Raoul Peck's I Am Not Your Negro '

1109 Words3 Pages

In I Am Not Your Negro, Raoul Peck directs the movie to follow the texts written by James Baldwin. Originally, James Baldwin had the idea of using his writing to create his final book, Remember This House, about the life and death of three famous activists, Malcolm X, Medgar Evers, and Martin Luther King, Jr. The film focuses on the issues of the mistreatment of African Americans in film and in society. The use of montage allows Raoul Peck to compare past injustices towards African Americans with present inequalities. Raoul Peck creation of this film wasn’t meant to be a Civil War documentary, but instead, he wanted people of all races to understand the truth about the nation's racism. I believe that I Am Not Your Negro, shows that there …show more content…

While he was alive James Baldwin became a novelist, essayist, playwright, poet and social critic. Baldwin has a personal connection to I Am Not Your Negro because the racism and homophobia in the United States pushed him to the point of moving to France. At the age of fifteen, Raoul Peck began reading the work of James Baldwin. James Baldwin allowed Raoul Peck to see that even though they had lived parallel lives they had shared similar racist experiences. When Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Medgar Evers were assassinated, it affected both James Baldwin and Raoul Peck. For James Baldwin, the assassination of his friend encouraged him to write a book about their personal lives. For Raoul Peck, on the other hand, the assassination made him reflect on his own life. Reflecting on his life, Raoul Peck soon decided to turn the writing of James Baldwin into a movie. On January 4th, 2017, Raoul Peck published I Am Not Your Negro. That was three years after the Black Lives Matter campaign began and three months after President Trump was elected. The film being published three months after the election of Donald Trump is significant because the President has made multiple racist comments, making it clearer to see that we are a divided nation. The film makes viewers see that racism has always existed even before the …show more content…

During the meeting, Lorraine Hansberry had asked that President Kennedy escort a small black child to school. She had felt that the gesture would make it clear that, “…Whoever spits on that child would be spitting on the nation” (Peck 43). President Kennedy did not agree with the gesture and felt it was meaningless. 1963, meeting between Bobby Kennedy and Lorraine Hansberry gives an example of the government ignoring the fact that there is a racial. Fast forward to 2017, when white nationalist marched on the University of Virginia opposing a plan to remove a statue of Robert E. Lee, the Confederate general, from a city park. During the protest, James Alex Fields plowed his car into a group of counter-protestors, killing one person, 32-year-old Heather Heyer. While this was occurring African American hoped President, Donald Trump would speak out against white nationalist. Instead, he did the opposite, according to PBS.org, Donald Trump stated, “Both sides deserved blame for violence in Charlottesville and that counter-protesters had acted very, very violently. I love all the people and Confederate statues are “our heritage.” Instead of speaking against racism and violence the President makes it clear that he does not support African Americans. As a viewer since both President Bobby Kennedy and Donald Trump didn't come

Open Document