Reconstruction Argumentative Essay

666 Words2 Pages

“I had crossed the line. I was free; but there was no one to welcome me to the land of freedom. I was a stranger in a strange land; and my home after all, was down in Maryland; because my father, my mother, my brothers, and sisters, and friends were there. But I was free, and they should be free." (Harriet Tubman, Scenes in the Life of Harriet Tubman By Sarah Hopkins Bradford) This line of freedom was greatly searched for by the African Americans of this time. Freedom is every human's right. To this day around the world we still for freedom and ways to make ends meet without being judged by the color of our skin or the religion we choose to practice. Great accomplishments were seen during the time periods 1865 to the 1920s. America went through …show more content…

Between the years from 1865 to 1877, the nation’s laws and Constitution were rewritten to guarantee the basic rights of the former slaves (Why Reconstruction Matters). These basic rights included freedom, recognition as citizens which included the right to vote, and equality. African-Americans were now free from slavery, were able to establish their own church and united with their families that they were separated from during slavery. The Reconstruction gave them the ability for an equal chance of gaining an education as well. The South established the first state-supported public schools where severed both black and white children (Foner pg. 464). Another law made was that it was illegal for railroads, hotels, and other institutions to discriminate on the basis of race (Foner pg. …show more content…

One of its foremost was to provide legal guidance for freed persons. This duty included the adjudication of disputes between blacks and whites, observation of trials, and the arrangement of contractual labor relationships between former slaves and owners. As part of this process, through a newly created category of freedmen's courts that could override local authority, the Bureau managed to overturn some of the harsher aspects of the black codes. Although freedom was given, the failure to respond to the former slaves’ desire for land left most with no choice but to work for their former owners (Why Reconstruction Matters). It seems as though they were able to take two steps forward and one step back. The Black Codes legalized marriage, ownership of property, and limited access to the courts. But still denied them the rights to testify against whites, to serve on juries or in state militias, or to vote (Foner pg. 453). Also, the Black Codes declared that those who failed to sign early labor contracts could be arrested and hired out to white landowners (Foner pg. 453). The purpose of the Reconstruction was to give African-Americans equal rights, but somehow they still found a way to keep racism alive and not grant them their

Open Document