the means for everyone to be able to achieve that goal. This means there are some people in society who are aiming for something that is unobtainable to them. Education in America is a pivotal factor …show more content…

The majority of society conforms to the methods accepted by society; however there are some that choose to follow unconventional means to reach their goals. Structures, such as the education system, are created by society to contribute and keep the society functioning properly; however society does not provide the means to everyone to accomplish the goals it sets out for them. Merton referred to this as anomie. Socially accepted goals place pressure on individuals to conform, forcing them to either work within the structures society, or engage in a deviant subculture in an order to achieve those goals. This imbalance is the basis of Merton’s strain …show more content…

The majority of people conform to the ideals of society, where the individual accepts the cultural goals of society and the accepted means of getting. What happens, though, when students aren’t able to accomplish the goals set out for them? There a four other modes of adaptation, or responses, that Merton identifies. A ritualistic student could continue going to class and studying, even though they know they have little chance of achieving academic success. Or the student could give up on their education and simply stop going to classes. This would be classified as retreatism. The student could also redefine the goals and means of college. This would be rebellion. The student could choose to accept one of these means of adaptation or they could hold onto visions of academic success by partaking in deviant actions such as cheating or plagiarizing papers that would allow them to achieve the cultural goals set by society. Merton would classify these students as innovators. This innovation has become a widespread epidemic in American higher education systems. Merton’s strain theory was advanced by Robert Agnew. Agnew believed that anomie is a macro-level concept, while strain is the micro-level concept. According to the Merton’s strain theory, an increase in aspirations and a decrease in expectations should lead to an increase in deviance, however, this was not found to be the case (Agnew, 1985). There are

Open Document