Review Of Nakae Chomin's A Discourse By Three Drunkards

889 Words2 Pages

In Nakae Chomin’s A Discourse by Three Drunkards on Government, Chomin delineates a discussion between three men; the Gentleman of Western Learning, the Champion of the East, and Master Nankai. For the most part, the book handles the question of Japan’s future, for which each of these men has distinct view on. Although through the amiable and democratic viewpoint of the Gentleman of Western Learning and the belligerent nationalist viewpoint of the Champion of the East, Chomin shows appreciation towards western political theories and understanding of traditional Japanese approach, His personal views are conveyed through the character of Master Nankai.
The Gentleman of Western Learning, with his “demands for democracy and peace (p. 28), uses pacifism as a central theme in his arguments. When discussing the use of weapons in Japan, the Gentleman says that, “If we adopt liberty as our army and navy, equality as our fortress, and fraternity as our sword and cannon, who in the world would dare attack us? ... if, on the contrary, we should rely exclusively on our fortresses, swords, cannon, and troops, our opponent would also rely on his” (p. 51). This means that he thinks if Japan uses weapons, their enemies will use weapons as well. In order to avoid violent conflict, the Gentleman proposes that Japan should address other nations with civility as opposed to hostility. Corroborating his argument for democracy, the Gentleman says in regards to the French government, “France’s true strength grew out of the great results of the Revolution in1789” (p. 59). He also relates this to Germany in saying that “until the ideology of the French Revolution reached Germany, the nation was divided into many parts” (60). By saying these things, the Ge...

... middle of paper ...

...d themselves are considered weak. I feel that every country should have the right to defend itself if need be. I agree with Master Nanakai’s idea on political reform, how a radical change should not be made. However, a series of small political reforms gradually leading up to the acceptance of democracy in politics should be made. Generally, despite Master Nanakai’s somewhat middle ground, I am more partial towards the Gentleman’s utopian pacifistic view on how challenges should be faced. Although, I also agree in part with the Champion and Master Nankai. I do not think it is significant that three drunkards conducted the discussion. In reading the book, I found myself forgetting “what” they were, and focusing more on what individuals had to say. I do not think that the fact that they were drunkards had any sort of effect on each man’s clearly stated point of view.

More about Review Of Nakae Chomin's A Discourse By Three Drunkards

Open Document