Rhetorical Analysis Of Operation Desert Storm By George Bush

722 Words2 Pages

In the world of politics, the relationship between the leader and the people is often hard to tell, especially in times of war. Citizens will start to form opinions on what actions taken and the results of those actions taken on by the leader. I will be analyzing George Bush’s speech about the successful of Operation Desert Storm and the Saddam Hussein’s speech to the Iraqis prior to the invasion of Kuwait. Both Bush and Saddam used certain rhetorical strategies in their speech in order to accomplish on what they have to say. I will be going over some the strategies used by George Bush and Saddam Hussein during their speech. I will start with George Bush’s speech at Maxwell Air Force Base. Bush starts by thanking the men and women who participated …show more content…

Saddam starts his speech with “O faithful, honest Muslims, wherever you may be; O people wherever faith in God has found its way to your hearts, and wherever it found what embodies it in the sincerity of your intentions and deeds”. Saddam sounds like he is reciting a passage from the Quran. Saddam is telling his people that he is taking actions for the good of Iraq. Saddam continued with his speech and talks about the United States and Zionism. “…some Arabs and to many foreigners so that some of them could not remember what Zionism and U.S. imperialism have done against Iraq, beginning with the Irangate plot or the Iran-Contra scandal in 1986 until the first months of 1990, when the plot against Iraq reached its dangerous phases…” Saddam states that Israel and the United States have already cause damage to the Iraqi people. Saddam also criticizes the United States for being greedy and bullying Iraq. “They want to deprive Iraq of every quality characterizing truly faithful people and good sons who are faithful to their people, homeland, and nation. Shame on them and shame on their cowardly act, and all they do.” Coming to the end of the speech, Saddam reiterates what he said in the beginning of the speech again. “O fair people, note all this, as the Iraqis have noted, acknowledged, and concluded.” Saddam closes his speech by calling to God again and states, “Dignity, glory, and victory for the heroes of this path, the sons of our nation and mankind. God is great, God is great; accursed be the

Show More
Related

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of George W. Bush Columbia Speech

    206 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the “George Bush’ Columbia” speech, George W. Bush used a variety of ways in order to make his mark and effectively assemble his dialog. One of the most prominent strategies Mr. Bush used was his sentence structure. He did a great job shaping his speech by initially addressing the problem at hand. He first stated what happened, who it happened to, and gave his condolences to the ones who didn’t make it, along with their families. Mr. Bush also seemed sincere throughout his speech as he made sure to mention each hero apart of the crew. Another technique George W. Bush displayed was the diction and tone he used while delivering the speech. From listening to the audio last week, I remember the passion behind Bush’s words and the sincerity

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Lieutenant Colonel Harold In The Film We Were Soldiers

    66 Words  | 1 Pages

    The speech that I have chosen is of Lieutenant Colonel Harold in the 2002 movie We Were Soldiers. The speech occurs in the beginning of the movie prior to the soldiers heading into war in Vietnam. I chose to deliver this speech because its message is very powerfully and meaningful. Due to it encouraging soldiers to look beyond their identity and unit to accomplish a

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis of President Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech

    832 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis of President Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech. The Pearl Harbor address to the nation is probably one of the most famous speeches made throughout history. In this essay, I will evaluate the rhetorical effectiveness of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's famous speech and show that his speech is a successful argument for the United States of America. I will focus on the speaker's credibility, all the different appeals made throughout the speech, as well as the purpose and the audience of the speech.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis of President Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech

    1255 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Yesterday, December 7th, 1941- a date which will live in infamy- the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan” (1). These are the words Franklin Delano Roosevelt chose to begin his Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation the day after Pearl Harbor was attacked by Japan. FDR’s speech was a call to arms, and in his speech he expressed outrage towards Japan and confidence in inevitable triumph. The speech was a request to declare war against Japan and to bring the United States into World War II. FDR’s speech was successful in bringing the United States into World War II because FDR presented facts explaining why war needed to be declared and used righteous indignation to give the nation a sense of pride and hope by letting them know everything would be done to ensure the nation’s safety.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Rush To War

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    After an analysis of the preliminary speeches Former Senator Robert C. Byrd gave in the early 2000s one may deduce that the senator had the welfare of his fellow Americans in mind as the copious amounts of people around the world might be effected by this war. These speeches are in regard to the grand dilemma that presented itself over a decade ago. This conflict happened to be whether or not we ought to go to war with Iraq. The vein of the initial speech, Rush to War Ignores U.S. Constitution, is cautionary. Byrd is attempting to emblematically pump the breaks on the notion that we have a duty to wage war. In the second speech A Preordained Course of Action on Iraq, Byrd continues to convey his disapprobation as well as recurrently referencing

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Pearl Harbor Address To The Nation

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    The “Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation” by FDR, also known as the infamy speech, is as good a speech as any. He attempts to rally the legislative branch to say that the United States should go to war with Japan, since they had attacked the U.S. without warning and with no provocation at Pearl Harbor. His speech was astoundingly successful, winning over all of the senate and all but one in the house of representatives. He made several good points, backing them up with known facts, which he laid out in a way that made sense logically and sparked emotion out of the audience.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis of President’s Address To The Nation Post 9/11

    1656 Words  | 4 Pages

    The “President’s address to the Nation” is a claim of policy. President Bush is asking people to support his policy that “we” have to keep fighting the war “until either we or the extremists emerge victorious.” To hold up his claim of such a policy, he uses three supports during the speech.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of George Bush 9/11 Speech

    1047 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of 9/11

    749 Words  | 2 Pages

    The day was September 11th, 2001, a moment in history that will never be forgotten by any American living at the time. It was in the early morning hours on this day that our nation experienced the single most devastating terrorist attack ever carried out on American soil. Images of planes crashing into the World Trade Center, news coverage of buildings on fire, and images of building rubble will forever be imprinted into the history of this great nation. However, it was on one of the darkest days for America that one of the most impassioned speeches ever given by a United States president was spoken. President George W. Bush’s speech addressing the nation after the “9/11” attacks was infused with pathos through his imagery of destruction and

    Read More

  • Bush and Blair 9-11 Speeches: Analysis of Rhetorical Devices

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the speech, the Former President George W Bush strives to empower Americans by instructing them to remain resolute, but to “go back to [their] lives and routines”. He uses the personal pronoun we and the common pronoun us repeatedly to indicate that the people of the United States, who either saw the event on television or experienced this event firsthand, were and still are involved in this national tragedy. He implements this emotional appeal into his speech to involve all Americans--people living in the United States of America, regardless of their ethnicity, race, or culture, and to acknowledge that the American people have endured this together, and that they will continue to advance after this event with stronger resolve, stronger than ever. In addition, he implements personification to motivate and empower the American people. “Our nation, this generation, will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future” (Bush, 2001). “This generation”, again a synonym for the American people, with its unwavering resolve, will fight for its freedom persistently. He intimates that the future of America and of democratic freedom is in the hands of the American people: that the American people have the power to control their fate. The next sentence leads into America’s “philanthropically” democratic nature: “We will rally the world to this cause, by our efforts and by our courage” (Bush, 2001). This statement has been followed up by action only a few years later, when the United States intervened in the Iraqi War, Libyan Revolution, and even more civil wars to ensure the freedom of citizens from dictatorships, which in Islāmic nations, were militant groups, like the Hamas and Taliban. Lastly, the president utilized anaphora, specifically a tripartite structure, by affirming that the American people “will not tire”, “will not falter”, and “will not fail”. He implies that the American people will relentlessly fight for the worldwide establishment of peace and democratic institutions, a promise which America has kept even in the face of its own national crisis.

    Read More

  • The United States 's Operation Desert Shield

    1183 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States launched an operation known as Operation Desert Shield, also known as the Persian Gulf War, in August of 1990 in response to Saddam Hussein’s order to the Iraqi forces to take over Kuwait. President George Herbert Walker Bush made the decision to send American troops to Saudi Arabia to form an international coalition that would eventually turn into an operation known as Operation Desert Storm. The United States Army had not witnessed an event of such international and Homefront importation since the Cold War.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: We Will Degrade And Ultimately Destroy ISIL By Barack Obama

    1022 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Barack Obama delivered an address to the nation on the U.S. Counterterrorism strategy to combat ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) on September 10, 2014. The recent issue, which became the basis for this speech, has been President Obama’s response to Syria’s Bashar al-Assad’s use of chemical weapons against diverse civilians. He delivered this speech to prove to the nation that he has an elaborate strategy along with several tactics to destroy the terrorist group. Obama described the ISIL in his speech by stating, “in a region that has known so much bloodshed, these terrorists are unique in their brutality.  They execute captured prisoners.  They kill children.  They enslave, rape, and force women into marriage.  They threatened a religious minority with genocide.  And in acts of barbarism, they

    Read More

  • The Role of John F. Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis

    1743 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Cuban Missile Crisis Speech by John F. Kennedy, broadcasted on 22 October, 1962: available on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOnY6b-qy_8

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis of FDR's Pearl Harbor Address

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    President Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed the nation at 12:30pm on December 8th, 1941, a day after the Pearl Harbor attacks, with his self-written speech informing the nation and urging Congress to formally declare war on Japan (Rosenberg). His speech ‘Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation’, more commonly known as the ‘Day of Infamy’ speech, is considered one of the most famous and well-crafted American Political speeches of the 20th century.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of President Barack Obama's Speech To The Nation On Syria

    1087 Words  | 3 Pages

    The night before the anniversary of 9/11 in 2013, Barack Obama delivered a speech to the United States of America on the subject of Syria’s inhumane use of chemical weapons on its own citizens. The United States’ intelligence analysts estimated that more than 1,400 civilians were killed due to the chemical warheads that were launched on the area right outside of Damascus. In President Barack Obama’s address to the nation on Syria, he attempts to persuade the American people to support his plan of a targeted air strike on Syria. By describing the victims of Syria, giving reasons for the inhumanity of the Syrian government, and reinforcing his credibility,

    Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Operation Desert Storm By George Bush

Open Document