Rhetorical Analysis On The Mappist

1176 Words3 Pages

People are inevitably susceptible to emotional influence, and the passion of one person can inspire others. In The Mappist, Lopez narrates his curiosity for mapmaking, which prompts him to conduct independent literary research on the subject, and most notably, he expresses an admiration for Pena, a renowned mappist. Through his tone and syntax, Lopez conveys his passion for mapmaking and shares his enthusiasm for Pena to readers. Throughout the piece, Lopez tone reflects a strong reverence for Pena, demonstrating his interest in the subject. For example, he describes how Pena’s work highlights the “soul of Bogota” and is a “hard, translucent jewel of integration” (Lopez). He emphasizes how he admires Pena’s ability to encapture the beauty …show more content…

His disapproval and contempt towards the Trump administration is demonstrated through his sarcastic comment. It contrasts the lengthy, factual sentence preceding it, and as a result, its short length and straightforwardness gives the statement emphasis. The simplicity and absurdity of the statement was also likely intended to reference Trump’s line of logic. With the sarcasm obvious in his contemptuous tone, the statement references the agenda of the Trump administration and words it a simplistic way that mocks Trump’s logic to be immature and underdeveloped. Lapham also utilizes parallel structure when he describes Trump supporters, “...fellow citizens screamed, stamped, and voted in agreement”(Lapham). The parallel structure provides rhythm and allows the sentence to flow better, making the actions feel as if they are happening swiftly. This antagonizes Trump supporters by making the appear as if they are acting out impulsively without thinking and reveals how Lapham believes that they are acting blindly and methodically.
Through his tone, diction, and syntax, Lapham exemplifies a critical attitude towards the Trump administration. His brazen comments are evidence of America’s free society, in which despite holding a subversive viewpoint, Lapham cannot be silenced. His ability to actively express his views, regardless their alignment, emphasize how the freedom of the press is rightfully upheld. Ultimately, his fearlessness shown through his direct and critical writing inspires readers to challenge popular opinions and stay true to their

Open Document