Ratatouille

1602 Words4 Pages

All individuals have a passion for something, be it an item or activity. In modern culture, people are allowed to pursue whatever life they want with little to no opposition from society. The film, Ratatouille, follows characters have perspectives from both classic and modern culture who clash over their views, which in turn teaches a lesson to the audience. A lot of what modern culture comprises of is self expression and the ability to think outside the box. A great deal of self expression …show more content…

Only one critic remains, the sarcastic and authoritarian Anton Ego. As the main antagonist of the movie, he is against everything to come out of Gusteau’s mind, most vehemently towards the “Anyone can cook” slogan, and posthumously, Gusteau’s kitchen, making judgments before anything has even occurred. As a writer for “The Grim Eater”, a food critic literature, he is very hard to impress; his typewriter is even an obvious pictorial of a skull. Ego holds the art of cooking to a very high stature, believing that only a gifted few barely possess the ability. He is the classic culture of Ratatouille, stuck in old views, fueling the opposition of independence and innovation in the kitchen. Ego makes a surprise appearance to a press conference at Gusteau’s saying to Linguini, “You are new to this game and you’ve been playing without an opponent, which is as you may have guessed is against the rules [emphasis]” (Ratatouille). Seeing that Gusteau’s is bouncing back, Ego makes it a point to go and spoil it. He talks down to linguini, telling him that it’s against the rules for him to be practicing cooking without his approval, Ego being the opponent playing under the rules of cooking he has setup for …show more content…

They reveal this to Ego and he is in disbelief, and soon leaves after some explaining, thanking them for the meal while walking out. The fate of Gusteau’s hangs by thread that is in danger of being cut by Ego, which is explained very well by Elisabeth H. Buck. “Ego serves as the gatekeeper to the latter form of access, thereby rendering him Ratatouille’s most dangerous antagonist: the success of Gusteau’s, Linguini, Remy, and that of their mutual culinary creations hinges on his appraisal” (4). Ego decides who will stay and who will go when deciding who gets to pursue their passion and in the case of this situation, cooking. He is the most dangerous antagonist because the whole resolve of the film and therefore the end message lies in his

Open Document