Introduction How man was created has puzzled many, and been an argument in everyone’s life. I personally have reasons why I believe the way I do, but everyone has their own opinion depending on how or where they were raised, and what values they hold dear. Richard Dawkins has given a detailed analysis of why he believes the existence of God is highly doubtful, in his short story titled “The improbability of God.” After reading through his paper I will explain why I don’t believe in his allegations, and why I believe God is real, and my answers to his justifications.
My Life Experience’s God has been intertwined with my life since early childhood so I am very bias to him existing. My grandfather was Catholic, and my grandmother was a Jehovah’s
…show more content…
When I was roughly twenty-three years old, I was experiencing the toughest time my life has brought me. After getting in trouble with the law and then straightening my life, out everything started being on the up, to include newly being married, buying my first dream house, and my wife giving birth to a perfect beautiful baby girl. I then decided to join the military due to working multiple dead-end jobs because of a criminal background. With all these positive things happening in my life, I found out my wife had cheated on me, and cold heartedly told me she didn’t want anything to do with me. A family is all I ever wanted in my life, and this news devastated me to the point that I contemplated committing suicide. One night while laying with my wife in bed I decided to pray. I said to God “if you are real why are you allowing something like this to happen, and I want to see a sign to know that you are real.” “Show me something that isn’t a coincidence, I want Yarelis (my ex-wife) to slap me in my back right now, and I will know you are still with me.” Out of nowhere she slapped me in my back. I freaked out and asked her why she didn’t, and she had no explanation besides an urge came over her that she couldn’t fight. This immediately brought be to the poem “Footprints in the Sand.” Therefore personally, regardless what anyone can say, I believe in God, and I worship him in my own
There are different viewpoints on the question “what is the universe made of?” I think that both science and religion offer their own explanation to this topic and they sometimes overlap, which creates contradictions. Therefore, I do not agree with Stephen Jay Gould’s non-overlapping magisterial, which claims that there is a fine line separating science from religion. That being said, I think the conflict between science and religion is only in the study of evolution. It is possible for a scientist to be religious if he is not studying evolution, because science is very broad and it has various studies. In this essay, I will talk about the conflict between religion and science by comparing the arguments from Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Dawkins. I argue that science and religion do overlap but only in some area concerning evolution and the cosmic design. Furthermore, when these overlaps are present it means that there are conflicts and one must choose between science and religion.
The claims of rationality and the so-called scientific approach of the atheists and agnostics have been debunked. In the coming pages we shall see that both in the creation of the universe, in things created within the universe and in the creation of living beings, an intelligently designed process is going on, and we shall demonstrate that the objections of agnostics and skeptics to this assertion are merely delusions.
The Proof of the Existence of God There are many arguments that try to prove the existence of God. In this essay I will look at the ontological argument, the cosmological. argument, empirical arguments such as the avoidance of error and the argument from the design of the. There are many criticisms of each of these that would say the existence of God can’t be proven that are perhaps.
Is it valid to assume Dawkins position that humans are merely "robot vehicles"? This concept, alienating emotion, physical, and cultural growth from evolution, can be startling. By placing the importance of natural selec...
Stenger, Victor. J. 2007. God: The Failed Hypothesis—How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist. New York: Prometheus Books.
“Science proves religious people are stupid and atheists are smart.” This is a somewhat provocative title pulled from an article on a small blog called “The Moral Minefield,” run by a group of Graduate Theological Union students and graduates (Green). This statement is exactly the kind of thing, however, that one would expect Richard Dawkins to wholeheartedly agree with. In fact, he seems to imply this sentiment throughout the entirety of his speech titled, “Militant Atheism.”
I would shut my eyes because I knew what was coming. And before I shut my eyes, I held my breath, like a swimmer ready to dive into a deep ocean. I could never watch when his hands came toward me; I only patiently waited for the harsh sound of the strike. I would always remember his eyes right before I closed my own: pupils wide with rage, cold, and dark eyebrows clenched with hate. When it finally came, I never knew which fist hit me first, or which blow sent me to my knees because I could not bring myself to open my eyes. They were closed because I didn’t want to see what he had promised he would never do again. In the darkness of my mind, I could escape to a paradise where he would never reach me. I would find again the haven where I kept my hopes, dreams, and childhood memories. His words could not devour me there, and his violence could not poison my soul because I was in my own world, away from this reality. When it was all over, and the only thing left were bruises, tears, and bleeding flesh, I felt a relief run through my body. It was so predictable. For there was no more need to recede, only to recover. There was no more reason to be afraid; it was over. He would feel sorry for me, promise that it would never happen again, hold me, and say how much he loved me. This was the end of the pain, not the beginning, and I believed that everything would be all right.
Teenagers would be very intrigued by reading The God Delusion because it incites critical thinking in an articulate manner and captures the beauty of his arguments and the universe in a humorous style. The God Delusion lays out a scientific case on why there is most likely no God and why the world we be better off without religion. Richard Dawkins is able to articulate his arguments in a way that just flows off the page. He takes high level vocabulary and concepts and makes them easily comprehendible to the average reader. A prime example of this is when he explains evolution compared to creationism he uses the analogy of a sheer cliff face and creationism being equivalent to a person jumping from the bottom to the top in a single leap. Compared
For twelve years I’ve tried to hide my pain and fear from you. I’ve been trying to ignore the horror stories, unknowingly blinding myself from the stories of hope. I’m not as bitter as this story may lead you to think. In fact, I am an adamant believer in the statement (overheard three years ago in the Coffee House): “God has never taken anything away from me that he hasn’t replaced with something better.”
...h events on radically different timescales from those that characterize evolutionary change.” (Dawkins : 605) Even if Darwinism is a theory of slow cumulative processes, there are billions of fossils that date to millions of years ago. None of these include a structure with cumulative natural selection gradually happening to it in the process of evolving. According to Darwin, evolution and cumulative natural process is in a continual state of motion. If this is true, one might constantly wonder why we haven’t seen it or why fossil records aren’t found with examples of structures leading from the less evolved to more evolved. Therefore, until this day, we still wonder if Dawkin or Paley’s “design” theory is the proof for our existence. We may never know the truth, but at least we are exposed to these complex arguments of our existence that let us wonder continuously.
The information presented in evolution studies must be viewed with an open mind since there is no definite proof or law of evolution. The dilemma boils down to science vs. religion. God has been our creator since beginning of time, but the discoveries of recent science are sudde...
“The greatest mystery of existence is existence itself” (Chopra). Chopra, a world-renowned author, perceives the existence of life as a truly mystifying cerebration. The pending question that many scientist, and even theists, attempt to answer is how life ultimately began. Currently, the mystery is left with two propositions, evolution and creation. While both approaches attempt to answer the origins of life, evolution and creation are two contrasting concepts. Evolution views life to be a process by which organisms diversified from earlier forms whereas creation illustrates that life was created by a supernatural being. Creation and evolution both agree on the existence of microevolution and the resemblance of apes and humans but vary in terms of interpreting the origins of the life through a historical standpoint. A concept known as Faith Vs Fact comprehensively summarizes the tone of this debate, which leads the question of how life began.
In this essay I discuss why there is proof that there is a supernatural being known as God, who has created everything we know and experience. The mere claim, that there could be a "Proof for the Existence of God," seems to invite ridicule. But not always are those who laugh first and think later. Remember how all-knowing doctors/scientists laughed at every new discovery?
Once the crying commenced, my mother called me, telling me that my last grandma had gone into the hospital. She collapsed in her apartment and was rushed to the emergency center. I had no idea what to do. I felt like God was just condemning me and attacking me for some reason. I went into this deep depression and I didn’t want anyone to talk to me, if they did, I would simply start crying.
An atheistic evolutionist believes that theistic evolution is not true. The evolution theory made people believe that there is no God because the evolution theory does not agree to the rules of the bible. Atheistic evolutionist believes that people cannot believe in the evolution theory and the bible at the same time. The atheist Sir Julian Huxley said in 1959: “In the evolutionary pattern of thought