Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rôle of humor
Rôle of humor
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comedy Central’s Drunk History abridged television series episodes, “Claudette Colvin and Rosa Parks” and “John Adams vs. Thomas Jefferson” feature an inebriated individual that tries to recount moments in history. The Onion’s video clip of “Breaking News: Bullshit Happening Somewhere” mimics a news report of a bear cub being spotted running through a neighborhood. The Drunk History video episodes’ purpose is to slightly inform and entertain viewers of historical moments through a different engaging perspective; the Onion’s video clip’s purpose is to taunt at news reports while retaining their basic sequence and structure. These three videos demonstrate the different use of rhetorical strategies to achieve their purpose while adopting humorous tones to appeal to their viewer demographic. The Drunk History episode “Claudette Colvin and Rosa Parks” explains how the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) initiates a bus boycott with Rosa Parks after being influenced by the actions and arrest of the young girl, Claudette Colvin. The decision to start the boycott with Rosa Parks demonstrates an ethos strategy as it is “composed of everything that makes an audience consider him or her persuasive” (Austin 664). The video briefly denotes a woman arguing that Colvin is too young, viewers …show more content…
Thomas Jefferson” is about the absurd fallacies and rivalry that initiated between Adams and Jefferson during their campaigns for the election of eighteen hundred. Although the two candidates made outstretched claims about one another, they hoped it would appeal to the logical reasoning of the voters. For example, Adams’s claim that Jefferson was dead is a false dilemma fallacy or “The rejection of one choice in such a situation [that] requires the adoption of the second alternative” (Austin 661). Adams hoped the voters would believe Jefferson was dead and therefore make them have “no other choice” than to vote for
Based on the following doctrines, I believe the extent of characterization of the two parties was not completely accurate during the presidencies of Madison and Jefferson, because of key pieces of evidence that proves inconsistencies during the period between 1801 and 1817. In the following essay, I will provide information supporting my thesis, which describes the changing feelings by each party and the reasoning behind such changes.
Jefferson had made promises to Americans, some of his promises in particularly the increase of land for the yeoman farmer and promised not kept were decreasing National debt and Federal power. Jefferson’s presidency was to a certain extent a “Republican Revolution” but at the same time it had also become a continuation of Federalists policies. While making decisions for the best interests of Democratic Republicans, Jefferson had chosen the same path of the Federalist in order to keep his promises, and had to sacrifice some of the ideals and promises of the “Republican Revolution.”
In particular, of these men, Thomas Jefferson especially is exposed, and his relationship with Adams is explored, as it is a crucial fluctuating one. Though born opposites, they forge a relationship as diplomats, and as close friends, only after meeting and working together, however. In a letter to James Madison, before Jefferson first went to France to work with Adams, he likens him to a poisonous weed. After becoming great friends in Paris, however he writes back to Madison, “He is so amiable that I pronounce you will love him if ever you become acquainted with him”. Later on though, as the advent of political parties comes into being, and during the intense struggle for the presidency of the election of 1800, the two become archrivals. Incredibly, after this, they become close friends once again, and amazingly die on the same day.
These stories are perfect bait for the Comedy Central show, Drunk History, in which the director gets intoxicated with a friend or comedian and then the latter person gives a sloshed retelling of an interesting story from our history. The audio from the drunken telling is recorded and played over a slew of notable actors whom reenact the story with full sets, costume, and production. In one episode; they present the story of Theodore Roosevelt, the formation of his Rough Riders, and their battles during the Cuban War of Independence. While the delivery is not historically precise it does effectively give their viewers an entertaining approximation of what occurred. This may leave viewers confused about the facts of the past, but it also has the probability to entice people into perusing more history and learning more about our past.
Jefferson’s use of strategies and language is ineffective in making his points and persuading readers of his arguments. Using hasty generalization, begging the question, and insulting language in his analysis is a huge flaw which lessens the credibility of his argument and offenses his readers. Jefferson should use other argumentative strategies and prevent himself from using insulting language in order to convince readers of his arguments.
We have all wanted to get revenge on someone. Revenge is a very common feeling. It originates with hate or jealousy. Revenge can make our lives miserable and make us do things that hurt other people. We shouldn’t try to get revenge on anyone. If someone did something bad to us, we should think more deeply about that situation before taking any action that could cause some legal problems. Some people can get the point of killing just to get their revenge and some people leave this decision due to some circumstances, just like in the story we just read, “He Becomes Deeply and Famously Drunk” by Brady Udall. This story deals with the concept of revenge. Archie, is a handsome, loud and blunt seventeen-year-old who has spent much of his recent life
On the date May 26, 1956, two female students from Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Wilhelmina Jakes and Carrie Patterson, had taken a seat down in the whites only section of a segregated bus in the city of Tallahassee, Florida. When these women refused to move to the colored section at the very back of the bus, the driver had decided to pull over into a service station and call the police on them. Tallahassee police arrested them and charged them with the accusation of them placing themselves in a position to incite a riot. In the days after that immediately followed these arrests, students at the Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University organized a huge campus-wide boycott of all of the city buses. Their inspiring stand against segregation set an example and an intriguing idea that had spread to tons of Tallahassee citizens who were thinking the same things and brought a change of these segregating ways into action. Soon, news of the this boycott spread throughout the whole entire community rapidly. Reverend C.K. Steele composed the formation of an organization known as the Inter-Civic Council (ICC) to manage the logic and other events happening behind the boycott. C.K. Steele and the other leaders created the ICC because of the unfounded negative publicity surrounding the National Associat...
Wilson, D. L. (1992). Thomas Jefferson and the Character Issue. The Atlantic Monthly , 270 (5), 57-74.
Claudette Colvin attended Booker T. Washington High School, where she was very studious. Claudette's family did not have enough money to afford a car, so she relied on the city's gold-and-green buses. On March 2, 1955 when Colvin was about 15 years of age, she was arrested for violation the local law. She refused to give up her seat to a group of white men that boarded the bus shortly after. She was on a bus called the Capital Heights, which was the same bus and the same year that Rosa Parks committed the same "crime" as Claudette only 9 months later. On this day, four white men got on the bus, and Claudette was sitting somewhere near the emergency exit. She was looking out the window when the white men stopped at her seat and said nothing. The bus driver ordered her to give up her seat to one of the men, and she ignored the order. She has given her seat up to white people before, but this is the day she was fed up with it. Claudette heard what the bus driver was saying, but she decided that day she was not giving up her seat to a white man just becau...
On December 1, 1955, Parks was taking the bus home from work. Before she reached her destination, she silently set off a revolution when she refused to give up her bus seat to a white man. As a black violating the laws of racial segregation, she was arrested. Her arrest inspired blacks in the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) to organize a bus boycott to protest the discrimination they had endured for decades. After filing her notice of appeal, a panel of judges in the District Court ruled that racial segregation of public buses was unconstitutional. It was through her silent act of defiance that people began to protest racial discrimination, and where she earned the name “Mother of the Civil Rights Movement” (Bredhoff et
This paper is organized to support the argument he makes in the introductory paragraph, starting with insurrection and its causes, after which he destabilizes rebuttals against his statements. Jefferson debunks the
However, the author 's interpretations of Jefferson 's decisions and their connection to modern politics are intriguing, to say the least. In 1774, Jefferson penned A Summary View of the Rights of British America and, later, in 1775, drafted the Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms (Ellis 32-44). According to Ellis, the documents act as proof that Jefferson was insensitive to the constitutional complexities a Revolution held as his interpretation of otherwise important matters revolved around his “pattern of juvenile romanticism” (38). Evidently, the American colonies’ desire for independence from the mother country was a momentous decision that affected all thirteen colonies. However, in Ellis’ arguments, Thomas Jefferson’s writing at the time showed either his failure to acknowledge the severity of the situation or his disregard of the same. Accordingly, as written in the American Sphinx, Jefferson’s mannerisms in the first Continental Congress and Virginia evokes the picture of an adolescent instead of the thirty-year-old man he was at the time (Ellis 38). It is no wonder Ellis observes Thomas Jefferson as a founding father who was not only “wildly idealistic” but also possessed “extraordinary naivete” while advocating the notions of a Jeffersonian utopia that unrestrained
During the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson succeeded in defeating the incumbent, John Adams, and assumed the presidency. In terms of elections though, the election of 1800 itself was a fascinating election in that it a heavily-contested election and was effectively the first time political parties ran smear campaigns against each other during an election. The Republican Party attacked the Federalists for being anti-liberty and monarchist and tried to persuade the public that the Federalists were abusing their power through acts such as the Alien & Sedition Acts and the suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion (Tindall and Shi 315). The Federalists, on the other hand, attacked Jefferson for his atheism and support of the French Revolution and warned that his election would result in chaos (316). By the end of the presidential election, neither Adams nor Jefferson emerged with his reputation completely intact. Still, rather than an election between Adams and Jefferson, the election of 1800 ultimately boiled down to a deadlock between Jefferson and his vice presidential candidate, Aaron Burr, who each held seventy-three electoral votes, resulting in the election was sent to the House of Representatives. In the end, the deadlock was resolved only by Alexander Hamilton, whose immense hate for Burr allowed Jefferson to claim the presidency. However, the election of 1800 was more than just a simple presidential election. The election of 1800 was the first peaceful transfer of power from the incumbent party to the opposition and represented a new step in politics, as well as a new direction in foreign policy that would emerge from Jefferson’s policies, and to this extent, the election of 1800 was a revolution.
compromise. Jefferson’s account suggests the growing divide, showing that without a mediator, the ideologies are too far divided to achieve legisla...
In the centre of ground theory stands to build theory from data and to form and describe concepts which build the blocks of the given theory (Corbin, & Strauss, 2008). Process of analysis in case of grounded theory is casual, flexible and determined by the insight obtained from the data (Corbin & Staruss, 2008). This approach is positivist and the open coding allows to identify the most important variables (Corbin & Staruss, 1998). The interview and its grounded theory analysis reports regarding the conceptions of how distance learning is managed. It aims to illustrate in-depth explanations through cycling, reoccurring thoughts and which allow to generate theory against them. As per Threlkeld, Brezoska notes (1994) for successful distance learning,