Rhetorical Analysis Of Kim Kardashian Broke T-Mobile

680 Words2 Pages

Kim Kardashian Broke T-Mobile
Out of the many commercials that are out in television, one that stood out to me was the Kim Kardashian T-Mobile’s Data Stash commercial. At first sight, viewers may see it as a joke, although it does have important information being featured. They use Kim Kardashian because she is famous and the year it was aired, her popularity was very high. The commercial seems very stupid, but it still presents rhetorical devices. As Parker and Chavez said, “It was one of the most anticipated Super Bowl ads of 2015. But the reaction was far from winning” (para. 1).
In this commercial we have ethos, logos, and pathos present. First of all, ethos are established because Kim Kardashian comes out. She is a rising artist and a …show more content…

I think the commercial is funny and the deal is actually a pretty good one. Although, a lot of people seemed to disagree because they thought it was a waste of commercial. I think that the program they were offering was a good deal, but maybe the way that they made Kim Kardashian present it, was not the best. Maybe it would have had more effect if she featured moments that really matter, in order to reach the people with pathos. If they might have used another person maybe the way data stash was presented would have been more convincing. I think it kind of helped that they aired it in the Super bowl, since viewers enjoy the new commercials that air, and they might have found this one funny. I do not think that T-Mobile did a good job at persuading people to get the feature Data Stash. It is kind of a joke that they used her because Time Magazine says that a previous T-Mobile commercial “was a text-only affair that offered to pay off users' contracts with rival carriers and that ended with the promise: "Maybe next year we'll do an ad with overpaid movie stars” (Vincent, para. 2). Their commercial would have been better off without Kim Kardashian in it because Kim is not an actor and therefore, she is not good at selling the product. As said by Vincent “she's probably the most prolific internet celeb there is” (para.

Open Document