Revolution Rebellion Resistance Selbin Summary

628 Words2 Pages

I decided to do my final assignment in the form of the extended review. I chose the book “Revolution, Rebellion, Resistance: The Power Story” by Eric Selbin, which we covered much later in this semester. Revolution, Rebellion, Resistance: The Power of Story is very different from a lot of the other studies of revolution that came out years before it and also different from the few ones I read in some of my Sociology classes and also history classes. Selbin presents his approach to revolutions different as he use the use of stories to get his message across about revolutions and for the reader can understand them as well. He basically does it this way to answer unanswered questions. They are not necessarily unanswered questions, but they are …show more content…

Selbin touches on three topics: revolution, rebellion, and resistance. These topics are separated into four categories; four different stories that centers around revolution in the world. Three aspects of the stories that are used to relate and connect revolutions are myth, mimesis, and memory. The three words rebellions, revolution and resistance come from some ancient myths. Those myths involve Greco-Roman revolutionary leaders, some local events that are considered legendary and also recent revolutions and social movements that attributed to society. With these different stories and Selbin's focus on society and on culture, Revolution, Rebellion, Resistance offers another perspective on the connection, distinctiveness, and individual points between the several revolutionary cases to get answers and more …show more content…

By Selbin having the use of stories in his material, Selbin is able to think critically about the different components of revolution and also different revolutions from different time periods. Selbin’s focus on people-whether individual or collectively, and communities enables him to analyze the society and culture factors. but at the expense of using more measurable quantitative or qualitative factors of more structural, often state-centered approaches. He does not ignore such factors as political, economic and social structures. Nor does he completely ignore ideologies, and the context regarding internationals, or structural studies that have explanatory factors, but he wanted to bring out the importance of the role of agency. He focused on the role of agency by targeting the people and/or societies that attribute to revolutions. The idea that individuals, communities, and cultures, influence the formation and effects of revolutions, rebellions, and resistance, is in obvious contrast to Skocpol, who quotes Wendell Phillips as "quite correct when he once declared: 'Revolutions are not made; they come'"(Skocpol, p.17). If revolutions just “come”,

Open Document