Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay about eating meat
Good arguments about eating meat
Argumentative essay about eating meat
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essay about eating meat
Human Desire vs. Moral Judgement David Foster Wallace provides a controversial argument in his article, “Consider the Lobster,” by forcing his readers to not only think about how good their dinner may taste, but also how it got on their plate. He challenges the ethical standard which Americans use to reason with the idea that it is completely humane to put aside their morals when dealing with their taste buds, specifically when eating lobster. By using rhetorical devices ranging from the way he constructed his paper, to playing with different diction and focusing on emotional appeal throughout his essay, Wallace argues from both sides of the spectrum, (i.e., PETA member to Maine Lobster Fest fanatic), in order to assist his audience in considering …show more content…
His intended readers were originally the subscribers of Gourmet magazine, the probable suspects who have never thought twice about the value of the food that they consume, however, by connecting through very informal and amiable phraseology in the beginning of his work, making his work easy to read, he creates an atmosphere where any type of audience can relate to him. For instance, he describes the Maine Lobster Fest to readers that may have no idea what it was beforehand, and also goes into detail on how lobsters are killed and cooked to compare and contrast ways that already informed chefs would relate to. He invites readers to join him on his moral journey, without pressuring them into feeling a certain way, which is another one of the advantages that Wallace creates. He simply states the facts, both positive and negative, and encourages his audience to think about their own values on animal …show more content…
The second half of this article centers all around the question of whether or not lobsters are treated with the dignity that they may or may not deserve. Humans everywhere associate bold feelings when faced with the word “pain,” and that is why this method is most effective in persuading a group of people to try to understand something that they have never, and will never, actually experience, (i.e., being boiled alive). He states that there are two main differences of pain; “... (1) pain as a purely neurological event, and (2) actual suffering.” Actual suffering has to do with the awareness of pain being an unpleasant feeling, and having a preference to not feel it, which involves having some sort of emotional component. In contrast, he brings in the fact that there is a very high chance that lobsters, in fact, do have preferences, as they can detect water change and choose to migrate a certain way. Thanks to Wallace’s strategies, readers may argue back and forth as to what they choose to
The transition from childhood to adulthood can be challenging. There are many things to learn and let go. Sometime teenagers can dramatize certain events to make themselves seem defenseless. Amy Tan, Chinese-American author, makes her Chinese Christmas seem insufferable. In Tan’s passage “Fish Cheeks”, Tan uses diction and details to exemplify the indignity caused by her Chinese culture.
The lobsters are complex creatures, as David Foster Wallace explains in the essay, and the people that are going to the festival are making this complex creature so easy to kill. Wallace is able to validate this argument by using their complexity of life and the simplicity of their death to show the paradox that the festival has created explaining, “Taxonomically speaking, a lobster is a marine crustacean of the family Homaridae, characterized by five pairs of jointed legs, the first pair terminating in large pincerish claws used for subduing prey” (Wallace 55). Then later explaining, “Be apprised, though, that the Main Eating Tent’s suppers come in Styrofoam trays, and the soft drinks are iceless and flat” (Wallace 55). This paradox that Wallace brings to the attention to his audience show that these articulate and graceful creatures are being disgraced by the festival goers by being served on Styrofoam trays and served with unappealing beverages. It is no coincidence that two things that are really explained is the anatomy of the lobster and how complex the makeup of the lifeform is and the simplicity of the death of the lobster. By explaining these two things in depth, he is able to show how ridiculous and unfair he feels that killing and eating the lobster is. Wallace also humanizes the lobster to bring the situation into a perspective that
Throughout the United States many American’s go through and eat at fast food places such as, McDonalds, Burger King, and Jack ‘n the Box. Mainly unaware of the amount of weight one can gain if consuming it on a daily bases or even two times week, can cause health issues, diabetes and possibly obesity. This was the main premise for writer Dave Zinczenko essay Don’t Blame the Eater, who makes an argument that many people are becoming obese and diabetic because of the fast food they eat. He asks a regarding his concern; Shouldn 't we know better than to eat two meals a day in fast-food restaurants?, As a way to engage the general public, like parents and teenagers, he expresses his argument through his own experience when he was a teenager eating at fast food places and information on the fast food industry in regards to how many calories are in the food.
A common theme in entertainment today is the question “Just because I can, should I do it?” Usually this is applied to moral issues or controversial scientific breakthroughs. Yet, very little of the American public even bother to ask this about food science and production. As long as the food tastes good and is convenient, most people don’t really care. Melanie Warner, overall, was just like most Americans. In her book she documents how a former business journalist became infatuated with the longevity of cheese, guacamole, and other normal American cuisine. It’s a dark hole. Most readers will be horrified and confused with such production methods. While Warner’s book isn’t a scientific study, her neutral style and intriguing investigation
“Taxonomically speaking, a lobster is a marine crustacean of the family Homaridae, characterized by five pairs of jointed legs, the first pair terminating in large pincerish claws used for subduing prey…. Moreover, a crustacean is an aquatic arthropod of the class Crustacea, which comprises of crabs, shrimp, barnacles, lobsters, and freshwater crayfish” (Wallace, 55). This is an example of Logos since the author uses scientific facts to convey the message he wants to communicate in an objective way. Wallace also uses logos as a persuasive device by presenting facts on the science of the lobster’s neurological system and its ability to feel pain. The Maine Lobster Promotion Council states “The nervous system of a lobster is very simple, and is in fact most similar to the nervous system of a grasshopper. It is decentralized with no brain. There is no cerebral cortex, which in humans is the area of the brain that gives the experience of pain”. Wallace counter-argues this statement by mentioning the fact that since lobsters have a simpler nervous system compared to humans, they are unable to produce their own natural opiates. “One can conclude that lobsters are maybe even more vulnerable to pain, since they lack mammalian nervous systems’ built-in analgesia, or, instead, that the absence of natural opioids implies an absence of the really intense
because many argue the lobster is being tortured (Wallace, 2007). Farm animal abuse is a big
As I have progressed through this class, my already strong interest in animal ethics has grown substantially. The animal narratives that we have read for this course and their discussion have prompted me to think more deeply about mankind’s treatment of our fellow animals, including how my actions impact Earth’s countless other creatures. It is all too easy to separate one’s ethical perspective and personal philosophy from one’s actions, and so after coming to the conclusion that meat was not something that was worth killing for to me, I became a vegetarian. The trigger for this change (one that I had attempted before, I might add) was in the many stories of animal narratives and their inseparable discussion of the morality in how we treat animals. I will discuss the messages and lessons that the readings have presented on animal ethics, particularly in The Island of Doctor Moreau, The Dead Body and the Living Brain, Rachel in Love, My Friend the Pig, and It Was a Different Day When They Killed the Pig. These stories are particularly relevant to the topic of animal ethics and what constitutes moral treatment of animals, each carrying important lessons on different facets the vast subject of animal ethics.
In order to start the analysis the first step is to question what makes up the composition. In the composition, a pregnant woman with long dark brown curly hair is standing in pink sheer lingerie, white underwear, white above the ankle socks, and house slippers. She is standing on a cliff in rocky terrain, overlooking many houses diagonally angled and countering each other, full green trees, and a sunrise where the sun is breaking through the clouds making the sky pastel, pink, blue, purple and hints of a warm golden yellow. She is looking up at grey squared off fish above her face whom is swimming toward a whole sea/school of fish that look similar to the fish at the very top of the composition.
Unlike many essays on fast food, Gladwell does not aim to place blame, condemn, or renounce the consumption of fast food. Instead, he challenges preconceived ideas and popular opinions about fast food, while questioning and concluding why people continue to eat food with such a bad reputation.
Throughout the essay, Berry logically progresses from stating the problem of the consumer’s ignorance and the manipulative food industry that plays into that ignorance, to stating his solution where consumers can take part in the agricultural process and alter how they think about eating in order to take pleasure in it. He effectively uses appeals to emotion and common values to convince the reader that this is an important issue and make her realize that she needs to wake up and change what she is doing. By using appeals to pathos, logos, and ethos, Berry creates a strong argument to make his point and get people to change how they attain and eat food.
The purpose of the essay is to give some light on the Maine Lobster Festival. Being held every year in late July, thousands of people are in attendance to the states festivities. One descriptive writing that is used in this essay is descriptive language. They focus on ideas that are coinciding with their thesis. I believe the writer uses descriptive language as he describes the story in which he is telling to his readers. In, Consider the Lobster, Wallace (2004) states,"The point is that lobsters are basically giant sea-insects.3
Have you ever felt yourself cruel when you are eating meat? Michael Pollan represents his struggle to defend his meat eating habit in “An Animal’s Place”. In the first several pages, he narrates the arguments of Peter Singer and discusses whether the animals should be viewed equally as human. At this point, he tries to illustrate many distinctions between the animals and the humans, but he finds it still hard to decide whether it is right for people to consume meat. Pollan also describes what goes on behind the scenes in the meat industry and this turns out to be a call to us to think about the real welfare for the animals. After doing a lot of research, he then finds out that there are some farms working for animals’
In the book Animal Farm Orwell uses rhetorical appeals to draw attention to his allegorical tale of the Russian Revolution. The rhetorical appeals are Ethos, Pathos, Logos.
The Maine Lobster Festival is supposed to be a celebration inviting anyone and everyone to celebrate the delectable lobster, but Wallace uses it to shed some light on the welfare of the animal when cooking and eating it. He does a great job at analyzing the festival as well as challenging the meaning of food based on how we define the animals we consume. This includes the substitution of words, people’s ignorance, and the scientific language. The way we identify food can all be supported by these three main influences.
The human ego has an undeniable knack for inserting itself into the world. Yet, even with this self-insertion, humans want to stay separate from nature, beings sentient yet dependant upon nature, a sort of parasite which feeds on the beauty around them and fuel their massive culture from it. Author Robert Finch in his essay, Very Like a Whale, uses profound ambiguity to illustrate the pull on humans to the somewhat forgotten natural world.