Reflection On Student Identity

565 Words2 Pages

The school worked well as part of the LDP building relationships with a wide range of professionals. Engaging with this pilot programme was by choice, which was reforming my identity through a culture change for the school whilst keeping my educational beliefs intact. (see page 97) This identity change, although singular and individual to myself was also changing the identity of the school.

To ensure working in this more integrated way was sustainable I began to change and develop the skills and knowledge of the pastoral team. This inclusion into school life supported my core values with concern for the welfare and broad educational outcomes of all pupils but particularly those coming from disadvantaged homes. Slowly we gained parental …show more content…

The work of the LDP representing locally supported integrated services, was not rolled out across the county. It was still maintained in the practice of those professionals involved in the pilot but not a focus of the local authority. Disappointingly the pilot changed direction and integrated services moved away from the day-to-day school business. I believe this is yet another example of Foucault’s description of governmentality, changing the minds of people of the time. My trained support staff continued the early identification process through the use of the CAF but they were no longer invited in the same way to join the multi agency meetings. I consider that this was a backward step for the children and parents of School B. I believe the traditionally accepted role of the head teacher had the potential to become wider in time with a significant positive effect on the achievement of the child. The effect of this change of direction was that I lost the links to children’s services and consequently as a group of leaders (working rather like ‘the team around the child’ at a strategic level) we were unable to influence each other’s thinking. We no longer had alternative opportunities to help the child who may be ‘at risk’ of exclusion. I conclude that, as part of a partnership leading services for children, we were stronger and had a more consequential effect on child development. Together we had a chance of supporting the challenges of deprivation rather than relying on education

Open Document