Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rent control essay
Pros of rent control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rent Control: Pros and Cons Rent control is the government imposition of price ceilings on rent for apartments in certain areas of a city. The goal is usually to protect the rights of the poor. Thus, in a rent controlled or rent stabilized building, the amount of rent will not increase as quickly as inflation. While the moral side of rent control may have some appeal, in the long run the disadvantages far outweigh the advantages. Those who argue in favor of rent control say that it is the only way to protect lower-income tenants from landlords who overprice, and from being forced to move out of a neighborhood because they cannot afford the rent. Limiting the price that a landlord can demand helps maintain a city's ethnic diversity and prevents the creation of slums on the outskirts of the main city. Another thing that proponents say is that by linking rent prices to apartment maintenance and material improvements, rent control actually improves the state of housing. Overall, they argue that the goals of rent control can be reached if they are administered in a careful and just way. The opponents, though, have both theoretical and practical experience on their side. First, rent control creates a market that is unfair for everyone. Since the rent is set at a lower than normal level, an unsatisfied demand is created. This increase in demand leads to an increase in the cost of rents in the uncontrolled sector. Thus, two types of rents are created: those that are unfairly cheap, and those that are unfairly expensive. Another problem that is created is that landlords who own rent controlled apartments are often not able to earn enough money to adequately maintain buildings. This leads to run-down, poor quality housing. In many cases, landlords lose so much money that they are not able to even pay the debt on the properties, and they abandon them. Both of these effects have been documented in New York and elsewhere, and go against the goals of rent control. Finally, rent control has the bad side effect of turning away new construction. This is because even if rent controls don't include new constructions, owners are afraid to build any new buildings if in a few years those too will be taken over by rent control. Rent control thus leads to less construction and an even greater unsatisfied demand. This, in turn, increases the rents of uncontrolled apartments even more. New constructions are also avoided because banks and insurance companies don't want to invest in areas where rent control is in effect, because they know that it is likely that landlords will not be able to
“How can a middle-class family afford a rent of $2,000 or even $2,800 when the family consists of four children and a single working parent. when food needs to be on the table every night and bills need to be paid. I find this ridiculous, no one ever wanted to live in Bushwick and now all of a sudden these people want to live here.” -
One of the most prominent concerns of Evicted is the issue of inescapable financial instability as it relates to eviction. In the very first few pages of the book, Desmond reveals that the majority of poor renting families in America spend over 50% of their income on housing, with an even more astonishing one in four spending over 70% of their income on it (4). When families are spending the majority of their already meager income on housing alone, it is no surprise that they have little money left for savings or self-betterment programs such as a college education. Compounded with this is the fact that some welfare systems are constructed in a way that discourages long-term financial responsibility. For example, Supplemental Security Income, a program that provides monthly stipends for low-income elderly or disabled individuals, is revoked if individuals have too much money in their bank account (217). For
If the government were able to lower rental costs, would it benefit those who cannot afford an increase in rent? This would be the immediate benefit. People would be able to better afford where they live. The issue is that the overall outcome is not considered. Rent control leads to unjust opportunities for those wanting to rent. The current residents would likely stay because of cheaper rent. It discourages landlords to repair or improved rental facilities since they no longer have a financial incentive. It also encourages the landlord to abandon current properties because of
Although the recent tech boom in San Francisco has been blamed for the increased housing demand and the lack of affordable rental housing in the City, the reality is that the shortage of affordable rental housing been steadily climbing for the last 35 years. Rent control is oftenat the center of the controversy regarding the affordable housing shortage. In response to high inflation, and escalating rents, San Francisco’s Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance was passed in 1979 (Forbes, Sheridan, 1999). Rent control imposes restrictions on landlords in regards to rent increases and evictions. It is estimated that seventy percent of San Francisco’s rental units are under rent control (Marti, Shortt, 2013). Because of the limited rent increases allowed, tenants living in these rent controlled apartments seldom move out, which severely impacts the vacancy rates in the City. Although the vacancy rate among rent-controlled units is extremely low, there are occasions when a tenant may vacate a rent control unit (a job out of the area, the decision to purchase a home, etc.). When a rent-controlled unit is voluntarily vacated, the landlord is allowed to raise the rent to market rates (this is called vacancy de-control); then the rent control annual increase takes effect on the new rent. A landlord will often raise the new rent to the highest possible price the market will allow, in an attempt to recoup the financial loss he is incurring on the units still under rent control. Because of the new higher rent, the previously affordable unit is no longer considered affordable; which then impacts the inventory of affordable housing in San Francisco.
With the ratio still on a downward trend from 2012, construction of new apartments and condominiums is one of the fastest-growing segments in the construction industry, though slowdown is expected heading into 2021 as the economy continues to improve and home buying, in turn, will increase. (Apartment & Condominium Construction in the US: Market Research Report, 2016) With the trend for millennials to delay home ownership, landlords have some insulation to market fluctuations, but still need to be cognizant of anticipated increases in the rent/price ratio.
Instead of focusing on the relationship between federal housing policy and segregation, as does Mohl, DiPasquale explores how rental housing and federal policies affect each other. In her article, “Rental Housing: Current Market Conditions and the Role of Federal Policy,” DiPasquale challenges the federal policies that were in place at the time she wrote her article. She brings to attention her belief that in the past, government policies have given much of their focus to homeowners and little to the renter. Through her research, DiPasquale had found that rental housing had become increasingly less affordable, especially to poorer tenants, who are spending a greater portion of their income on rent. This not only poses a problem to the renters, but also to the landlords, for if the renters cannot pay the rent, the landlords get a vacancy and no income from their property. She also asserts her belief that homeownership is not for everyone, and uses evidence from the recent housing crisis to support her claim. Her article calls for a revamping of current federal policies to level the playing field between home owning and renting. By doing so, households will have more choices available to them when it comes to choosing suitable housing for them
New York City is not only a tourist attraction, but considered one of the most expensive cities in the world to fund because of its superb security, overall popularity, and partly its dependence on Wall Street to pay high income taxes to fund social programs, such as those who help homeless individuals and low-income residents. Ever since Bloomberg's re-election in 2005 he warned New Yorker's that because of a gaping budget deficit the city may have to raise property tax and state tax. The only people who struggle the most from increasing taxes are those who are barely able to pay rent and other expenses, such as utilities bills. One of the reasons why increasing taxes affect individuals is because as property taxes rise the property owner has to spend more, which means his/her profits may be affected, thus increasing the rent of tenants (the most current increase was 4% in one-year leases and 7.25% in two-year leases). In the other hand residents that currently live in homeless shelters have fewer chances of finding an affordable apartment even if he/she obtains a job (Most of the jobs homeless shelters refuges receive are low-paying jobs).
One reason why people become homeless could be due to the decline of housing units affordable to extremely low income households (National Resource Center on Homelessness and Mental Illness).
Core-need as stated by Banting (1990) as people who are living in an overcrowded environment, no running water, or no flush toilets is at 32% of the population in Ontario. Within the Toronto area there are a number of rent geared to income and co-op housing to help alleviate some of the stress of the cost of rent. Rent geared to income and co-op housing aims to make sure that only 30% of the renter’s income goes towards housing and utilities. Public housing allows the occupier to spend less on rent, in hopes of helping those under the poverty line create a balanced life through a less impoverished
Compare and contrast the ways in which housing inequalities are discussed from the perspectives of social policy and criminology, and economics (TMA 02)
The American dream was owning a house with a white picket fence. Now this dream is impossible. Individuals and families find it more difficult to find a decent home to rent in a suitable living area. According to Huffington Post, the hourly wage needed to afford a two bedroom apartment in California is at least $26 an hour. This is more than triple the minimum wage. Eviction, relocation, and inflation are the common keywords that associate with affordable housing. I 'm hoping to persuade you to support affordable housing for all. Today, I will be discussing, one, inflation of the housing market that needs to decrease, two, eviction from homes, three having to move to communities far from their work site.
Arnott, Richard. "Time for Revisionism on Rent Control?" The Journal of Economic Perspectives (1986-1998) 9.1 (1995): 99.ProQuest. Web. 12 Mar. 2014.
One should be using ⅓ of their income to pay for housing or rent to have money left over for other necessities. For most Oregonians, this is not the case. According to an article “Raise the Roof” forty percent of Oregon renters are paying more than ⅓ of their income (Strege-Flora). With such unaffordable housing, a rising of an “alarming number of evictions of low- and fixed-income… homelessness, and housing instability [has spread] throughout Oregon (Vilet). Sandy Burke is one of the many victims of this housing dilemma. She was a resident of The Lower Pines in Ashland, Oregon and was at the time “in immediate danger of losing [her] home,” (“Strege-Flora”) along with the rest of the residents in The Lower Pines. All residents were given a one-year eviction notice with no help to move or relocate. Luckily, Oregon Action stepped into the situation and fought before the city council for what is right and advocating the “general lack of affordable housing in Ashland” (“Strege-Flora”). If it weren’t for the Oregon Action, all of the residents would have been homeless. Oregon’s lack of affordable housing drives many into homelessness and “a recent study found that 9,000 homeless people sought shelter assistance every night… [and] Oregon shelters must turn away hundreds of people each night” (“Strege-Flora”). Homelessness is not scarce in Oregon and while many of
The main problem rent control can create to landlords is the case of the tenant do not move out because of the good rental price. That causes the landlords to lose money by not being able to increase the rental price of their units. Besides, the price of maintenance continues to increase, causing landlords to not earn any profit with their ...
Arlene, while in poverty, was not originally “struggling,” Ariene had a steady income with two boys in school. One day one of her boys threw a snowball at a car which resulted in the driver kicking in their front door, From that moment forward Arlene began to struggle. With one eviction on her record Arlene struggled to be accepted by other property companies, and landlords. Not only did her eviction cause her issues being accepted but, having two little boys increased her struggle. For mothers in poverty who have kids, their chances of being accepted for housing decreases dramatically. But why? Because kids are high risk, kids break things, get in accidents, are loud, sometimes cry, the list goes on and on. Landlords, in turn, do not want kids in their units as there is a higher risk of damage and/or increased noise complaints from