Rethinking The Color Line In Ronald Takaki's A Different Mirror

639 Words2 Pages

In Ronald Takaki’s A Different Mirror, it talks about the color line between blacks and whites. On page 49 it stated, “What struck the English most about Africans was their color. “These people are all black, and are called Negros, without any apparell, saving before their privities.” This relates going back to Article Three in Rethinking the Color Line first thing we notice about someone is their race. People get judged by the way they look, for the English mind the color black for them was bad for example, “deeply stained with dirt, “foul,” “dark or deadly” in purpose, “malignant,” “sinister,” “wicked.” In other words being black is a horrible thing as for the color white it signified purity, innocence, and goodness. Blacks and whites could never coexist in America. “The real …show more content…

In the reading it had mentioned about how Blacks were inferior, which I believe they are seen that way when whites are seen as superiors. On page 60, it also mentioned that the planters had a choice between expanding opportunities to whites or solidifying the line “based on class and race” and exploiting workers from Africa. Blacks were punished more harshly, and were not afforded the opportunities of future freedom, as many of the whites had. There was also a law that made it illegal for white women to be with black men, and the women would be punished. The mixed race children were called mulattos, and were eventually forced into slavery. In Rethinking the Color Line by Charles A. Gallagher it had mentioned how we cannot conveniently racially categorize someone who is racially “mixed” or of an ethnic racial group with which we are not familiar. According to Charles A. Gallagher, there was legislation put in place to decide whether these children were considered "black" or not. Initially, it was to be that a child was considered black or white based on the "condition" of their

Open Document