Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial inequality
Racial inequality in America
Racial inequality and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This rhetorical analysis of Jesse Williams’ acceptance speech for the humanitarian Award. The Rhetors for this speech would be Jesse Williams himself and also BET (Black Entertainment Television). This analysis focused more on the verbal symbols then the non verbal because it was such a important subject that had, and still is going on in American. Jesse Williams’ acceptance speech had focused on informing the world that something has to be done about the injustice in our police system, and also the wrongful doing against African Americans. This speech was given June 26th 2016 at the Microsoft Theater. Around this time mapping police violence shows that 36% of blacks were killed by police even though only 16% of African American take up the …show more content…
WIlliams uses “Now” in the first four stanzas. He does this to show how prominent and serious this situation is. The target audience can’t just sit there and just watch, they have to do. Mr. Williams also states “ All of us in here getting money? That alone isn't gonna stop this.” This speech being at the BET awards insinuates that majority of the audience are african american, so he’s stating that just because we are doing well for ourselves and are successful people of color doesn't mean they can forget about their people. This brining into another pattern of the word “we”. Constantly through the speech Jesse Williams includes himself as one with the word “we”. Jesse is a celebrity himself and the victims of police brutality are not. But includes himself with we because he understands in this world he still a “ni***r” to the police who are actively killing unarmed black men. He shows that hegemonic practice is blacks being profiled by police race but also they try to legitimize it by which he says himself “burying black people out of sight and out of mind while extracting our culture, our dollars, our entertainment”. By him saying this he proves they’re using african american culture to justify that they’re not racist, or targeting only blacks. While analyzing this speech Jesse isn’t trying to degrade the white race, but he wants to let it be know that what is happening to his people is wrong. He exposes that hegemonic thinking that has been …show more content…
When he first started the speech he made sure to include black women which are often looked past more than a black man. He builds that relationship with the black women to show them that they are not forgotten he states “We can, and will, do better for you.” This was such a great strategy to engage the crowd to feel and respond to his speech. Also he makes sure to humble himself by saying the speech was not made for him it was made for “real organizers all over the country, activist… the struggling parents, the teachers….. A system built to divide and impoverished and destroy us cannot stand if we do.” He shows these are only some of the people who don’t get enough credit and today they will. Jesse uses such a progressive strategy when giving this speech because he uses every way possible to knock down the “hegemonic masculinity” which would be the white
In December 2009, the world was shocked by Tiger Woods. News was released to the public of a scandal regarding Woods cheating on his wife with numerous women. As a well-known and respectful individual in the golfing world, it was important for him to take responsibility for his actions. More importantly, in order for Woods to keep his sponsors and save his reputation, he needed to apologize to his sponsors and family. His apologetic speech exemplifies his remorseful attitude through diction, or word choice, and the use of ethos, or credibility, and pathos, an emotional appeal, to the audience.
In today’s society, one of the most natural human traits is selfishness. David Foster Wallace incorporated this idea in his commencement speech at Kenyon College in 2005. Wallace aims to persuade his audience that, “the most obvious, ubiquitous, important realities are often the ones that are the hardest to see and talk about.” Although the intended audience of his speech is the graduates and staff, along with their friends and family, the piece has become quite popular since its delivery. Wallace offers, “nothing less than the truth” and captivates the listeners with his complete honestly. His personal tone lets the audience feel like they are a part of the conversation, rather than just receiving it. Wallace successfully conveys his message that society is blind to the world around them through the use of logic, humility and emotional appeals.
My response to this play I will detail in five sections. This play was written by Tennesssee Williams and premiered in the mid 50s. This play is a southern drama with subjects involving death, mendacity, alcoholism and family disagreement.
President Obama’s Address to the nation was presented on January 5, 2016. His speech was shown on all of the major network stations. The main goal of his speech was to get the point across to the nation about the increasing problem of gun use. His speech really focused on the issue of gun control and if it would benefit the country. Overall, the biggest idea of his Address was that gun control is a large issue in the United States. The way to prevent deaths caused by firearms can be prevented in other ways than taking peoples guns away. The examples brought up in this Address really stood out to me. The use of personal, national, and global examples really made his speech stronger on the topic of effectiveness.
For instance, he says ‘it’s time for us to submerge our difference and realize that it’s best for us to first see that we have the same problem, a common problem(Quote). This is an effective way to catch the audience's attention and make them feel like they’re all included because even though many can come from different places they can all make a difference together to end racial inequality. Moreover, since the speech was given during an election year he highlights how whatever the black community decides to vote it will be influential and they have power to slowly make a change. Since a lot of the politicians during this year would come into their neighborhoods and tell them who they should vote for this the year that it needs to change since they are always promising false promises. One of the powerful statements that was given in this speech was that emphasized that the Black community should vote occured when he said “A ballot is like
Faulkner opens his acceptance speech by establishing himself as a humble and modest person, acknowledging that the Nobel Prize, “was not made to me as a man, but to my work.”(line 1) He appeals to the audience by dedicating his speech to the young men and women of the time. Faulkner proceeds by questioning people’s willingness to write with raw emotion, declaring that the tension caused by the Red Fear and Cold War does not nullify a writer’s ability to use the old verities and truths of the heart in their writing. Using his own work as an example, Faulkner argues that in order for a piece of literature to be valuable it must illuminate the universal truths, and embrace the verities of love, honor, pity, pride, compassion, and sacrifice. Expanding
President Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Rhetorical Analysis. Barrack Obama’s inauguration speech successfully accomplished his goal by using rhetoric to ensure our nation that we will be in safe hands. The speech is similar to ideas obtained from the founding documents and Martin Luther King’s speech to establish ‘our’ goal to get together and take some action on the problems our country is now facing. As President Barack Obama starts his speech, he keeps himself from using ‘me’, ‘myself’, and ‘I’ and replacing it with ‘we’, ‘us’, and ‘together’ to achieve his ethos.
Police brutality has been an apparent mark on the struggles, trials, and tribulations of people of minorities for years, primarily Black people. From the times of slavery to the present unlawful targeting and murders of black citizens with no justification, police brutality has been an enema in Black American culture for hundreds of years. Seen both in James Baldwin’s “Going to Meet the Man” and in the current happenings of the United States. The hashtag “#BlackLivesMatter” has been a focal point in the current struggle for equality of the races. The current outpouring of support for black lives and
Many would argue that President Obama is one of the most effective speakers in the decade. With his amazing speeches, he captivates his audience with his emotion and official tone.
In America, police brutality affects and victimizes people of color mentally and socially. Social injustice has become a major issue, which involved the principle of white supremacy vs minorities. The current police brutality that has been occurring is culturally disconnecting ethnicities from one another. According to Cincinnati Police Chief Jeffrey Blackwell, “…the cultural disconnect is very real; you have the weight of generations of abuse on African Americans,” (Flatow, 2016). For example, over the past four years, there have been countless acts of police brutality. The three key deaths of Eric Garner, Philando Castile, and Alton Sterling have become the face of police brutality in the year 2016. People knew that it was unequal treatment of black people by police in the United States and they made it known by creating #BlackLivesMatter.
Remarks by President Obama at the eulogy for the honorable Reverend Clementa Pinckney; A man who was killed when an another man rushed into a church in South Carolina and killed 9 people while they were immersed in an afternoon mass. President Obama created different appeals and feelings through the use of different Rhetorical Devices such as Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. The use of logos ethos and pathos help the president convey his central idea which is to ensure the people of South Carolina and the people of the United States that not only are they safe, but they will unite to take this opportunity to create a more united U.S. This will happen through the establishment of new gun reforms.
Not only does repetition play a major role in Chisholm’s speech, but her dispersement of anaphoras indeed calls attention to her main point. Anaphoras allow her to emphasize her frustration and put forth the notion of the severity of discrimination and differences men and women had to endure during that time. An example of this is right in the beginning of her speech where she states: “It provides a legal basis for attack on the most subtle, most pervasive, and most institutionalized form of prejudice that exists,” where she explains how the Constitution was based on the equality of the American people, including between men and women. This quotation fulfills her point by expressing these prejudices in the superlative form. Because she placed
Dr. King had been one of the greatest leading person during the 21st century. Fifty years later till this day, the message he has portrayed, is still being reviewed today. The ideas that King had brought along in his speeches would still be relevant to civil problems that are occurring in the United States currently. One of the most incredible moments in his life at the time was when he conveyed his tendency from human rights onto the stage of the world; educating the listeners, while obtaining the Nobel Peace Prize Award.
Let’s take a step back to 2008 in Philadelphia. Neither the city nor year suggests that history is going to be made. On March 18, 2008, at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Barack Obama took the stage and delivered a speech that would portray the racial landscape of his presidency. In his speech, Obama points out rhetorical tactics to support his argument that we as Americans in this country need to be united for racial equality to exist. He begins his speech with a back story to highlight the kairotic moment present, then appeals to pathos through lots of examples of racial injustice to signify the need for such change, and then uses his appeals to ethos to suggest ways of change for Americans, both black and white. The speech was very successful: people from both sides praised his bravery, and later the same year, Obama demolished McCain in a close victory to secure his presidency.
Subsequently, the death of Trayvon Martin is seen as the motive to construct a response to anti-black racism, similarly known as The Black Lives Matter movement. To clarify, Shaun King author of ‘Black Lives Matter opposes police brutality, not police’ states, “I believe that brutal police officers should be held to the highest ethical standards and find it deplorable that abusive officer after abusive officer in America is far too often set free without punishment” (King). The author uses powerful diction such as