Rhetorical Analysis Of Let There Be Dark

517 Words2 Pages

If Edison didn’t create the bulb, what would we being doing? We would be appreciating darkness and know the world with little light.Paul Bogard persuades his audience in “ Let There Be Dark” that natural light should be preserved with evidence, reasoning, and persuasive elements. To begin with, the evindence Paul Bogard used in his article to explain darkness value. The evidence shows how too much light leads to sleep disorders, diseases, and depression. In “ Let There Be Dark” paragraph 3, sentence 1 he writes “ the American Medical Association has voiced its unanimous support for ‘ light pollution reductions efforts and glare reductions efforts at both national and states levels.” He use this to tell us that this is a problem and some people are beginning to address it. He also says inside of “ Let There Be Dark” paragraph 3, sentence 2 “ our bodies need darkness to produce the hormone melatonin , which keeps certain cancers from developing, and our bodies need darkness for sleep”. He explains how we can prevent certain diseases and how we need sleep and darkness to survie. …show more content…

His reasoning was wasting money, wrecking habitats, and depending on it too much. In“ Let There Be Dark” paragraph 2, sentence 2 “ Today, though, when we fell the closeness of nightfall, we reached quickly for a light switch.” he explains how too depended we are on lights because we turn them before darkness is there. Also in “ Let There Be Dark” paragraph 4, sentence 3 “ Ecological light pollution is like the bulldozer of the night, wrecking habitat and disrupting ecosystems several billions years in the making. Simply put, without darkness, earth’s ecology would collapse…” He says we are messing up the ecosystem for the nocturnal and crepuscular species and that we are messing up

Open Document