Review of the film “Anatomy of Hate: A Dialogue for Hope”

668 Words2 Pages

The film “Anatomy of hate” examines hate and prejudice towards different race or minorities in the modern society, through the examples of multiple groups which have specific ideologies or participate in violent conflicts. The director of the film Michael Ramsdell, spent six years working and filming such groups like: White Supremacist movement, Muslim extremists, the Westboro church Christian fundamentalists, Israeli-Palestinian movement, and US soldiers operating in Iraq.
I believe that the purpose of the film was to explain to the viewer that hatred very often originates from anger and fear. Michael Ramsdell is trying to reveal the underlying causes and possible solutions to hate war and violence. He shows us that those emotional and biological mechanisms that make us vulnerable to acts and beliefs of hate can be similarly used to make us proficiently overcome these traits.
So, does anger can be the origin of hate? For sure it can be. After watching few minutes of this film I wanted to bit the crap out of that Billy Roper Nazi bastard. I hated him from the bottom of my guts after few minutes of listening to his psycho-babble. His statements triggered anger in me, and I wanted to hurt him really bad. I hated him not because I am minority or gay, I am none of that, but because my country (Russia) heavily suffered from Nazism during World War II. During whole my life I was taught by teachers, parents, mass media and trough my culture that Nazism is bad and cannot be tolerated. It also can serve as example showing that hate can be passed and taught from generation to generation, and can be based on historical events that cannot be forgotten.
People also can hate each other based on their origins, religion, and philosophy or sim...

... middle of paper ...

... that turn ideological dispositions of hate into the physical violence inflicted on those that are supposedly representative for that loss. Not the leaders who are responsible for the conflict and involvement of belligerent sides, but simply representatives of the race or the nation participating in this conflict and “presumably responsible” in the death of the soldier.
In the conclusion “Anatomy of Hate” ends on an optimistic note, concentrating on the stories of change and hope. Some of those stories include the same people from earlier in the film. Before they calmly spoke of destroying the enemy and the beauty of killing of opposed, and now they calmly preach dialogue as the true path forward to peace. These type of moments help to end the “Anatomy of hate” on a note of hope and optimism, that one day our world we be clean of the hate that polluting it.

More about Review of the film “Anatomy of Hate: A Dialogue for Hope”

Open Document