Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Creative writing about a soldier in war
Narrative about war experience
Redeployment by phil klay: analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Creative writing about a soldier in war
When we first discussed about what would convey the essence of the book Redeployment we first thought of covering a mannequin with objects and quotes that were essential to the book. We later realized it wouldn't fully capture all of the stories of the troops the were described in the book so we decided to abandon the idea of the mannequin head and instead use a military uniform because it would represent the main focal point of the book which was the troops. We then thought of how we would be able to convey the different views and thoughts of the troops. So we decide to choose quotes from different characters from the book to represent their thoughts. We also placed words on the uniform that were commonly brought up in the book which were …show more content…
The Books flaws where the change in perspectives. It never had one main character it would change from character to character and it would cause a change in the story which wasn’t a trait I liked. But my favorite part of the book was the humor and the description of the life of a veteran after the war. I expected the book to be lenient on combat experiences, but I surprised when that wasn’t the case. It was full of humor. There was never a dull moment in the book it was constantly filled with edgy jokes that constantly made me lose my breath. But the humor wasn't all that was good with the book. The description of life after the war was another trait of the book I found phenomenal.In the twelve stories he describes the challenging task of coming back home because of strained relationship they come back to because of the time they had been separated and the disconnect of troops and citizens.Phil Klay states that “when you get back to the States no civilians will be able to understand what you've gone through?'”. But the part I resonated most with the book was the humor. The humor in the book is not for everyone. Some may not find it as hilarious as I do. An example of the humor is when Klay says “ Harvey asked how he knew what santa’s assshole tasted like and mac said. Yo, son. You signed your enlistment papers. Don't act like you ain't have a taste.”. I don't expect everyone to find it as hilarious as I
what kinda sucked about it is that they dragged out to the end. which made you know what's going to happen when ending came. that's why it was so dull cause I was on the last page and Sam still hasn't been killed yet so I knew right away what was going to happen. Recommendations: I would recommend this if you want to study the sight affects of the war.
In The Red Badge of Courage, Henry Fleming was drawn to enlist by his boyhood dreams. His highly romanticized notion of war was eclectic, borrowing from various classical and medieval sources. Nevertheless, his exalted, almost deified, conception of the life of a soldier at rest and in combat began to deflate before the even the ink had dried on his enlistment signature. Soon the army ceased to possess any personal characteristics Henry had once envisioned, becoming an unthinking, dispas...
Martin Blumesfield's writing of this book is a very interesting book. His way of writing really gets the point across and makes you think like you there. He uses many rhetoric devices to enhance his writing and get what he's trying to do. He uses many similes and figurative language to back up his point of him being there. He has many of Patton's paper and he actually can relate to whats going on through his interpretation of the "Patton Papers." Many say this is the greatest Patton book out there and I agree. The way Blumesfield makes you feel is so real, you can appreciate a good writer when you find one like Blumesfield.
When the quote says “that part of the story is my own” it must mean O’Brien had taken some true details from personal stories. Could O’Brien taken true information but tried to throw the readers off to keep some privacy for the men the stories were based off? Some of the stories present within the book are completely out of the water. How could O’Brien imagine those ideas up without a base of what actually happened? I believe O’Brien switched the names of the soldiers but kept the stories. If he did the name switching it could emphasize on how the reader could focus on the ideas and situations, not the people. O’Brien would showcase how these situations can affect everyone. Another challenging aspect for me is if the stories are partly true why not honor those written about. Do the soldiers feel shame reading about their failures? O’Brien wrote his novel upon the hopes of helping his PTSD and it could have helped the veterans read and receive help. Along with help the vets it could supply the vets with the honor they
... a "lost cause." Many children grow up with the thought of one day becoming a hero; only a few can complete the feat. In my opinion, Philip Caputo is an irreprehensible character in American History who totally fit the role of a hero, and became "A LEADER OF MEN" (6) as the Marine slogan states. I believe the fact that he became mentally unstable and ended up killing innocent people is wrong, but I also believe it wasn't his fault. The war was at fault for Caputo's downfall, the war was at fault for the depletion of all the soldier's mental stability, and the war was at fault for every casualty the United States was forced to deal with. My thoughts after reading this book are that war can really take a toll on someone and war can bring out the worse in everyone.
Based on true story, Lieutenant Phillip Caputo and his experience of the Vietnam War. During this era there was a rebalance act within the young adults community in America, they did not want to live the boring and peaceful life their parents lived. This generation of young adults got fixated on the stories and heroes that came from the WWII and what they can do to experience this “trill” first hand. The novel is written with Lieutenant Phillip Caputo in mind starting when he first enrolled in the Marine Corps at the age of 20 in hopes of chasing his fixated dream of the war. At first Phillip had this elusion that the war would only last a couple of months and that he’ll be the American hero everyone talked about. Then the slap to the face
Or the way that they all look up to the pantyhose as an almost godly relic. All the way to Norman Bowker finally realizing that courage comes from within, not from winning the Silver Star. These things, made up the soldiers attributes, made up the soldiers’ persona, made up the soldiers. But they didn’t stop at the soldier; certain items characterized all the soldiers as a collective group. It even went as far as to describe an entire group by the things all of them carried, of course, being the green berets.
Billy was not dressed as a soldier should be, lacking a helmet, an overcoat, a weapon, and boots. In fact, “He didn’t look like a soldier at all. He looked like a filthy flamingo” (33). Much like other children sent into the war, Billy was not prepared for what he would face. To other soldiers he seems laughable, a joke on the face of the entire army, but all other soldiers are as unprepared as Billy. Billy’s comical appearance acts as a symbol of his placement in the war; in other words, a scrawny, unprepared soldier is absurd during wartime.
I think my favorite thing about this novel was the realistic ending. Some books try to just give you a fairy tale but this book had an ending that mad you think in the end if I was in the same position would I do the same thing. I didn’t like the fact that the novel portrayed mental illness in a way to say that it needed to be hidden and protected. I thought this novel was very believable for the time period that it was set in. I think the ending to this novel was perfect it was an accurate ending to this
...uage in the book was vulgar and depicted gruesome visuals and Terry made no attempt to polish these veterans’ words. This overall made the experiences of the veteran’s that much more realistic. Even though there is no order in which the stories are told, there still is a sense of cohesiveness. Each individual story is different but yet they all go along with one another due to the themes of the stories. This book was historically correct and would be recommended to anyone who is unaware of the details of the Vietnam war since the first-hand stories would provide a better insight on what was actually experienced. Wallace Terry’s purpose in writing this novel was to seek out “a representative cross section of the black combat force.”(p. XV) Terry achieved his purpose by showing his audience that black war veterans endured the same as whites and perhaps even more.
I really liked this book because of the stories it had in it, that really helped me understand how bad these times really were, and how the treatment was horrible. I read a lot of how strict they were which was a part of my essay.
...s were so long. I was just about sick of cod after I was only half way through the chapter. I feel like Greenberg could have done a better job of separating the book and make it more readable. While I really enjoyed Greenberg’s opening personal story, I did not see its purpose by the end of the book since he did not tell any more in-depth personal stories. For me personally, I did not really enjoy this book. I would not read it again.
In Tim O'Brien's story "The Things They Carried" we see how O'Brien uses symbolism in order to indirectly give us a message and help us to connect to what the soldiers are thinking and feeling. During a war soldiers tend to take with them items from home kind of as a security blanket. The items they normally take with them tend to reveal certain characteristics of their personality.
...bol of their innocence, and just as she became "dangerous and was ready for the kill"(O'Brien 111), the soldiers changed to become mysterious and cynical because of the war. A piece of the love story that vanished; the dreams and futures of the soldiers. They became tainted forever with terrifying images burning through their minds. “‘What happened to her, Rat said, was what happened to all of them. You come over clean and you get dirty and then afterward it’s never the same” (O'Brien 109). The things they saw; the things they lived, they couldn't retell, for no one would believe it. Mary Ann Bell and Mark Fossie represented the relationships lost due to the war, the loved ones that had forgotten or who would never understand the changes. They represented the dreams that had changed and been lost. They were the innocence and naivety turned to disparagement.
The setting remains the same throughout this chapter but the scenery changes quite dramatically. From varnished wood and stripes and painted circles the scenery transforms into army cots and army issue blankets. This seems to cry out a lot of powerful emotion to the reader as the army image continues to come up, keeping a clear focus on what main be one of the main issues of the story.