Reconstruction Film Analysis

1058 Words3 Pages

Reconstruction was successful in reuniting the country physically but not mentally. President Abe Lincoln wanted to restore peace and, "with malice toward none, with charity for all... bind up the nation's wounds". Lincoln issued in 1863 the Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction which allowed southern states who had at least 10% of its voters, pledge their allegiance to return to the Union. All eleven confederate states were readmitted to the Union so, the states were united as one land mass, but the people were not united in their beliefs of how the losing Southerners and freed slaves should be treated. President Lincoln pardoned some confederate officers and restored all Southerner’s citizenship rights, except owning slaves. Radical …show more content…

President Johnson angered Congressmen Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner by being too lenient on the South. Johnson pardoned many and returned property to southern land owners that had been taken under the 1862 Confiscation Act. Thaddeus Stevens fought for, "justice for all God's creatures without distinction of race and color...". Eric Foner in the movie captured this anger and those of many Northerners and freedmen who felt, "Johnson's aim was to bring the white south and the white north back together. African Americans just do not play a role in Johnson's vision of the post-war South other than to go back to work and be landless and rightness plantation laborers". The struggle between the two opposing sides continued further, hurting efforts to reunite the country. Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 that said freedmen should have citizenship rights and the 13th and 14th amendments were also passed. Johnson and Northern Democrats felt voting rights should be determined by the states. In the movie Walker expresses the views of many southerners when he calls the North, "a vicious aggressor committed to perversion, which was black …show more content…

The reconstruction did not unite the country. If the president and Congress could not agree on how to move forward, how could those in the South and North, who were both recovering from a devastating war? President Johnson claimed he was upholding Lincoln's reconstruction plan since he restored state's rights and reunited southern states in the Union. Congress argued that they were trying to uphold the objective of the Civil War by giving freedom and rights to African Americans. This division in the United States was furthered by white power groups. These groups believed the black man should not have political power. Unrest continued, the Civil Rights Bill of 1875 tried to address the social codes of the South, but little was done to enforce it and it later was declared unconstitutional. Black people were shot trying to vote, and president Grant did not react, out of fear of losing his position. Reconstruction may have joined the states as one land mass, but it was not successful in reuniting the people of the South and North, or people with different belief systems during this time

Open Document