Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short summary of rip van winkle
Short summary of rip van winkle
Rip van winkle summary essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short summary of rip van winkle
After the American Revolution there were many of the American people who were lost as to whom they were now. There were two definite groups that had been created, those that were for the revolution and those that were against. At the same time, there were some that had just ridden along for the ride. When the revolution came to an end, there were people who were stuck in the middle confused as to who they were and what being an American specifically meant. Washington Irving shows this fear in his short story called “Rip Van Winkle”. In this short story, he brings to life the common fear and confusion that was among the people. Few were sure of who they were and who was considered their friends or their enemies. I want to show how George Irving used the fictitious character of Rip Van Winkle to show the different characteristics of the American people before and after the American Revolution.
Washington Irving first places Rip Van Winkle into a similar situation that American’s had just been facing. American’s were suffering brutal and terrible control from the United Kingdom. They wanted to escape the control and thus they broke away. Like the American’s, Rip Van Winkle was under suppressive control by Dame Van Winkle. Irving describes her by saying, “A termagant wife may, therefore, in some respects, be considered a tolerable blessing; and if so, Rip Van Winkle was thrice blessed” (Baym 955). All he sought to do was break away from her. This is when he decided to leave his town to go hunting so he could get a break from the retched women. Rip shows the commonalities in both parties departing away from something that was so familiar and comfortable to them. In Sarah Wyman’s article she discuss this event that Rip goes through...
... middle of paper ...
...lear precise view of how we began as a people and what we turned into. We are able to look more at the American people through the Rip Van Winkle character and understand more completely what the people of that time were going through.
Works Cited
1. Allen, Thomas B. “One Revolution Two Wars.” Military History. 27.5 (2011): 58-63. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 26. Oct. 2011.
2. Baym, Nina. The Norton Anthology of American Literature. B. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2007. 954-965. Print.
3. Beidler, Philip. “America’s Fairy Tale.” Fairy Tale Review. (2008): 19-30. Print.
4. Ferguson, Robert, A. “Rip Van Winkle and the Generational Divide in the American Culture.” Early American Literature. 40.3. (2005): 529-544. Print.
5. Wyman, Sarah. “Washington Irving’s Rip Van Winkle: A Dangerous Critique of a New Nation.” ANQ. 23.4 (2010): 216-222. Print.
In an English interpretation, one could see Rip Van Winkle as the mother country or England. Rip is “a kind neighbor, and an obedient hen-pecked husband .” (430) To an English citizen reading this story, it could easily represent the English monarchy. For years before the revolution, America had defied the King by refusing to pay taxes; support the militia that was protecting it from the French, Spanish, and Indians; and in many ways hindering progress in the colonies. England could easily have been seen as “hen-pecked” in the ways in which it handled the colonies. Many of the tax acts, such as the Stamp act, were ignored and monarchy was viewed as inept in dealing with the colonies. The Crown levied no penalties against the colonist when these acts were defied. The Crown just accepted not getting the money.
...n American Literature. By Henry Louis. Gates and Nellie Y. McKay. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2004. 387-452. Print.
Hughes initially dissects the myth into its national cause and effect, both good and bad. His emphasis on the crude and regrettable parts of our nation's history may lead readers to assume his discontent with our nation's history; though eventually his revealed views are more salutary and beneficial. I find Hughes' apparent apathy and objectivity on this subject to be most disturbing and even perplexing.
In “Rip Van Winkle” by Washington Irving he writes about a simple man, Rip Van Winkle, who does just enough to get by in life. He lives in a village by the catskill mountains, and is loved by everyone in the village. He is an easy going man, who spends most of his days at the village inn talking with his neighbors, fishing all day, and wandering the mountains with his dog to refuge from his wife the thorn on his side. On one of his trips to the mountains Rip Van Winkle stumbles upon a group of men who offer him a drink, and that drink changes everything for Van Winkle. He later wakes up, twenty years later, and returns to his village were he notices nothing is the same from when he left. He learns that King George III is no longer in charge,
Baym, Nina, and Robert S. Levine, eds. The Norton Anthology: American Literature. 8th ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2012. Print.
Perkins, Geroge, and Barbara Perkins. The American Tradition in Literature. 12th ed. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw Hill, 2009. Print
This is the issue that defines the importance of "Rip Van Winkle," and more particularly The Sketch Book, in the social development of our country. It seems that the particular social and political climate found its summation in our country's search for literary independence. Holistically it was Washington Irving's life, his struggles, his talents, and his perfectly-timed existence in the flow of history that helped to shape and solidify our country's identity, and immortalize him as an author.
In RIP Van Winkle, Dam Van Winkle is abusive, nagging, and sarcastic. In Rip Van Winkle, Washington Irving states that “but what courage can with stand the ever-during and all besetting terrors of a woman’s tongue.” He seems to imply that he did not like women who gave their opinions and spoke their mind. It seems that Rip is going into the woods to escape his wife.
In Rip Van Winkle, Irving shows his doubts in the American Identity and the American dream. After the Revolutionary war, America was trying to develop its own course. They were free to govern their own course of development; however, some of them had an air of uncertainties on their own identity in this new country. Irving was born among this generation in the newly created United States of America, and also felt uncertainty about the American identity. Irving might be the writer that is the least positive about being an American. The main reason for this uncertainty is the new born American has no history and tradition while the Europe has a great one accumulated for thousands of years. Therefore, in order to solve this problem, Irving borrows an old European tale to make it take place in America. This tale related to the Dutch colonists haunts the kaatskill mountains. In order to highlight the American identity, Irving praises the “majestic” mountains which Europe lacks. He describes the mountains that “their summits…will glow and light up like a crown of glory” Nevertheless, the use of these ancient explorers into Rip Van Winkle only to show that although American has formed its own identity, no one can cut its connection with Europe. No wonder when America was still under tyranny of the British rule, some people still cannot cut the blood relationship with Europe. Therefore, the American identity is blurred by their relationship with Europe since then.
Perkins George, Barbara. The American Tradition in Literature, 12th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2009. Print
“Rip Van Winkle” a story written by Washington Irving in the late eighteenth century is a classic example of an American myth. American myths have several distinct features. This includes being set in a past time period, being set in an isolated place and contains strange, exaggerated or even incredible characters. American myths also contain either a magical or heroic type of event. Irving’s story is set in the past in a remote location in the Catskill Mountains with strange and exaggerated characters and a magical event giving the reader feelings of both astonishment and believability.
The purpose of this essay is to examine how the two modernist writers depict America in the 1920’s in a state of moral decay and the pursuit for material wealth gradually replaces the purity of conventional moral ideals and beliefs in their ways by comparing and contrasting the two novels.
Baym, Nina et al. Ed. The Norton Anthology of American Literature. Shorter 8th ed. New York:
The characters of this story are believable and they are appropriate for the theme of the story. Dame Van Winkle is a character that is not liked throughout the story, whereas, Rip is a character that is liked by all. Therefore, it is evident that the protagonist of the short story is in fact, Rip Van Winkle. Rip shows he is a flat character during the story. "I have observed that he was a simple goodnatured man..." (Irving 155). This proves to the reader that Rip is always nice to everyone in the small village that he lives in. "Rip now resumed his old walks and habits..." (Irving 165). This says that even after being asleep for twenty years he can still come back and resume his life and be even happier than he was before. These quotes prove that Rip Van Winkle stays the same even after sleeping through the American Revolution. He continues to have a positive attitude even though his surroundings have changed. Apart from being a flat character, Rip Van Winkle is also a dynamic character. "Times grew worse and worse with Rip Van Winkle as years of matrimony rolled on; a t...
"henpecking" of his wife. Van Winkle found refuge and comfort going squirrel shooting with his dog. "Rip