Rhetorical Analysis Of 'The Ballot Or The Bullet'

849 Words2 Pages

Seven years prior to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Martin Luther King Jr. gave a famous speech on May 17, named “The Ballot or the Bullet” on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in front of 20,000 people. The speech addressed voting rights for African Americans across the country since so many were denied the American privilege. He argues that there needs to be better leadership in places of need to resolve the issues of racial injustice. King appeals to logic in order to emphasize the lack of robust leadership in places of need such as the government, the Northern White Liberals, and the Black Community. When speaking of the government, King’s diction exposes the inadequacy of the executive and legislative branches. He mentions that the judicial branch of government is the only branch that is taking part in positive leadership for racial equality. The executive branch of the government however, “is all too silent and apathetic.” These use of words invokes a sense of insouciance, or a disinterest in the face of an all too pressing issue. …show more content…

He says “It is a liberalism so bent on seeing all sides, that it fails to become committed to either side. It is a liberalism that is so objectively analytical that it is not subjectively committed. It is a liberalism which is neither hot nor cold, but lukewarm.” King’s repetition of the phrase “It is a liberalism...” is used to identify the liberals poor job on pushing for racial justice. When King says “ ... so bent on seeing all sides, that it fails to become committed to either side... so objectively analytical that it is not subjectively committed...” He indicates that even as they scrutinize the issue, the northern white liberals are being neutral and failing to accomplish the political doctrine on the rights and freedoms of people, hence not fulfilling the title as true

Open Document