Rhetorical Analysis Of Competitive Blowss To The Head While Playing Football

1175 Words3 Pages

According to Jason M. Breslow, players that receive repetitive blows to the head while playing football are more susceptible to life-threatening health concerns after their respective playing careers. Breslow’s decision to speak out about this controversial topic in his article with PBS may be extremely valuable with regards to recent legal actions filed against the National Football League, the NFL. This article may also be critical to those people who are debating whether to continue their playing careers, and to those who are considering picking up the sport for the first time. Breslow initiates the conversation by pointing out that an astronomical amount of NFL players who reported deteriorating conditions such as memory loss and depression …show more content…

Through the use of advanced statistics, in-depth interviews with doctors and other professionals, and emotional appeal, Breslow successfully reveals to the audience the connection that the NFL has hid from players, parents, and fans for years: head injuries suffered while playing in the NFL are directly correlated with CTE and other traumatic diseases.
Breslow uses a variety of statistics and other factual evidence as a means of the rhetorical appeal of logos to persuade the audience that playing football and receiving multiple blows to the head can lead to life-threatening diseases later on in life. One of the main factual pieces of evidence that Breslow uses is from a recent study that was conducted by researchers from the Department of Veteran Affairs and Boston University. In this study, eighty-seven of the ninety-one NFL players tested …show more content…

This enables him to get his message across in a manner such that the audience is influenced and takes his approach on this issue. Breslow primarily does this by mentioning the release of the film Concussion. This film highlights the embarrassing time period of the NFL in which the league “sought to refute research suggesting football may contribute to brain disease” (Breslow). This statement really hits home with parents and former players. There may have been hundreds, if not thousands, of athletes who went on to play football in their careers and did not know about these life-threatening risks. Had these athletes known about the risks, they may have chosen not to play football. This is why this emotional appeal hits home with parents and former players. Now that parents are informed about the risks, they may not let their kids play a sport that would endanger their health for the rest of their lives. Breslow’s claim in which the league refuted evidence could very well scare the audience and instill fear of a potential situation in which someone’s own son had to endure the pain that the eighty-seven NFL former NFL players did. The emotional appeal of pathos is manifested in this text in order to inform the audience of the extreme measures taken place by the NFL to suppress potential evidence linking itself

Open Document