Is killing a dog really the best choice of gaining knowledge? In Claire McCarthy’s article, Dog Lab, she explains why determining right from wrong can sometimes be challenging. She tells her readers her experience as a medical student allowing her to perform cardiovascular surgery on a dog. She explains her journey through acknowledging personal experience, creating a tone, and implying diction. The tone of the story never the less, changes drastically as you read. It goes from sadness, to discomfort, then, eventually, disappointment. Throughout the article, McCarthy has to make some the hardest choices, and most challenging decisions despite her preparation in her field. In order to gain more knowledge McCarthy has to choose between stepping …show more content…
She explains her tone by using her own words, and viewpoints on how she felt after and during the experiment. McCarthy tone really changed drastically in the article. It went from exciting and interested to a little upsetting. She shows here happiness and excitement by quoting, “it was an exciting learning opportunity” (McCarthy 34). The reason why it changed so fast in her mind was because, not only were they going to view the cardiovascular system in real life for the first time, they were actually going to preform it on a real animal. “In addition, the words of choice that really describe the tone and the overall atmosphere of the topic is, disappointment, and sadness. The true reason why these words sum up this paragraph is because, McCarthy uses these words to describe, what she is felling and what she thinks about herself. McCarthy quotes, “she was disappointed in myself and in the lab” (McCarthy 36). In addition, she concludes that, the knowledge she gained wasn’t worth killing the dogs. McCarthy makes this her conclusion and one of her finial statements is because, it truly shows that even if you education is the line, why sacrifice another life to get that passing
Man’s best friend. When hearing this statement many people know that it is referring to a dog. But can it also be referring to a beer? Budweiser believes so. In their commercial, “Lost Puppy” Budweiser shows their viewers that not only can your dog be your best friend, but so can their beer. They use many forms of rhetoric to persuade their audience of this. Budweiser does a great job of using pathos to draw the attention of their audience. That is the first step, right? In order to persuade an audience of something, you must first have their attention.
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
Sometimes one must make a decision that puts to question what they believe is right, what they believe is wrong, and what they are willing to give up to make the decision. In the essay “Dog Lab” by Claire McCarthy, she recounts a story from when she was in medical school and her teacher gives them a choice on whether or not to participate in an experiment to learn about the vascular system. This experiment involves taking a perfectly healthy dog and putting him under anesthesia, cutting them open and pumping them full of different chemicals to see what they do to the heart. And then putting the dog down. Some would say that the decision is very cut and dry, either you do the experiment or you don't. But a very important thing to factor in is ho incredibly dedicated to her school work she was, in beginning of the essay she tries to explain why she became so focused in school with the phrase “My study now carried responsibility”. And she was correct, if there was ever a time that she wouldhave needed to buckle down and focus on her studies it would have been then. But she also tells ...
Many characters have hopes and dreams which they wish to accomplish. Of Mice and Men has two main characters that go through obstacles to get what they want. In the beginning it is George and Lennie running away trying to get a job. Once both George and Lennie have a job they try to accomplish their dreams. Unfortunately they both can't get their dreams to come true since lennie does the worst and George has to shoot Lennie. Steinbeck uses characterization, foreshadowing, and symbol as rhetorical strategies to make George's actions justified.
I chose this word because the tone of the first chapter seems rather dark. We hear stories of the hopes with which the Puritans arrived in the new world; however, these hopes quickly turned dark because the Purtains found that the first buildings they needed to create were a prison, which alludes to the sins they committed; and a cemetery, which contradicts the new life they hoped to create for themselves.
“A Modest Proposal” and “Let Them Eat Dog” have a common argument that we are dealing with over population of humans and animals. Swift uses satire to make us think that he really wants us to eat babies. Foer tells us of people eating animals were not accustomed to. This can put an economical strain on everyone if we don’t use our resources wisely. Both of these articles may be elusive for some to read. Both papers touch on the topics of eating animals, economic issues, and culture.
It is safe to say that the box next to the “boring, monotone, never-ending lecture” has been checked off more than once. Without the use of rhetorical strategies, the world would be left with nothing but boring, uniform literature. This would leave readers feeling the same way one does after a bad lecture. Rhetorical devices not only open one’s imagination but also allows a reader to dig deep into a piece and come out with a better understanding of the author’s intentions. Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Wife’s Story” is about a family that is going through a tough spot. However, though diction, imagery, pathos, and foreshadowing Guin reveals a deep truth about this family that the reader does not see coming.
Rhetoric may refer to the practice of argumentation that aims to influence or modify the perspectives of the target audience (Herrick, 2005, p. 3). Critically analysing the rhetoric context of an article could help us better apprehend the writer’s rhetoric moves as analytical readers, and attain useful techniques to improve as proficient writers. This essay will be evaluating and comparing the following sentences, which both successfully delivered powerful messages within the gender equality arena yet vary in terms of their rhetorical situation, rhetorical appeals, tone, structure and style.
A Modest Proposal, by Jonathan Swift, is a satirical pamphlet that was published to the public in 1729. Its purpose was to shock the citizens of Ireland with an appalling solution to their economic troubles at the time. Swift’s purpose for A Modest Proposal was to present a horrific solution for an ever growing problem in Ireland. He adopts an aloof but eerily serious tone to grab the attention of the lower and middle class.
McCarthy faced an ethical choice of performing an operation on a living dog. She had to choose between two sides. One which favored the dog lab because it was an excellent learning opportunity. She believed that “learning about the cardiovascular system on a living animal would make it more understandable and would therefore make us better doctors” (McCarthy 727). Another, where they valued the importance of life and did not want to kill a dog for their benefit since they could just learn the material by other means. McCarthy unable to dedicate herself to one side said “I didn’t want to kill a dog, but I certainly wanted to take advantage of every learning offered me” (McCarthy 727). She chooses to do the lab because it would have led her to become a better
Cormac McCarthy, an American novelist, and screenwriter attended an interview from a 2007 episode, hosted by Oprah Winfrey, an American media proprietor, actress, and producer.
Kristin found out that Bea was from a laboratory and decided to give her a loving home. In the first years of Bea’s life she was mute, pathologically fearful, and terrorized from the trauma she experienced for the laboratories. She even shook when someone approached her, and rolled over and urinated every time a man was around. When Kristin would take Bea to the vet she would shake uncontrollably with fear. This just goes to show how the trauma from these animal laboratories effects the animals. Luckily, from the love and care from Kristin Bea transformed into a healthy dog without fear of her new owners or veterinarians. This story shows that these animals need love, attention, and care that they are clearly not getting at the laboratories. (Williams, and
The subject of death is one that many have trouble talking about, but Virginia Woolf provides her ideas in her narration The Death of the Moth. The moth is used as a metaphor to depict the constant battle between life and death, as well as Woolf’s struggle with chronic depression. Her use of pathos and personification of the moth helps readers develop an emotional connection and twists them to feel a certain way. Her intentional use of often awkward punctuation forces readers to take a step back and think about what they just read. Overall, Woolf uses these techniques to give her opinion on existence in general, and reminds readers that death is a part of life.
Manipulation of language can be a weapon of mind control and abuse of power. The story Animal Farm by George Orwell is all about manipulation, and the major way manipulation is used in this novel is by the use of words. The character in this book named Squealer employs ethos, pathos, and logos in order to manipulate the other animals and maintain control.
“The pen is mightier than the sword.” This is a popular saying that explains that, sometimes, in order to persuade or convince people, one should not use force but words. In Animal Farm, by George Orwell, animals overthrow the human leader and start a new life, but some animals want to become the new leaders. To make the other animals obey the pigs, they first have to persuade the farm’s population. Squealer is the best pig for this job because he effectively convinces the animals to follow Napoleon by using different rhetorical devices and methods of persuasion.