Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the reconstruction era
The political, social, and economic effects of reconstruction
Consequences of the reconstruction era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the reconstruction era
Lemann’s Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War gives the reader an account of events, many of which are violent, just after the end of the Civil War. On the surface, Lemann spends great time documenting the violence faced by southern blacks and the life of Adelbert Ames. However, the backdrop is more complex and deals with the changing environment in the United States. Most importantly, the need of the United States needed to integrate four million former slaves into society. Lemann states the purpose of this book is to answer the question “what kinds of lives black people might live in the South now depended on the freed slaves’ organizing abilities and on the reliability of their voting rights” (xi). The subtitle, The Last Battle of the Civil War, correctly states that although the Civil War had officially ended the battle stilled raged physically, politically, and through public sentiment. First, Lemann documents horrible accounts of violence against freed blacks. The casual observer views the underlying reasons for these attacks as simple racial hatred. However, Lemann connects the acts of violence to show an orchestrated movement intended to undermine both keys to the freed blacks’ quality of life, organizing abilities and voting rights. Violence against blacks existed for years, but in the form of a master supposedly disciplining his slave. The acts of violence outlined by Lemann show a shift from fear and ignorance to organized intimidation. After all, whites of the time viewed themselves “as protectors of [the] natural order” meaning racial superiority (65). What first started as a fear of being the minority turned quickly to a fear of losing political power and economic wealth. In the end, the use of violence all... ... middle of paper ... ...ward expansion and Northerner’s own view of racial superiority over blacks to care about what was occurring in the south (186). In conclusion, the Civil War ended in principle and name only with General Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. White Southerners would not accept the freed blacks as equals specifically with full civil and voting rights as granted by the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments (28). Lamar accomplishes his goal of defining the last battle of the Civil War. Southern whites’ use of physical violence, political maneuvering, and public persuasion resulted in Redemption not for freed Blacks, but for the southern whites. A victory so sound that it would sway historical accounts of what Reconstruction was actually about. Works Cited Lemann, Nicholas. Redemption: The Last Battle of The Civil War, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008. Print.
In the historical narrative Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War, Nicholas Leman gives readers an insight into the gruesome and savage acts that took place in the mid-1870s and eventually led to the end of the Reconstruction era in the southern states. Before the engaging narrative officially begins, Lemann gives a 29-page introduction to the setting and provides background information about the time period. With Republican Ulysses S. Grant as President of the United States of America and Republican Adelbert Ames, as the Governor of Mississippi, the narrative is set in a town owned by William Calhoun in the city of Colfax, Louisiana. As a formal military commander, Ames ensured a
David W. Blight's book Beyond the Battlefield: Race, Memory and the American Civil War, is an intriguing look back into the Civil War era which is very heavily studied but misunderstood according to Blight. Blight focuses on how memory shapes history Blight feels, while the Civil War accomplished it goal of abolishing slavery, it fell short of its ultimate potential to pave the way for equality. Blight attempts to prove that the Civil War does little to bring equality to blacks. This book is a composite of twelve essays which are spilt into three parts. The Preludes describe blacks during the era before the Civil War and their struggle to over come slavery and describes the causes, course and consequences of the war. Problems in Civil War memory describes black history and deals with how during and after the war Americans seemed to forget the true meaning of the war which was race. And the postludes describes some for the leaders of black society and how they are attempting to keep the memory and the real meaning of the Civil War alive and explains the purpose of studying historical memory.
Marable, Manning. Race, Reform, and Rebellion: The Second Reconstruction and Beyond in Black America, 1945-2006. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2007.
Marable, Manning. Race, reform, and rebellion: the second reconstruction and beyond in Black America, 1945-2006. 3rd ed. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2007. Print
The next few paragraphs will compare blacks in the north to blacks in the south in the 1800’s. In either location blacks were thought of as incompetent and inferior. The next few paragraphs will explain each group’s lifestyle and manner of living.
America has gone through many hardships and struggles since coming together as a nation involving war and changes in the political system. Many highly regarded leaders in America have come bestowing their own ideas and foundation to provide a better life for “Americans”, but no other war or political change is more infamous than the civil war and reconstruction. Reconstruction started in 1865 and ended in 1877 and still to date one of the most debated issues in American history on whether reconstruction was a failure or success as well as a contest over the memory, meaning, and ending of the war. According to, “Major Problems in American History” David W. Blight of Yale University and Steven Hahn of the University of Pennsylvania take different stances on the meaning of reconstruction, and what caused its demise. David W. Blight argues that reconstruction was a conflict between two solely significant, but incompatible objectives that “vied” for attention both reconciliation and emancipation. On the other hand Steven Hahn argues that former slaves and confederates were willing and prepared to fight for what they believed in “reflecting a long tradition of southern violence that had previously undergirded slavery” Hahn also believes that reconstruction ended when the North grew tired of the 16 year freedom conflict. Although many people are unsure, Hahn’s arguments presents a more favorable appeal from support from his argument oppose to Blight. The inevitable end of reconstruction was the North pulling federal troops from the south allowing white rule to reign again and proving time travel exist as freed Africans in the south again had their civil, political, and economical position oppressed.
Leon Litwak’s book, Trouble in Mind: Black Southerners in the Age of Jim Crow takes place during the early 19th century. During this time period, segregation was very popular and normal. Southern whites demonstrated vigorous acts to show their dominance over blacks. Litwack gives the readers a gruesome image of the lives of black southerners during the age of Jim Crow. The Age of Jim Crow was one of the most inhumane time periods of the United States history. Jim Crow laws were simply state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the southern regions of the United States. Which is why black southerners were powerless when it came to standing up
Yale Professor David Blight's book examines four writers he believes to be important in the study of the Civil War. These authors are: Robert Penn Warren, Bruce Catton, Edmund Wilson, and James Baldwin. He believes these four were significant in the literary works about the Civil War and left a profound impact on our Civil War understanding. These men represent the turn of the twentieth century views of the Civil War. The divergent backgrounds of the four writers provide different points of view with which David Blight tackles the literary view of racism, the war, and the Lost Cause. The intent of the book is to create an uncomfortable feeling in the reader's comprehension of all that is related to the Civil War as they are challenged on what
While reading through the Bible, a person does not expect to find so much forgiveness and unconditional love. As Christians, the Bible is our book whenever there are questions that need to be answered. Throughout his or her life, a Christian is taught of the life of Christ and His Resurrection, but there is a lot of information that seems to be overlooked. When asked to explain the big picture of the Bible, it is easiest to look through the main stories of the Bible and find common themes. While looking through the Bible, and finding so many themes present throughout, but there is one that important in the life of a Christian, the cycle of creation, fall, redemption, and restoration is one of the most important ones seen from Genesis to Revelation.
Redemption is a word that contains various meanings. It could be referring to forgiveness, or recovery. Perhaps an escape from something. It is something that everybody yearns for, but cannot quite grasp in their hands. It is not something that we can look for and find. In fact, redemption often comes our way on its own when we expect it the least. Three characters from three stories go through different conflicts and redeem themselves in ways they never would have guessed. Some even found redemption with the help of others. Guy Montag from the novel Fahrenheit 451 finds redemption through freedom and liberation. The lawyer in the short story The Bet redeems himself by way of recovery. Edmond Dantes achieved his redemption through deception. These three characters redeem themselves in different ways, but something they all share is that they all go through the process of redemption and become reformed in some way.
The North’s negligence also contributed to the end of Reconstruction. The North had failed to notice the many racially motivated atrocities that occurred in the South durin...
The American Revolution was a “light at the end of the tunnel” for slaves, or at least some. African Americans played a huge part in the war for both sides. Lord Dunmore, a governor of Virginia, promised freedom to any slave that enlisted into the British army. Colonists’ previously denied enlistment to African American’s because of the response of the South, but hesitantly changed their minds in fear of slaves rebelling against them. The north had become to despise slavery and wanted it gone. On the contrary, the booming cash crops of the south were making huge profits for landowners, making slavery widely popular. After the war, slaves began to petition the government for their freedom using the ideas of the Declaration of Independence,” including the idea of natural rights and the notion that government rested on the consent of the governed.” (Keene 122). The north began to fr...
...icit in the cause of white supremacists, and is in fact as personally involved with the subject of his scholarly article as Wright is with his own less academic essay. Phillips’s evidentiary support is subject to a striking caveat, one which puts almost any source to work for his purposes, “When…slavery was attacked it was defended not only as a vested interest, but…as a guarantee of white supremacy and civilization. Its defenders did not always take pains to say that this was what they chiefly meant, but it may nearly always be read between their lines.” This has the effect of providing an assumed motive for all of his sources; Phillips’s reader also begins to ‘read between the lines.’ The most troubling aspect of his article is that, in the guise of a serious historian, he twists historical fact to suit his thesis, rather than suiting his thesis to the facts.
Dawson provides a telling narrative of the problems southerners perceive in regards to Black suffrage and change. Dawson rants on how the entire concept of allowing black men to enjoy his “status” is a disgrace to the country, and laments how future generations will look back in awe and wonder as to how a political system could be sacrificed to accommodate the black man (Dailey, 9). Interestingly, Dawson does not seem to have as much anger towards political equality, as he does in the thought of social equality. There is a differentiation here, in which he appears to describe the ‘slippery slope’ of suffrage. While political equality is certainly an irritating point for Dawson, his anger towards the prospect of social equality is seen explicitly seen when he describes the Spanish States of America. Dawson uses the terms “disgusting” and “deteriorating” due to the mixed races present in the Spanish States (9). He then goes on to say that black suffrage will force down the Anglo-Saxon race and deteriorate the race altogether (10). His anger seems to stem from the fact that suffrage will allow the possibility for black citizens to leave their oppressed status and essentially deny the social hierarchy that many southern white men had enjoyed for decades. This is referenced once more in Edwards’ work, in which she writes that the southern elite were scared of social equality because it threatened the very foundations of the hierarchy (Edwards, 110). This is also seen in the fear exhibited to black men due to their newfound ability to defy orders and ignore the whims of their employers (116). Instances such as these indicates the changes that occurred during the reconstruction era that would show a notable shift in the positions of black men and women in
Throughout The Bible redemption is a reoccurring theme that is often seen with characters. This passage of The Bible concentrates on two main female characters, Naomi and Ruth. Naomi moved to the country of Moab with her husband Elimelech, and two sons, Mahlon and Kilion. Elimelech died, and Naomi was left with her two sons, who took Moabite wives, one named Orpah and the other Ruth. After about 10 years, Mahlon and Kilion also died resulting in Naomi losing both her husband and her sons. After hearing that her home town had passed the famine she had no reason not to return. She told her daughters-in-law, “Go back, each of you, to your mother’s home. May the Lord show kindness to you, as you have shown to your dead and to me. May the Lord grant that each of you will find rest in the home of another husband” (verse 8-9). Orpah was convinced by Naomi’s plea, and tearfully kissed her mother-in-law goodbye. Whereas Ruth pleaded with Naomi, “Don’t urge me to leave you, or turn back from you” (Ruth 1:16)