Rain Man Analysis

518 Words2 Pages

The movie begins with self-centered, materialistic Charlie Babbitt (Tom Cruise), learning the death of his father. To settle his dad’s estate, he and his business partner/girlfriend, Susanna (Valeria Golino) travel to his home town Cincinnati. While he was hoping to inherit all of his dad’s estate, all he got was a car and a collection of rosebushes that he simply has no use for. The remaining $3 million fortune was put into a trust for an unnamed beneficiary. Charlie demands to know the identity of the beneficiary and finds out that it is a mental hospital where his long-lost autistic brother, Raymond (Dustin Hoffman) resides with a caretaker, Dr. Bruner (Gerald R. Molen). Motivated by the money, Charlie decides to use Raymond—the “Rain Man”—to his advantage and take half of his inheritance from the trustee, Dr. Bruner. Charlie kidnaps Raymond to California where Charlie lives until the inheritance matter is resolved. When Dr. Bruner refuses, Charlie then decides to …show more content…

First, I never realized that Charlie would be able to gain access to such private information like that. What he did to get the information—social engineering—sounds awfully illegal, but the movie decides to pass that on. Perhaps, maybe in Ohio, the confidentiality rules are more lenient than in other states. According to the article, the legality of Charlie’s action to find out about the unknown beneficiary depends on the state you are in, the parties involved in the trust, the lawyer, and the judge hearing the case (Fisher 2013). In some states, the beneficiary’s right to know certain aspect of the trust is absolute while in some states, it is limited even from the people who benefit from the trust. Trust itself being a very private entity, there are many rules as there are loopholes (some ridiculous and tedious and some coherent) to protect the privacy and interest of the parties involved in the

Open Document