Reflection Of The Last Supper

2320 Words5 Pages

The second part of the volume consists of a collection of essays that focus on filmmaking. The opening chapter takes us for a life-journey to the holy city of Benares, the city of death, through the eyes of the maverick filmmaker Robert Gardner. Schmitz follows Gardner’s esoteric steps from the Ghats to the holy river of Ganges, in a transcendental journey from life to death and back to life as documented in Gardner’s Forest of Bliss (1986). Schmitz highlights the authoritative and idiosyncratic character of Gardner’s filmmaking in terms of his manipulation of time and space and unique visual language, which aesthetically renegotiate the firm categorizations of ethnographic and avant-garde cinema. By focusing on the uniqueness of “Gardner’s …show more content…

By re-reading the narrative of The Last Supper within the historical context of the time it was produced, Sahasrabudhe argues that Alea’s authoritative and subversive film-style critically reflects upon the Cuban failure to meet the ambitious target of La Gran Granja, the harvest of ten million tons of sugar production in the 1970s, which was meant to pay for resources acquired from the Soviet Bloc. Sahasrabudhe argues that Alea reverses the religious narrative of Christ’s Last Supper, visually imagined in Leonardo da Vinci’s famous revisionist painting, through a serious of poetic, and at times, ironic visual and narrative metaphors, which enable the auteur director to evoke the exploitative duality of sugar plantations at the time of colonial slavery (the complementary ideological and exploitative system of the combination of free labour and Christian religion). In a subversive, but equally, subtle way, Alea offers a critique of Fidel Casto’s failed government policies following the success of the Cuban Revolution. This collective disillusion is reconstructed within the grey areas of metaphor and representation, in which the personal politics of the auteur meet the collective disillusion of the audience. Sahasrabudhe and Tiwary approach Alea and Jia Zhang-ke …show more content…

The auteurs discussed in this volume write from the inside of the society they address, however, they may see themselves as outsiders. Their liminal position, in-between opposite worlds elevates them to a kind of Weberian “charismatic” auteurs or readers, beyond the analytical framework of prophecy and religion. Through writing and filmmaking, the auteur’s intention opens up to the aesthetical world of the audience’s cosmos. The auteur accepts the role of the charismatic prophet, whose poetic metaphors open to the potentiality of transforming the reader or viewer from within, by critically reflecting upon the collective consciousness of a particular historical and political framework through which the text or film was produced. This paradoxical and amateurish condition, being outsiders and insiders at the same time, empowers them to accurately offer semi-fictional or fictional accounts of their own experiences in the world, emancipated from the burden of professional anthropology. Furthermore, it enables them to historically contextualize and politicize the material they have gathered from their lived experiences, represented through fictional or semi-fictional chunks of everyday life. It is this emancipating freedom that fiction gives to ethnographic writing, which radically reverses the politics of representation in ethnography, moving away

More about Reflection Of The Last Supper

Open Document