Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racism in ernest j. gaines writing
Racism in ernest j. gaines writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racism in ernest j. gaines writing
The theme of racism plays a significant role throughout Gaines’ story, as we see Jefferson falsely accused of murder and consequently sentenced to death, and Mr. Wiggins repeatedly belittled and abused all as a result of racism. At the beginning of the novel, it is the racism of an all white, all male jury that results in Jefferson being sentenced to death. I think it would be impossible for an all white jury to be unbiased when judging the actions of Jefferson because these white men have never lived as a black man and therefore, would not be able to relate to how Jefferson viewed the situation he found himself in when Mr. Gropé was shot. Jefferson’s trial was unfair and by today’s standards unconstitutional because the jury was not impartial and ought to have included a mix of races and genders. This theme of racism continues through the novel as Grant is disrespected and humiliated by several of the …show more content…
In the court room, the lawyer tries to use Jefferson’s lack of education as part of his defense as he asks the jury “Gentlemen…look at him…Do you see a man sitting here...Do you see a modicum of intelligence? Do you see anyone…who could plan a murder, a robbery…anything? (7). Jefferson’s Godmother calls upon Mr. Wiggins to help teach Jefferson as she sees education as the way to raise Jefferson up from being considered nothing more than an animal. Mr. Wiggins also sees education as a way to rise above the inferior position blacks in his community are forced into, as evidenced when he tells his young students how he is to teach Jefferson and “…make him a man. Exactly what I’m trying to do here with you now: to make you responsible young men and young ladies” (39). Grant even feels educated white people are better than the uneducated as can be seen when Grant speaks of the deputy named Paul “he was the most likely to be honest with me…he seemed better educated than the chief deputy or the
Jefferson is trapped in a racist and ignorant place, this is shown countless times throughout the book, for example when Jefferson's defendant said ”A cornered animal to strike quickly in fear a trait inherited by his ancestors in the deepest jungles of blackest Africa...What you see here is a thing that acts on command. A thing to hold the handle of a plow, a thing to load your bales of cotton”(Gaines 7) .
For Jefferson, racial injustice is present in court. Because of the color of his skin, Jefferson was automatically found guilty by those 12 men. “12 white men say a black man must die, and another white man sets the date and time without consulting one black person, Justice?” (157) The jury that decided his sentence was made up of 12 white men. Jefferson’s trial was unfair because the verdict was made by all white men. Jefferson was really just at the wrong place at the wrong time, but the biased jury saw him as guilty before finding any real evidence. This scene from court is an example of how Jefferson is treated unfairly because of the way he is viewed by others.
In a scene in the book, Grant displays how race determines everything about a person in a relationship as he added “Sir” when he replied with “I have no idea.” just as Henri Pichot asked if he could really help Jefferson, because Henri is a white man and is superior. Henri is treated as a superiority and this allowed him to talk down to Grant, as well as to Tante Lou and Miss Emma. Race limits people, as well. As Miss Emma is limited by the racist system to even think of a way of rescuing Jefferson from the death sentence, so all she has left is to hope that somehow he’ll be
I thought this quote was very interesting because of the strategy the attorney tried to use. It would be very un-expected to learn that this guy is actually trying to defend Jefferson. For this case, Jefferson’s attorney tried to convince the jury that because of his African features that he has no intelligence therefore he couldn’t be held accountable for the crime he committed. I think that this is pretty wrong, from a readers point of view, knowing that Jefferson is actually
Racism is not only a crime against humanity, but a daily burden that weighs down many shoulders. Racism has haunted America ever since the founding of the United States, and has eerily followed us to this very day. As an intimidating looking black man living in a country composed of mostly white people, Brent Staples is a classic victim of prejudice. The typical effect of racism on an African American man such as Staples, is a growing feeling of alienation and inferiority; the typical effect of racism on a white person is fear and a feeling of superiority. While Brent Staples could be seen as a victim of prejudice because of the discrimination he suffers, he claims that the victim and the perpetrator are both harmed in the vicious cycle that is racism. Staples employs his reader to recognize the value of his thesis through his stylistic use of anecdotes, repetition and the contrast of his characterization.
In the early 1920's, many generational Americans had moderately racist views on the "new immigrants," those being predominantly from Southern and Eastern Europe. Americans showed hatred for different races, incompatibility with religion, fear of race mixing, and fear of a revolution from other races. At the time, people believed the Nordic race was supreme.
In this story, a white lawyer in 1930s Alabama must defend an African-American man accused of raping a white woman. At first, the black man’s case doesn’t seem to stand a chance against the word of a white woman. However, as the trial goes on, it appears that Tom Robinson, the defendant, has solid evidence that he is innocent. But at the end of the trial, Tom Robinson is found guilty of a crime he did not commit, simply because of the fact that he is black. The blatant racial discrimination expressed by the jury is shocking, but unfortunately not at all unexpected. Every single trial that involved a white person against a black person in that time period was ruled in favor of the white person. It is obvious that even though the events of the novel are fictional, they are extremely realistic, and the quote by Barbara Jordan ties directly into the novel To Kill a
As a black man himself, Grant endures the cruel yet ignored societal standard on the daily. Grant and the community have been brainwashed to believe in racist acts as an acceptable behavior. He learns from racist behaviors early in the beginning of the novel when the injustices are displayed at Jefferson's trial. The prosecutor in the trial spoke with a ruthless, inhumane tone with intentions to humiliate and dehumanize Jefferson. In attempt to make a case, the prosecutor asks the jury if they truly see a man that is capable of planning when looking at Jefferson and carries on with, “No, gentlemen, this skull here holds no plans. What you see here is a thing that acts on command. A thing to hold the handle of a plow, a thing to load your bales of cotton, a thing to dig your ditches, to chop your wood, to pull your corn. That is what you see here, but you do not see anything capable of planning a robbery or a murder. He does not even know the size of his clothes or his shoes” (Gaines 8). As the prosecutor refers to Jefferson as a “thing”, it is clear that respecting the colored people is of his least concern. As a colored man alike Jefferson, this makes Grant feel as worthless and inconsequential as the prosecutor is describes Jefferson to be. The merciless terms used by white people speaking of the colored are loosely thrown around so the black people learn to accept the labels
Therefore the colour of Tom Robinson’s skin was the defining factor in the jury’s decision. Since the jury declared Tom Robinson guilty, that reveals his fate of going to jail and eventually being killed which is obviously an injustice based on the discrimination against him.
The story opens with Grant recalling the trial and events leading up to it. Jefferson was on his way to a bar when he was offered a ride by two young black men. The trio went to hold up a liquor store to get drinks, but didn't have enough to pay. The two men demand to get drinks on credit and a shootout ensued, leaving Jefferson panicked in the aftermath. He grabs the money behind the counter, takes a drink and begins to run when two white men walk into the store. Of course, a young black man going to trial after the Civil War until the end of Jim Crow is bound to be unfairly and unjustly sentenced. Black men, even today are sometimes treated as guilty until proven otherwise. The prosecution spins the story, saying the three men went to the store with the intent to rob and murder Alcee Grope, the store owner. Jefferson was also accused of taking money and celebra...
“To show too much intelligence would have been an insult to them. To show a lack of intelligence would have been a greater insult to me.” This is a quotation of Grant’s thoughts. He was talking to the sheriff, and did not know how to act. He is more educated than the sheriff, but since he is black, he cannot show it.
Lest We Forget! This is an ode attributed to two different poems, but appropriate for this essay as well. Accordingly, many modifications are taking place in the South illustrating racial progress, nevertheless, the relations between Blacks and Whites stays subjected to the throes of deep-rooted prejudice, and biases, especially from Whites to the Blacks. As a consequence, in South Louisiana, racism toward Blacks remains extremely more widespread by the Cajun’s. Specifically, the Encyclopedia of World Cultures report “within the regional class structure, Cajuns are considered better than Blacks, but the lowest group of Whites. In general, they were seen as poor, uneducated, fun-loving backwoods folk. Cajuns generally viewed themselves as superior to the poor rural Whites referred to as Rednecks (1996).”
Tom Robinson’s trial, and in fact his entire life, was badly affected by racism. It is truly a testament to the corruption of society when a person who has earned a bad reputation is held in higher esteem than a person who was born with it, as is the case with Bob Ewell and Tom Robinson. Even though Tom was obviously honest in his testament, the jury sided with Bob Ewell because he was white. They made this decision despite the fact that the Ewell family was widely known to be a worthless part of society. Jem, not being racially prejudiced, could not understand this mentality. As Atticus pointed out, “If you (Jem) had been on the jury, son, and eleven other boys like you, Tom would be a free man.”
In the court, the director leaves out the systemic racism that Harper Lee claims is the reason Tom Robinson is convicted of rape (Dave). The racist community, and a mob of white men, make up the deciding factor of the court. However, for someone watching the movie it would not be understood that the hatred expressed towards Atticus is for supporting a black man ("Overview: To Kill a Mockingbird"). The only reason Tom loses the case is because he is black and the movie underplays this as the reason.
In the story, Crooks' home is, "a little shed that leaned off the wall of the barn." This suggests that he is isolated from the other men and treated like the animals he cares for and as such is made to live with them. Crooks' "bunk" was actually a long box filled with straw, which could further reinforce the fact that he is treated like an animal or it could show that he is poor and has low, if any social status. To say that Steinbeck seems to make his characters seem low and poor, Crooks seems to have a number of pleasant possessions, however, some are damaged but this could represent their amount of use.